Determining the Relationship Between Sleep Problems, Shock Pain, and Shock Anxiety in Patients With ICD.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Pace-Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-16 DOI:10.1111/pace.15102
Esra Buyruk, Eylem Topbaş, Gökhan Keskin
{"title":"Determining the Relationship Between Sleep Problems, Shock Pain, and Shock Anxiety in Patients With ICD.","authors":"Esra Buyruk, Eylem Topbaş, Gökhan Keskin","doi":"10.1111/pace.15102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>This study aimed to determine the relationship between sleep problems, shock pain, and shock anxiety in patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) and the affecting factors.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>The population of this descriptive cross-sectional study consisted of all patients who underwent ICD implantation in university hospital (N = 200), and the sample consisted of patients who met the inclusion criteria of the study (n = 132). Data were obtained using a \"General Information Form\", the \"Florida Shock Anxiety Scale (FSAS)\", the \"Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS)\", the \"Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)\", and the \"Visual Pain Scale (VPS)\". The mean age of the patients was 66.13 years. The VPS was 6.40 ± 3.36; the mean FSAS score was 29.98 ± 8.46; the mean PSQI score was 8.02 ± 3.81; the mean ESS score was 7.59 ± 4.10. PSQI had a statistically significant correlation with the total FSAS score (p < 0.001) and a statistically insignificant correlation with ESS (p > 0.001). Age, sex, marital status, smoking status, cohabitants, previous ICD shocks, the status of lying on ICD, and fear of dislocation of ICD affected the total FSAS score; sex, employment status, history of heart attack, defined sleep disorder, awakening from sleep due to nightmares, and cessation of breathing during sleep affected the total PSQI score; history of previously defined sleep disorder, history of heart attack, use of medication for a sleep disorder, the pain felt when lying on ICD, and pain experienced during ICD shocks affected the total ESS score. The mean shock VPS scores differed between patients who received an ICD shock during sleep and those who were awakened by nightmares.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>It was found that the shock anxiety and shock pain scores of ICD patients were above average, that they had poor sleep quality, and that their sleepiness was at the level of \"normal but increased daytime sleepiness\".</p>","PeriodicalId":54653,"journal":{"name":"Pace-Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology","volume":" ","pages":"95-105"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pace-Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/pace.15102","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: This study aimed to determine the relationship between sleep problems, shock pain, and shock anxiety in patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) and the affecting factors.

Methods and results: The population of this descriptive cross-sectional study consisted of all patients who underwent ICD implantation in university hospital (N = 200), and the sample consisted of patients who met the inclusion criteria of the study (n = 132). Data were obtained using a "General Information Form", the "Florida Shock Anxiety Scale (FSAS)", the "Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS)", the "Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)", and the "Visual Pain Scale (VPS)". The mean age of the patients was 66.13 years. The VPS was 6.40 ± 3.36; the mean FSAS score was 29.98 ± 8.46; the mean PSQI score was 8.02 ± 3.81; the mean ESS score was 7.59 ± 4.10. PSQI had a statistically significant correlation with the total FSAS score (p < 0.001) and a statistically insignificant correlation with ESS (p > 0.001). Age, sex, marital status, smoking status, cohabitants, previous ICD shocks, the status of lying on ICD, and fear of dislocation of ICD affected the total FSAS score; sex, employment status, history of heart attack, defined sleep disorder, awakening from sleep due to nightmares, and cessation of breathing during sleep affected the total PSQI score; history of previously defined sleep disorder, history of heart attack, use of medication for a sleep disorder, the pain felt when lying on ICD, and pain experienced during ICD shocks affected the total ESS score. The mean shock VPS scores differed between patients who received an ICD shock during sleep and those who were awakened by nightmares.

Conclusions: It was found that the shock anxiety and shock pain scores of ICD patients were above average, that they had poor sleep quality, and that their sleepiness was at the level of "normal but increased daytime sleepiness".

确定 ICD 患者的睡眠问题、冲击疼痛和冲击焦虑之间的关系。
目的:本研究旨在确定植入式心脏除颤器(ICD)患者的睡眠问题、电击疼痛和电击焦虑之间的关系及其影响因素:这项描述性横断面研究的研究对象包括在大学医院接受 ICD 植入术的所有患者(200 人),样本包括符合研究纳入标准的患者(132 人)。研究人员使用 "一般信息表"、"佛罗里达冲击焦虑量表(FSAS)"、"埃普沃思嗜睡量表(ESS)"、"匹兹堡睡眠质量指数(PSQI)"和 "视觉疼痛量表(VPS)"获取数据。患者的平均年龄为 66.13 岁。VPS为(6.40 ± 3.36)分;FSAS平均分为(29.98 ± 8.46)分;PSQI平均分为(8.02 ± 3.81)分;ESS平均分为(7.59 ± 4.10)分。PSQI 与 FSAS 总分有显著的统计学相关性(P 0.001)。年龄、性别、婚姻状况、吸烟状况、同居者、既往 ICD 震动、ICD 上躺着的状况和对 ICD 脱位的恐惧影响了 FSAS 总分;性别、就业状况、心脏病发作史、已定义的睡眠障碍、因噩梦而从睡眠中惊醒和睡眠中停止呼吸影响了 PSQI 总分;先前定义的睡眠障碍史、心脏病发作史、服用治疗睡眠障碍的药物、躺在 ICD 上时的疼痛感以及 ICD 电击时的疼痛感会影响 ESS 总分。睡眠中接受 ICD 电击的患者和被噩梦惊醒的患者的电击 VPS 平均得分不同:结论:研究发现,ICD 患者的电击焦虑和电击疼痛评分高于平均水平,他们的睡眠质量较差,嗜睡程度处于 "正常但白天嗜睡增加 "的水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pace-Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology
Pace-Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology 医学-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
5.60%
发文量
209
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology (PACE) is the foremost peer-reviewed journal in the field of pacing and implantable cardioversion defibrillation, publishing over 50% of all English language articles in its field, featuring original, review, and didactic papers, and case reports related to daily practice. Articles also include editorials, book reviews, Musings on humane topics relevant to medical practice, electrophysiology (EP) rounds, device rounds, and information concerning the quality of devices used in the practice of the specialty.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信