Most Athletes who fail to Return to Sport After Latarjet Procedure Cite Psychological Factors: a Systematic Review.

IF 4.4 1区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
James Ryan, Cory K Mayfield, Christian A Cruz, Jacob L Kotlier, Maya Abu-Zahra, Cailan L Feingold, Ioanna K Bolia, Joseph N Liu, Frank A Petrigliano
{"title":"Most Athletes who fail to Return to Sport After Latarjet Procedure Cite Psychological Factors: a Systematic Review.","authors":"James Ryan, Cory K Mayfield, Christian A Cruz, Jacob L Kotlier, Maya Abu-Zahra, Cailan L Feingold, Ioanna K Bolia, Joseph N Liu, Frank A Petrigliano","doi":"10.1016/j.arthro.2024.11.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this study was to identify the return-to-sport (RTS) rate in athletes undergoing a Latarjet procedure, while outlining the specific reasons for failure to RTS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An electronic literature search was conducted (PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science). Studies in peer-reviewed journals with Latarjet procedures performed on athletes that reported rates and reasons for failure to RTS were included. Excluded studies were those that reported solely on non-athletes, non-Latarjet surgery, and missing rates of and reasons for failure to RTS. Study heterogeneity was assessed using the I<sup>2</sup> statistic and quality assessment was performed using the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS) criteria.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After review of 3617 articles, a total of 18 studies with 1,066 patients met the inclusion criteria. The level of evidence for included studies ranged from LOE II to LOE IV. Rates of not returning to sports (NRTS) ranged from 3.4-35.3%. More studies cited shoulder-unrelated reasons than shoulder-related reasons for why athletes failed to RTS. Ten (55.5%) studies, making up 656 (61.5%) patients reported that shoulder-unrelated reasons were accountable for more than 50% of NRTS. Only 3 (16.7%) studies reported 100% NRTS due to shoulder-related reasons, which include fear of reinjury and psychological factors. Study heterogeneity was found to be moderate (I<sup>2</sup> = 73.4%; 95% CI: 57.5-83.3; p < 0.001) and study quality was found to be satisfactory (Mean MINORS score 12.1 for non-comparative and 20.5 for comparative studies).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>According to this systematic review, the rate of NRTS after Latarjet ranged from 3.4-35.3% across 18 studies, with the majority of studies citing non-shoulder related reasons such as fear or reinjury or psychological factors as the major deterrent for returning to sports.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>IV Systematic Review of Case Series.</p>","PeriodicalId":55459,"journal":{"name":"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2024.11.003","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to identify the return-to-sport (RTS) rate in athletes undergoing a Latarjet procedure, while outlining the specific reasons for failure to RTS.

Methods: An electronic literature search was conducted (PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science). Studies in peer-reviewed journals with Latarjet procedures performed on athletes that reported rates and reasons for failure to RTS were included. Excluded studies were those that reported solely on non-athletes, non-Latarjet surgery, and missing rates of and reasons for failure to RTS. Study heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 statistic and quality assessment was performed using the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS) criteria.

Results: After review of 3617 articles, a total of 18 studies with 1,066 patients met the inclusion criteria. The level of evidence for included studies ranged from LOE II to LOE IV. Rates of not returning to sports (NRTS) ranged from 3.4-35.3%. More studies cited shoulder-unrelated reasons than shoulder-related reasons for why athletes failed to RTS. Ten (55.5%) studies, making up 656 (61.5%) patients reported that shoulder-unrelated reasons were accountable for more than 50% of NRTS. Only 3 (16.7%) studies reported 100% NRTS due to shoulder-related reasons, which include fear of reinjury and psychological factors. Study heterogeneity was found to be moderate (I2 = 73.4%; 95% CI: 57.5-83.3; p < 0.001) and study quality was found to be satisfactory (Mean MINORS score 12.1 for non-comparative and 20.5 for comparative studies).

Conclusion: According to this systematic review, the rate of NRTS after Latarjet ranged from 3.4-35.3% across 18 studies, with the majority of studies citing non-shoulder related reasons such as fear or reinjury or psychological factors as the major deterrent for returning to sports.

Level of evidence: IV Systematic Review of Case Series.

大多数在拉塔喷射术后未能重返运动场的运动员都有心理因素:系统回顾。
目的:本研究旨在确定接受拉塔杰特手术的运动员重返赛场(RTS)率,同时概述未能重返赛场的具体原因:方法:进行电子文献检索(PubMed/MEDLINE、Scopus、Web of Science)。纳入了同行评审期刊中对运动员进行 Latarjet 手术并报告了 RTS 失败率和原因的研究。仅报告非运动员、非Latarjet手术以及缺少RTS失败率和失败原因的研究除外。研究异质性采用 I2 统计量进行评估,质量评估采用非随机研究方法指数(MINORS)标准:在对 3617 篇文章进行审查后,共有 18 项研究、1066 名患者符合纳入标准。纳入研究的证据级别从 LOE II 到 LOE IV 不等。未重返运动场(NRTS)的比例从 3.4% 到 35.3% 不等。对于运动员未能重返运动场的原因,更多研究提到了与肩无关的原因,而非与肩相关的原因。10项(55.5%)研究报告称,在656名(61.5%)患者中,超过50%的NRTS是由于与肩无关的原因造成的。只有3项(16.7%)研究报告称,100%的NRTS是由于肩部相关原因造成的,其中包括害怕再次受伤和心理因素。研究异质性为中等(I2 = 73.4%; 95% CI: 57.5-83.3; p < 0.001),研究质量令人满意(非比较性研究的平均 MINORS 得分为 12.1,比较性研究的平均 MINORS 得分为 20.5):根据该系统综述,18 项研究显示,Latarjet 术后 NRTS 的发生率从 3.4% 到 35.3% 不等,大多数研究认为与肩部无关的原因(如害怕再次受伤或心理因素)是阻碍患者重返运动场的主要原因:证据级别:IV
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.30
自引率
17.00%
发文量
555
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: Nowhere is minimally invasive surgery explained better than in Arthroscopy, the leading peer-reviewed journal in the field. Every issue enables you to put into perspective the usefulness of the various emerging arthroscopic techniques. The advantages and disadvantages of these methods -- along with their applications in various situations -- are discussed in relation to their efficiency, efficacy and cost benefit. As a special incentive, paid subscribers also receive access to the journal expanded website.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信