A qualitative study on the experiences of autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplant for Multiple Sclerosis

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Laura Davenport , Mathew McCauley , Liam Smyth , Audrey Reynolds , Maria Gaughan , Niall Tubridy , Chris McGuigan , Fiadhnait O'Keeffe
{"title":"A qualitative study on the experiences of autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplant for Multiple Sclerosis","authors":"Laura Davenport ,&nbsp;Mathew McCauley ,&nbsp;Liam Smyth ,&nbsp;Audrey Reynolds ,&nbsp;Maria Gaughan ,&nbsp;Niall Tubridy ,&nbsp;Chris McGuigan ,&nbsp;Fiadhnait O'Keeffe","doi":"10.1016/j.msard.2024.106165","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aim</h3><div>Autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) is an effective treatment for people with highly-active relapsing multiple sclerosis (MS), who are not adequately responding to disease-modifying therapies. To date, research has predominantly focused on disease-specific outcome measures. There is a lack of research exploring patient experiences of this complex treatment. The study aims to explore the experience of considering and receiving HSCT treatment for MS.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Semi-structured interviews were conducted online with 12 adults with MS who had undergone HSCT treatment. Interview topics covered the experience of deciding on the treatment, the HSCT process itself, and the patient-reported outcomes following HSCT. Interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. A thematic analysis approach was employed.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Three main themes were identified: (1) <em>Balancing hope and fear</em> explores the decision-making experience when considering HSCT as a treatment; (2) <em>Distinct emotional experience,</em> highlights the unique challenges faced on all stages of the treatment journey; and (3) <em>Adjusting to outcomes,</em> explores how participants make sense of the aftermath of the treatment, including managing the ongoing uncertainty of MS and complications arising from HSCT.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>HSCT is a complex treatment, both physically and psychologically for pwMS. A comprehensive and holistic care pathway is required to support people with MS at all stages of the treatment process, to ensure patient-centred planning and care.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":18958,"journal":{"name":"Multiple sclerosis and related disorders","volume":"92 ","pages":"Article 106165"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Multiple sclerosis and related disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211034824007417","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim

Autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) is an effective treatment for people with highly-active relapsing multiple sclerosis (MS), who are not adequately responding to disease-modifying therapies. To date, research has predominantly focused on disease-specific outcome measures. There is a lack of research exploring patient experiences of this complex treatment. The study aims to explore the experience of considering and receiving HSCT treatment for MS.

Methods

Semi-structured interviews were conducted online with 12 adults with MS who had undergone HSCT treatment. Interview topics covered the experience of deciding on the treatment, the HSCT process itself, and the patient-reported outcomes following HSCT. Interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. A thematic analysis approach was employed.

Results

Three main themes were identified: (1) Balancing hope and fear explores the decision-making experience when considering HSCT as a treatment; (2) Distinct emotional experience, highlights the unique challenges faced on all stages of the treatment journey; and (3) Adjusting to outcomes, explores how participants make sense of the aftermath of the treatment, including managing the ongoing uncertainty of MS and complications arising from HSCT.

Discussion

HSCT is a complex treatment, both physically and psychologically for pwMS. A comprehensive and holistic care pathway is required to support people with MS at all stages of the treatment process, to ensure patient-centred planning and care.
关于自体造血干细胞移植治疗多发性硬化症经验的定性研究。
目的:自体造血干细胞移植(HSCT)是治疗高度活动性复发性多发性硬化症(MS)患者的一种有效方法。迄今为止,研究主要集中在疾病特异性结果测量方面。目前还缺乏探索患者对这种复杂治疗的体验的研究。本研究旨在探讨多发性硬化症患者考虑和接受造血干细胞移植治疗的经历:对 12 名接受过造血干细胞移植治疗的成年多发性硬化症患者进行了半结构化在线访谈。访谈主题包括决定治疗的经历、造血干细胞移植过程本身以及造血干细胞移植后患者报告的结果。对访谈进行了录音和逐字记录。采用了主题分析方法:确定了三大主题:(1)平衡希望与恐惧,探讨考虑将造血干细胞移植作为一种治疗方法时的决策经验;(2)独特的情感体验,强调在治疗过程的各个阶段所面临的独特挑战;(3)适应结果,探讨参与者如何理解治疗后的结果,包括处理多发性硬化症的持续不确定性和造血干细胞移植引起的并发症:造血干细胞移植是一种复杂的治疗方法,对患者的身体和心理都是如此。在治疗过程的各个阶段,都需要一个全面综合的护理路径来支持多发性硬化症患者,以确保以患者为中心的规划和护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
20.00%
发文量
814
审稿时长
66 days
期刊介绍: Multiple Sclerosis is an area of ever expanding research and escalating publications. Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders is a wide ranging international journal supported by key researchers from all neuroscience domains that focus on MS and associated disease of the central nervous system. The primary aim of this new journal is the rapid publication of high quality original research in the field. Important secondary aims will be timely updates and editorials on important scientific and clinical care advances, controversies in the field, and invited opinion articles from current thought leaders on topical issues. One section of the journal will focus on teaching, written to enhance the practice of community and academic neurologists involved in the care of MS patients. Summaries of key articles written for a lay audience will be provided as an on-line resource. A team of four chief editors is supported by leading section editors who will commission and appraise original and review articles concerning: clinical neurology, neuroimaging, neuropathology, neuroepidemiology, therapeutics, genetics / transcriptomics, experimental models, neuroimmunology, biomarkers, neuropsychology, neurorehabilitation, measurement scales, teaching, neuroethics and lay communication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信