Strengths and limitations of molecular diagnostics for Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia.

IF 3.9 3区 医学 Q1 PATHOLOGY
Lottie Brown, Alexandre Alanio, Mario Cruciani, Rosemary Barnes, J Peter Donnelly, Juergen Loeffler, Riina Rautemaa-Richardson, P Lewis White
{"title":"Strengths and limitations of molecular diagnostics for <i>Pneumocystis jirovecii</i> pneumonia.","authors":"Lottie Brown, Alexandre Alanio, Mario Cruciani, Rosemary Barnes, J Peter Donnelly, Juergen Loeffler, Riina Rautemaa-Richardson, P Lewis White","doi":"10.1080/14737159.2024.2405920","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>While <i>Pneumocystis</i> pneumonia (PcP) remains a major AIDS-defining disease, the majority of cases of PcP now present in the HIV-negative cohort, causing significant mortality. PcP PCR diagnosis is not novel, and the optimal route of diagnosis remains unclear, with an imperfect reference method and complexity in result interpretation for alternative tests.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>This extensive review utilizing a literature search underpinning a recent systematic review/meta-analysis discusses the technical and clinical performance of PcP PCR, the added benefits of PCR testing, future aspects/considerations, and how PCR may be best used in clinical algorithms to provide a probability of PcP.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Given the current imperfect reference test for PcP, an alternative would be beneficial. Concerns over PcP PCR generating false positive results are valid but can be resolved by using positivity thresholds that drive specificity. Unfortunately, the extensive range of PCR assays complicates the provision of a PCR reference method. Combination testing incorporating PCR and B-D-Glucan, along with clinical and host risk factors, is key to understanding the individual probability of PcP. It is critical that access to PcP PCR testing is improved through technical and logistical development. Conversely, syndromic approaches including PcP need to be fully evaluated.</p>","PeriodicalId":12113,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics","volume":" ","pages":"1-13"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14737159.2024.2405920","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: While Pneumocystis pneumonia (PcP) remains a major AIDS-defining disease, the majority of cases of PcP now present in the HIV-negative cohort, causing significant mortality. PcP PCR diagnosis is not novel, and the optimal route of diagnosis remains unclear, with an imperfect reference method and complexity in result interpretation for alternative tests.

Areas covered: This extensive review utilizing a literature search underpinning a recent systematic review/meta-analysis discusses the technical and clinical performance of PcP PCR, the added benefits of PCR testing, future aspects/considerations, and how PCR may be best used in clinical algorithms to provide a probability of PcP.

Expert opinion: Given the current imperfect reference test for PcP, an alternative would be beneficial. Concerns over PcP PCR generating false positive results are valid but can be resolved by using positivity thresholds that drive specificity. Unfortunately, the extensive range of PCR assays complicates the provision of a PCR reference method. Combination testing incorporating PCR and B-D-Glucan, along with clinical and host risk factors, is key to understanding the individual probability of PcP. It is critical that access to PcP PCR testing is improved through technical and logistical development. Conversely, syndromic approaches including PcP need to be fully evaluated.

肺孢子虫肺炎分子诊断的优势和局限性。
导言:尽管肺孢子虫肺炎(PcP)仍是艾滋病的主要致病因素,但目前大多数 PcP 病例都出现在 HIV 阴性人群中,并导致大量死亡。PcP PCR 诊断并不新颖,最佳诊断途径仍不明确,参考方法不完善,替代检测的结果解释也很复杂:本综述以文献检索为基础,广泛讨论了PcP PCR的技术和临床表现、PCR检测的额外益处、未来的方面/考虑因素,以及如何在临床算法中更好地使用PCR来提供PcP的概率:专家意见:鉴于目前的 PcP 参考检测方法并不完善,因此最好能有一种替代方法。对 PcP PCR 产生假阳性结果的担忧是有道理的,但可以通过使用提高特异性的阳性阈值来解决。遗憾的是,PCR 检测方法种类繁多,使得提供 PCR 参考方法变得复杂。结合 PCR 和 B-D-Glucan 以及临床和宿主风险因素的综合检测,是了解个人罹患 PcP 概率的关键。至关重要的是,要通过技术和后勤发展来改善 PcP PCR 检测的可及性。反之,也需要对包括 PcP 在内的综合征方法进行全面评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
71
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics (ISSN 1473-7159) publishes expert reviews of the latest advancements in the field of molecular diagnostics including the detection and monitoring of the molecular causes of disease that are being translated into groundbreaking diagnostic and prognostic technologies to be used in the clinical diagnostic setting. Each issue of Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics contains leading reviews on current and emerging topics relating to molecular diagnostics, subject to a rigorous peer review process; editorials discussing contentious issues in the field; diagnostic profiles featuring independent, expert evaluations of diagnostic tests; meeting reports of recent molecular diagnostics conferences and key paper evaluations featuring assessments of significant, recently published articles from specialists in molecular diagnostic therapy. Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics provides the forum for reporting the critical advances being made in this ever-expanding field, as well as the major challenges ahead in their clinical implementation. The journal delivers this information in concise, at-a-glance article formats: invaluable to a time-constrained community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信