Multi-type stroke lesion segmentation: comparison of single-stage and hierarchical approach.

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
Zeynel A Samak
{"title":"Multi-type stroke lesion segmentation: comparison of single-stage and hierarchical approach.","authors":"Zeynel A Samak","doi":"10.1007/s11517-024-03243-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Stroke, a major cause of death and disability worldwide, can be haemorrhagic or ischaemic depending on the type of bleeding in the brain. Rapid and accurate identification of stroke type and lesion segmentation is critical for timely and effective treatment. However, existing research primarily focuses on segmenting a single stroke type, potentially limiting their clinical applicability. This study addresses this gap by exploring multi-type stroke lesion segmentation using deep learning methods. Specifically, we investigate two distinct approaches: a single-stage approach that directly segments all tissue types in one model and a hierarchical approach that first classifies stroke types and then utilises specialised segmentation models for each subtype. Recognising the importance of accurate stroke classification for the hierarchical approach, we evaluate ResNet, ResNeXt and ViT networks, incorporating focal loss and oversampling techniques to mitigate the impact of class imbalance. We further explore the performance of U-Net, U-Net++ and DeepLabV3 models for segmentation within each approach. We use a comprehensive dataset of 6650 images provided by the Ministry of Health of the Republic of Türkiye. This dataset includes 1130 ischaemic strokes, 1093 haemorrhagic strokes and 4427 non-stroke cases. In our comparative experiments, we achieve an AUC score of 0.996 when classifying stroke and non-stroke slices. For lesion segmentation task, while the performance of different architectures is comparable, the hierarchical training approach outperforms the single-stage approach in terms of intersection over union (IoU). The performance of the U-Net model increased significantly from an IoU of 0.788 to 0.875 when the hierarchical approach is used. This comparative analysis aims to identify the most effective approach and deep learning model for multi-type stroke lesion segmentation in brain CT scans, potentially leading to improved clinical decision-making, treatment efficiency and outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":49840,"journal":{"name":"Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-024-03243-4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Stroke, a major cause of death and disability worldwide, can be haemorrhagic or ischaemic depending on the type of bleeding in the brain. Rapid and accurate identification of stroke type and lesion segmentation is critical for timely and effective treatment. However, existing research primarily focuses on segmenting a single stroke type, potentially limiting their clinical applicability. This study addresses this gap by exploring multi-type stroke lesion segmentation using deep learning methods. Specifically, we investigate two distinct approaches: a single-stage approach that directly segments all tissue types in one model and a hierarchical approach that first classifies stroke types and then utilises specialised segmentation models for each subtype. Recognising the importance of accurate stroke classification for the hierarchical approach, we evaluate ResNet, ResNeXt and ViT networks, incorporating focal loss and oversampling techniques to mitigate the impact of class imbalance. We further explore the performance of U-Net, U-Net++ and DeepLabV3 models for segmentation within each approach. We use a comprehensive dataset of 6650 images provided by the Ministry of Health of the Republic of Türkiye. This dataset includes 1130 ischaemic strokes, 1093 haemorrhagic strokes and 4427 non-stroke cases. In our comparative experiments, we achieve an AUC score of 0.996 when classifying stroke and non-stroke slices. For lesion segmentation task, while the performance of different architectures is comparable, the hierarchical training approach outperforms the single-stage approach in terms of intersection over union (IoU). The performance of the U-Net model increased significantly from an IoU of 0.788 to 0.875 when the hierarchical approach is used. This comparative analysis aims to identify the most effective approach and deep learning model for multi-type stroke lesion segmentation in brain CT scans, potentially leading to improved clinical decision-making, treatment efficiency and outcomes.

多类型脑卒中病灶分割:单阶段方法与分层方法的比较。
中风是全球死亡和残疾的主要原因,根据脑出血的类型,可分为出血性和缺血性中风。快速准确地识别中风类型和病灶分割对于及时有效的治疗至关重要。然而,现有的研究主要集中在对单一中风类型进行分割,可能会限制其临床适用性。本研究利用深度学习方法探索多类型中风病灶分割,弥补了这一空白。具体来说,我们研究了两种不同的方法:一种是在一个模型中直接分割所有组织类型的单阶段方法,另一种是首先对中风类型进行分类,然后针对每个子类型使用专门分割模型的分层方法。由于认识到准确的中风分类对分层方法的重要性,我们对 ResNet、ResNeXt 和 ViT 网络进行了评估,并采用了焦点丢失和超采样技术来减轻类别不平衡的影响。我们进一步探讨了 U-Net、U-Net++ 和 DeepLabV3 模型在每种方法中的分割性能。我们使用了土耳其共和国卫生部提供的一个包含 6650 幅图像的综合数据集。该数据集包括 1130 例缺血性脑卒中、1093 例出血性脑卒中和 4427 例非脑卒中病例。在对比实验中,我们对脑卒中和非脑卒中切片进行分类的 AUC 得分为 0.996。在病灶分割任务中,虽然不同架构的性能相当,但分层训练方法在交集大于联合(IoU)方面优于单级方法。使用分层方法后,U-Net 模型的性能从 IoU 0.788 显著提高到 0.875。这项比较分析旨在确定脑 CT 扫描中多类型卒中病灶分割的最有效方法和深度学习模型,从而改善临床决策、治疗效率和疗效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing
Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing 医学-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
3.10%
发文量
249
审稿时长
3.5 months
期刊介绍: Founded in 1963, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing (MBEC) continues to serve the biomedical engineering community, covering the entire spectrum of biomedical and clinical engineering. The journal presents exciting and vital experimental and theoretical developments in biomedical science and technology, and reports on advances in computer-based methodologies in these multidisciplinary subjects. The journal also incorporates new and evolving technologies including cellular engineering and molecular imaging. MBEC publishes original research articles as well as reviews and technical notes. Its Rapid Communications category focuses on material of immediate value to the readership, while the Controversies section provides a forum to exchange views on selected issues, stimulating a vigorous and informed debate in this exciting and high profile field. MBEC is an official journal of the International Federation of Medical and Biological Engineering (IFMBE).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信