Spectral resolution techniques for the simultaneous spectrophotometric determination of anti-Parkinson drugs in their combined pharmaceutical dosage form and biological sample based on multivariate calibration and absorbance subtraction methods.

Fereshteh Zarnooshe Farahani, Mahmoud Reza Sohrabi, Fariba Tadayon
{"title":"Spectral resolution techniques for the simultaneous spectrophotometric determination of anti-Parkinson drugs in their combined pharmaceutical dosage form and biological sample based on multivariate calibration and absorbance subtraction methods.","authors":"Fereshteh Zarnooshe Farahani, Mahmoud Reza Sohrabi, Fariba Tadayon","doi":"10.1016/j.saa.2024.125399","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In this study, simultaneous determination of levodopa (LEV) and carbidopa (CBD) in binary mixtures, pharmaceutical formulation, and biological sample was conducted using the application of simple, fast, sensitive, and accurate UV-spectrophotometry in combination with chemometrics methods. The first method is net analyte signal (NAS) based on the multivariate calibration methods. The limit of detection (LOD) and limit of quantification (LOQ) were 0.9758, 0.7633 µg/mL and 2.956, 2.313 µg/mL over the linear range of 5-40 and 0.5-20 µg/mL for LEV and CBD, respectively. In the NAS approach, the mean recovery values of mixtures were 100.12 % for LEV and 99.65 % for CBD, where root mean square error (RMSE) values were 0.0106 and 0.0141 for LEV and CBD, respectively. The second method is absorbance subtraction (AS) based on the absorption factor technique for analyzing the isosbestic point. This model was constructed at an isosbestic point of 261 nm in the range of 5-40 and 0.5-20 µg/mL with coefficient determination (R<sup>2</sup>) of 0.9985 and 0.9996 for LEV and CBD, respectively. AS method could estimate LEV and CBD with LOD values of 1.924 and 0.5657 μg/mL and LOQ values of 5.833 and 1.714 μg/mL, respectively. The recovery percentage was between 91.50 % to 104.60 % with RMSE of 0.1455 for LEV and 92.00 % to 106.66 % with RMSE of 0.2508 for CBD. The introduced approaches have the benefit of concurrent analysis of the mentioned components without any pretreatment. Statistical comparison of the results of real sample analysis with high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) did not show a significant difference. These methods can replace HPLC in quality control laboratories when fast, precise, and low-cost analysis is needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":94213,"journal":{"name":"Spectrochimica acta. Part A, Molecular and biomolecular spectroscopy","volume":"327 ","pages":"125399"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spectrochimica acta. Part A, Molecular and biomolecular spectroscopy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.saa.2024.125399","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this study, simultaneous determination of levodopa (LEV) and carbidopa (CBD) in binary mixtures, pharmaceutical formulation, and biological sample was conducted using the application of simple, fast, sensitive, and accurate UV-spectrophotometry in combination with chemometrics methods. The first method is net analyte signal (NAS) based on the multivariate calibration methods. The limit of detection (LOD) and limit of quantification (LOQ) were 0.9758, 0.7633 µg/mL and 2.956, 2.313 µg/mL over the linear range of 5-40 and 0.5-20 µg/mL for LEV and CBD, respectively. In the NAS approach, the mean recovery values of mixtures were 100.12 % for LEV and 99.65 % for CBD, where root mean square error (RMSE) values were 0.0106 and 0.0141 for LEV and CBD, respectively. The second method is absorbance subtraction (AS) based on the absorption factor technique for analyzing the isosbestic point. This model was constructed at an isosbestic point of 261 nm in the range of 5-40 and 0.5-20 µg/mL with coefficient determination (R2) of 0.9985 and 0.9996 for LEV and CBD, respectively. AS method could estimate LEV and CBD with LOD values of 1.924 and 0.5657 μg/mL and LOQ values of 5.833 and 1.714 μg/mL, respectively. The recovery percentage was between 91.50 % to 104.60 % with RMSE of 0.1455 for LEV and 92.00 % to 106.66 % with RMSE of 0.2508 for CBD. The introduced approaches have the benefit of concurrent analysis of the mentioned components without any pretreatment. Statistical comparison of the results of real sample analysis with high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) did not show a significant difference. These methods can replace HPLC in quality control laboratories when fast, precise, and low-cost analysis is needed.

基于多元校准和吸光度减法的光谱分辨率技术,用于同时分光光度法测定抗帕金森病药物的药物剂型和生物样品。
本研究采用简单、快速、灵敏、准确的紫外分光光度法结合化学计量学方法,对二元混合物、药物制剂和生物样品中的左旋多巴(LEV)和卡比多巴(CBD)进行了同时测定。第一种方法是基于多元定标方法的净分析物信号(NAS)。在 5-40 微克/毫升和 0.5-20 微克/毫升的线性范围内,LEV 和 CBD 的检出限(LOD)和定量限(LOQ)分别为 0.9758、0.7633 微克/毫升和 2.956、2.313 微克/毫升。在 NAS 方法中,LEV 和 CBD 混合物的平均回收率分别为 100.12 % 和 99.65 %,均方根误差(RMSE)分别为 0.0106 和 0.0141。第二种方法是基于吸收因子技术的吸光度减法(AS),用于分析等距点。在 5-40 µg/mL 和 0.5-20 µg/mL 范围内,在 261 nm 的等基点上构建了该模型,LEV 和 CBD 的判定系数(R2)分别为 0.9985 和 0.9996。AS法对LEV和CBD的检出限分别为1.924和0.5657 μg/mL,定量限分别为5.833和1.714 μg/mL。LEV 的回收率在 91.50 % 至 104.60 % 之间,均方根误差为 0.1455;CBD 的回收率在 92.00 % 至 106.66 % 之间,均方根误差为 0.2508。所引入的方法具有无需任何预处理即可同时分析上述成分的优点。实际样品分析结果与高效液相色谱法(HPLC)的统计比较未显示出显著差异。在需要进行快速、精确和低成本分析时,这些方法可以取代质量控制实验室中的高效液相色谱法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信