Impact of Vascularity on Spinal Disorders Outcomes, Underestimated yet Probably Crucial: The Example of a Comparative Cohort of Epidural Abscesses.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Baptiste Boukebous, Liam Petrie, Joseph F Baker
{"title":"Impact of Vascularity on Spinal Disorders Outcomes, Underestimated yet Probably Crucial: The Example of a Comparative Cohort of Epidural Abscesses.","authors":"Baptiste Boukebous, Liam Petrie, Joseph F Baker","doi":"10.1177/21925682241300979","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective comparative cohort.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>(1) Describe the prevalence of the basivertebral vessel (BVV) in a cohort of spinal epidural abscesses (SEA) at lumbar or thoracic (2) correlate the presence of BVV to the risk of conservative treatment failure (CTF).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-six patients successfully managed without surgery were compared to 26 who required surgical management due to failed conservative management (lumbar and thoracic). Two observers sought the BVV on the sagittal T1 with contrast sequences of the initial MRI in a blinded fashion for Kappa score calculation. BVV-/BVV+: absence/presence. Demographic, radiological, and laboratory parameters, as well as functional scores, were recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For both observers, 29/52 patients had a BVV+ (55.7%); the agreement was 84% (Kappa: 0.80 CI 95% [0.70-0.90]). 5/23 (21.7%) BVV- patients had a successful medical treatment, while the proportion was 21/29 (72%) for BVV+ (<i>P</i> = .0003). The positive predictive value for BVV+, predicting successful conservative treatment, was 81%. The negative predictive value for BVV- predicting CTF was 69%. BVV- was predictive of CTF in multivariable logistic regression: OR = 40, CI 95% [5-880], <i>P</i> = .02, for agreed observations between observers. For both observers, the proportion of dorsal abscess was the highest for BVV+ (<i>P</i> = .01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The BVV is part of the epidural network. The absence of BVV was strongly correlated with an increased risk of CTF, leading to the need for subsequent surgical treatment. SEA's location pattern varied according to BVV detection. Although the spinal vascular anatomy has been well-known for over 100 years, there are still very few studies on its pathophysiological implications.</p>","PeriodicalId":12680,"journal":{"name":"Global Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":"21925682241300979"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11571172/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/21925682241300979","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study design: Retrospective comparative cohort.

Objective: (1) Describe the prevalence of the basivertebral vessel (BVV) in a cohort of spinal epidural abscesses (SEA) at lumbar or thoracic (2) correlate the presence of BVV to the risk of conservative treatment failure (CTF).

Methods: Twenty-six patients successfully managed without surgery were compared to 26 who required surgical management due to failed conservative management (lumbar and thoracic). Two observers sought the BVV on the sagittal T1 with contrast sequences of the initial MRI in a blinded fashion for Kappa score calculation. BVV-/BVV+: absence/presence. Demographic, radiological, and laboratory parameters, as well as functional scores, were recorded.

Results: For both observers, 29/52 patients had a BVV+ (55.7%); the agreement was 84% (Kappa: 0.80 CI 95% [0.70-0.90]). 5/23 (21.7%) BVV- patients had a successful medical treatment, while the proportion was 21/29 (72%) for BVV+ (P = .0003). The positive predictive value for BVV+, predicting successful conservative treatment, was 81%. The negative predictive value for BVV- predicting CTF was 69%. BVV- was predictive of CTF in multivariable logistic regression: OR = 40, CI 95% [5-880], P = .02, for agreed observations between observers. For both observers, the proportion of dorsal abscess was the highest for BVV+ (P = .01).

Conclusion: The BVV is part of the epidural network. The absence of BVV was strongly correlated with an increased risk of CTF, leading to the need for subsequent surgical treatment. SEA's location pattern varied according to BVV detection. Although the spinal vascular anatomy has been well-known for over 100 years, there are still very few studies on its pathophysiological implications.

血管对脊柱疾病预后的影响,虽被低估却可能至关重要:以硬膜外脓肿比较队列为例。
研究设计:目的:(1)描述腰椎或胸椎脊髓硬膜外脓肿(SEA)队列中椎管基底血管(BVV)的患病率(2)将椎管基底血管的存在与保守治疗失败(CTF)的风险相关联:将 26 例未经手术成功治疗的患者与 26 例因保守治疗(腰椎和胸椎)失败而需要手术治疗的患者进行比较。两名观察者以盲法在初始 MRI 的矢状 T1 与对比序列上寻找 BVV,以计算 Kappa 评分。BVV-/BVV+:无/有。记录人口统计学、放射学和实验室参数以及功能评分:两名观察者中,29/52 名患者的 BVV+(55.7%);一致性为 84%(Kappa:0.80 CI 95% [0.70-0.90])。5/23(21.7%)例 BVV- 患者接受了成功的药物治疗,而 21/29 例 BVV+ 患者接受了成功的药物治疗(72%)(P = 0.0003)。BVV+ 预测保守治疗成功的阳性预测值为 81%。BVV- 预测 CTF 的阴性预测值为 69%。在多变量逻辑回归中,BVV- 可预测 CTF:OR = 40,CI 95% [5-880],P = .02,观察者之间的观察结果一致。对于两位观察者而言,BVV+ 的背侧脓肿比例最高(P = .01):结论:BVV 是硬膜外网络的一部分。结论:BVV 是硬膜外网络的一部分,BVV 的缺失与 CTF 风险的增加密切相关,导致需要进行后续手术治疗。SEA 的位置模式因 BVV 检测而异。尽管脊髓血管解剖学已被人们熟知 100 多年,但有关其病理生理学意义的研究仍然很少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Global Spine Journal
Global Spine Journal Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
278
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Global Spine Journal (GSJ) is the official scientific publication of AOSpine. A peer-reviewed, open access journal, devoted to the study and treatment of spinal disorders, including diagnosis, operative and non-operative treatment options, surgical techniques, and emerging research and clinical developments.GSJ is indexed in PubMedCentral, SCOPUS, and Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信