Immunogenicity of adalimumab reference product and adalimumab-adbm in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, Crohn's disease and chronic plaque psoriasis: a pooled analysis of the VOLTAIRE trials.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Vibeke Strand, Dorothy McCabe, Shaun Bender
{"title":"Immunogenicity of adalimumab reference product and adalimumab-adbm in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, Crohn's disease and chronic plaque psoriasis: a pooled analysis of the VOLTAIRE trials.","authors":"Vibeke Strand, Dorothy McCabe, Shaun Bender","doi":"10.1136/bmjopen-2023-081687","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This post hoc analysis compared the immunogenicity of the biosimilar adalimumab-adbm (Cyltezo) with the adalimumab reference product (RP; Humira) across indications, including rheumatoid arthritis (RA), Crohn's disease (CD) and plaque psoriasis (PsO), and by patient sex in the VOLTAIRE trials programme.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In each active-comparator randomised controlled trial (RCT), immunogenicity was assessed at various time points by the proportion of patients with antidrug antibodies (ADAs) and neutralising antibodies (nAbs), using acid dissociation followed by electrochemiluminescence assay. Assay sensitivity was 50 ng/mL, and drug tolerance was ≥30 µg/mL (free drug) at the low positive control level.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Minor differences in immunogenicity parameters (ADAs, ADA titres and nAbs) were evident between adalimumab-adbm and adalimumab RP across these three immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs). The proportion of ADA-positive and nAb-positive patients increased from baseline over time in all three RCTs, as expected, and was similar in the RA and CD RCTs but with higher numbers of ADA-positive and nAb-positive patients reported in the PsO trial. Subgroup analysis by patient sex showed the same trend.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Differences among the RCTs may partially be explained by concomitant background therapy (methotrexate) in the RA trial, stable doses of azathioprine, 6-mercaptopurine or methotrexate in 36% of patients with CD and absence of background therapy in the PsO RCT. The analyses further confirm the biosimilarity of adalimumab-adbm with the adalimumab RP across IMIDs and provide supporting evidence that adalimumab-adbm is an interchangeable biosimilar with consistent clinical results in patients originally treated with the RP.</p><p><strong>Trial registration numbers: </strong>VOLTAIRE-RA (NCT02137226; EudraCT 2012-002945-40); VOLTAIRE-CD (NCT02871635; EudraCT 2016-000612-14); VOLTAIRE-PsO (NCT02850965; EudraCT 2016-000613-79).</p>","PeriodicalId":9158,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-081687","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This post hoc analysis compared the immunogenicity of the biosimilar adalimumab-adbm (Cyltezo) with the adalimumab reference product (RP; Humira) across indications, including rheumatoid arthritis (RA), Crohn's disease (CD) and plaque psoriasis (PsO), and by patient sex in the VOLTAIRE trials programme.

Methods: In each active-comparator randomised controlled trial (RCT), immunogenicity was assessed at various time points by the proportion of patients with antidrug antibodies (ADAs) and neutralising antibodies (nAbs), using acid dissociation followed by electrochemiluminescence assay. Assay sensitivity was 50 ng/mL, and drug tolerance was ≥30 µg/mL (free drug) at the low positive control level.

Results: Minor differences in immunogenicity parameters (ADAs, ADA titres and nAbs) were evident between adalimumab-adbm and adalimumab RP across these three immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs). The proportion of ADA-positive and nAb-positive patients increased from baseline over time in all three RCTs, as expected, and was similar in the RA and CD RCTs but with higher numbers of ADA-positive and nAb-positive patients reported in the PsO trial. Subgroup analysis by patient sex showed the same trend.

Conclusions: Differences among the RCTs may partially be explained by concomitant background therapy (methotrexate) in the RA trial, stable doses of azathioprine, 6-mercaptopurine or methotrexate in 36% of patients with CD and absence of background therapy in the PsO RCT. The analyses further confirm the biosimilarity of adalimumab-adbm with the adalimumab RP across IMIDs and provide supporting evidence that adalimumab-adbm is an interchangeable biosimilar with consistent clinical results in patients originally treated with the RP.

Trial registration numbers: VOLTAIRE-RA (NCT02137226; EudraCT 2012-002945-40); VOLTAIRE-CD (NCT02871635; EudraCT 2016-000612-14); VOLTAIRE-PsO (NCT02850965; EudraCT 2016-000613-79).

阿达木单抗参比产品和阿达木单抗-adbm在类风湿性关节炎、克罗恩病和慢性斑块状银屑病患者中的免疫原性:VOLTAIRE试验的汇总分析。
目的:这项事后分析比较了生物类似药阿达木单抗-adbm(Cyltezo)与阿达木单抗参比产品(RP;Humira)在不同适应症下的免疫原性,包括类风湿性关节炎(RA)、克罗恩病(CD)和斑块状银屑病(PsO),以及VOLTAIRE试验项目中不同性别患者的免疫原性:在每项活性对比剂随机对照试验(RCT)中,在不同的时间点通过抗药抗体(ADAs)和中和抗体(nAbs)患者的比例评估免疫原性,使用的方法是酸解离法和电化学发光法。检测灵敏度为 50 纳克/毫升,药物耐受性为低阳性对照水平≥30 微克/毫升(游离药物):在这三种免疫介导的炎症性疾病(IMID)中,阿达木单抗-adbm和阿达木单抗RP在免疫原性参数(ADA、ADA滴度和nAbs)上存在明显的微小差异。在所有三项研究中,随着时间的推移,ADA阳性和nAb阳性患者的比例都会从基线上升,这在RA和CD研究中与预期相似,但在PsO试验中,ADA阳性和nAb阳性患者的比例更高。按患者性别进行的分组分析显示了相同的趋势:RCT之间的差异可部分归因于RA试验中同时进行的背景治疗(甲氨蝶呤),36%的CD患者使用稳定剂量的硫唑嘌呤、6-巯基嘌呤或甲氨蝶呤,以及PsO RCT中没有进行背景治疗。这些分析进一步证实了阿达木单抗-adbm与阿达木单抗RP在IMID中的生物相似性,并提供了支持性证据,证明阿达木单抗-adbm是一种可互换的生物类似药,在最初接受RP治疗的患者中具有一致的临床效果:试验注册号:VOLTAIRE-RA(NCT02137226;EudraCT 2012-002945-40);VOLTAIRE-CD(NCT02871635;EudraCT 2016-000612-14);VOLTAIRE-PsO(NCT02850965;EudraCT 2016-000613-79)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMJ Open
BMJ Open MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
3.40%
发文量
4510
审稿时长
2-3 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Open is an online, open access journal, dedicated to publishing medical research from all disciplines and therapeutic areas. The journal publishes all research study types, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialist studies. Publishing procedures are built around fully open peer review and continuous publication, publishing research online as soon as the article is ready.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信