Participation of Indigenous children and young people to improve health and wellbeing

IF 6.7 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Jordan Cory (Kamilaroi), Hope Kuchel (Barkindji), Bonnie Dukakis (Gunditjmara), Rhian Dicker (Palawa), Sandra Eades (Noongar)
{"title":"Participation of Indigenous children and young people to improve health and wellbeing","authors":"Jordan Cory (Kamilaroi),&nbsp;Hope Kuchel (Barkindji),&nbsp;Bonnie Dukakis (Gunditjmara),&nbsp;Rhian Dicker (Palawa),&nbsp;Sandra Eades (Noongar)","doi":"10.5694/mja2.52490","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Participation is widely recognised as a determinant of children and young people's health.<span><sup>1</sup></span> Both the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP) (Article 18) and the Convention on the Rights of the Child (Article 12) enshrine participation as an inalienable right.<span><sup>2, 3</sup></span> Despite this, the exclusion and non-participation of Indigenous children, adolescents and young people persists.<span><sup>4</sup></span></p><p>Indigenous children and young people experience worse health outcomes than their non-Indigenous peers and are starkly over-represented in the contact with youth justice and in out-of-home care.<span><sup>5-7</sup></span> We propose this is in part due to their exclusion and non-participation — both as children and as Indigenous people.<span><sup>4, 5, 7</sup></span> These children and young people's stories are often told for them, if at all.<span><sup>4</sup></span> “It didn't matter what I screamed at (Child Protection Services), they wanted to tell my story for me, decide for me, know what was best for me. That's easier than listening, isn't it?”, said one Indigenous young person in contact with the youth justice system.<span><sup>6</sup></span></p><p>Indigenous young people are less likely to access primary health services despite having more health needs than non-Indigenous counterparts.<span><sup>8</sup></span> Most children and young people in the youth justice system have severe neurodevelopmental disorders — nearly all previously undiagnosed and untreated.<span><sup>9</sup></span> Current mainstream health and youth services are failing to provide culturally safe rudimentary services and meet Indigenous children and young people's unique needs.<span><sup>5, 7, 8, 10</sup></span> They have not been designed with meaningful participation of Indigenous people, let alone children and young people.<span><sup>5, 8</sup></span> There is an urgency for meaningful participation of Indigenous children and young people in reform.<span><sup>4, 7, 8</sup></span> There is an urgency for decision makers to listen and act.<span><sup>4, 5, 7, 8</sup></span></p><p>Best-practice mechanisms like the case study provided in this article, the Victorian based youth-led, Indigenous-led Koorie Youth Council, which centres self-determination, can ensure that Indigenous children and young people are empowered.<span><sup>4</sup></span> This article is part of the 2024 <i>MJA</i> supplement for the Future Healthy Countdown 2030, which examines how participating affects the health and wellbeing of children, young people and future generations. Society must not only uphold Indigenous children and young people's rights, but also value their strengths and the expertise they hold about their own lives.<span><sup>4, 5, 7, 8, 11</sup></span></p><p>Participation is not a binary, it exists on a spectrum indicating the degree of agency afforded to individuals or groups to relationally determine outcomes.<span><sup>12, 13</sup></span> The degree of agency is the extent to which individuals can exercise freedom to determine their own outcomes, intersecting with the extent others exert power (and control) over them.<span><sup>14</sup></span> Arnstein's ladder describes participation as ranging from manipulation to degrees of tokenism, through to citizen control or, in the language of UNDRIP, self-determination (Box 1).<span><sup>2, 12</sup></span> In 1992, Hart adapted Arnstein's ladder of participation recognising adults as the relational power-holders over children and young people.<span><sup>15</sup></span> Developmentally, participation also allows children and young people the opportunity to practise agency, assess relational power dynamics, and invite others to participate in mutual causes.<span><sup>14, 15</sup></span></p><p>Indigenous concepts of health describe more than the physical status of an individual; they are collectivist and inclusive of “the social, emotional, and cultural wellbeing of the whole community”.<span><sup>16, 17</sup></span> Health exists not as a moment in time, but is a whole-of-life view.<span><sup>16</sup></span> Indigenous concepts of health are intrinsically relational and include not just anthropocentric relationships to family, kin and community, but to history, Country, lands, spirituality and culture.<span><sup>17-19</sup></span> Children and young people do not exist in isolation, but as Bronfenbrenner's ecological model describes, are influenced by the context around them (Box 2).<span><sup>20</sup></span> Participation, or children and young people's relational agency across the ecological system, is a key determinant of Indigenous health.<span><sup>7, 17</sup></span></p><p>Although Bronfenbrenner's ecological system model provides a valuable conceptual framework for considering relational agency, it should also be acknowledged that it was developed with ontological and epistemological foundations insufficient to capture Indigenous ways of knowing, being and doing. This is an unfortunate commonality among many mainstream youth social and health frameworks.<span><sup>16, 21, 22</sup></span> They are often not cross-culturally developed or tested, not fit for Indigenous contexts, and can inflict harm regardless of intent.<span><sup>21, 22</sup></span> In light of this, Māori academic Tuhiwai Smith challenges academics and clinicians to decolonise methodologies.<span><sup>21</sup></span> An Indigenous critique of Bronfenbrenner's model includes that it is anthropocentric rather than chronocentric or ecocentric, and that it is focused on the individual rather than the collective.<span><sup>23</sup></span></p><p>Fundamental concepts of childhood, and so age and developmentally appropriate participation, vary across different Indigenous cultures and often differ from Western norms.<span><sup>24</sup></span> Supporting children and young people's participation and responsibility for kin, culture and lands is a value across many Indigenous cultures.<span><sup>16</sup></span> Participation in community and cultural practices promotes Indigenous children and young people's positive sense of identity and culture and is also a determinant of Indigenous health.<span><sup>17, 25, 26</sup></span> It is important to tailor participation strategies to meet the unique needs, development, cultural norms, obligations and preferences of individual children and young people.<span><sup>4</sup></span></p><p>This article presents a case study of Koorie Youth Council (KYC) as an exemplary mechanism of young people's participation that centres self-determination. It is both youth-led and Indigenous-led. KYC is the only organisation of its kind in Australia.<span><sup>27</sup></span> It is the dedicated representative organisation for Indigenous young people living in Victoria towards the vision of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander young people collectively creating (their) future.</p><p>KYC was initially established in 2003 by the then Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Commission as the Victorian Indigenous Youth Advisory Council.<span><sup>27</sup></span> KYC receives most of its funding through a combination of government grants and partnerships, currently operating under the auspices of the Victorian Aboriginal Legal Service. KYC currently consists of an executive of 15 Indigenous young people and is staffed by nine young people, all Indigenous bar one. An all-Indigenous board also provides strong cultural and governance support.</p><p>We propose five requisites for meaningful participation. Both (i) visibility and (ii) inclusion are pre-requisites of participation; that is, being considered and in the room, in the first place.<span><sup>28</sup></span> Further, meaningful participation requires (iii) an acknowledgement of power dynamics (structural and relational); (iv) free, prior and informed consent; and (v) typically a shift of power.<span><sup>2, 10, 28, 29</sup></span></p><p>In the case of children and young people, it is important to recognise the complexities of free, prior and informed consent. Carers (kin in the case of kinship care, and non-kin in many cases of out-of-home care) and, in some cases, the state act as a delegated authority that provides consent on behalf of children and young people.<span><sup>14, 15</sup></span> Free, prior and informed consent, a key principle in UNDRIP, ensures that participation is a choice free from coercion — the freedom to choose <i>not</i> to participate.<span><sup>2, 28, 29</sup></span> Many Indigenous people would rather not participate than be restricted to tokenism. The spectrum of participation provides a salient example that the “how” for Indigenous people is as, if not more, important as the “what”.</p><p><i>Wayipunga</i>, meaning “supporting young people” in the Dja Dja Wurrung language, is a framework designed for workers, organisations and governments to facilitate culturally safe participation of Indigenous young people in decision-making processes<span><sup>4</sup></span> (Box 3). The resource was developed by KYC in response to the historical exclusion and non-participation of Indigenous young people across services. It was informed by a series of Indigenous-led, youth-led workshops across Victoria to understand the needs, barriers and enablers of Indigenous young people's meaningful participation.</p><p><i>Wayipunga</i> is structured around three sections: values, knowledge, and actions.<span><sup>4</sup></span> Values lay the foundational principles on how to respect Indigenous young people.<span><sup>4</sup></span> Knowledge provides the necessary insights for understanding their unique experiences and needs.<span><sup>4</sup></span> Actions offers practical strategies to enhance meaningful youth participation and contribution.<span><sup>4</sup></span> All three sections are interrelated and inform each other. <i>Wayipunga</i> challenges relational and structural power dynamics and reimagines accepted norms, centring Indigenous young people as experts on their own lives.</p><p>Across youth and health services there has been increasing demand for participation by diverse cohorts, following recognition of failures for these populations.<span><sup>5</sup></span> Many sectors have strived for population parity in Indigenous participation, but this neglects the disproportionate need for access to appropriate youth and health services. Indigenous children and young people have a higher likelihood of health burdens, including many diseases (such as trachoma, chronic suppurative otitis media and hearing loss, and rheumatic heart disease), developmental delay, death by suicide, and mental illness, as well as being over-represented in at-risk environments of out-of-home care and youth justice.<span><sup>7, 8, 30, 31</sup></span> This intersects with unique needs that require culturally informed support.<span><sup>4, 5, 7, 8</sup></span> The result is high demand for culturally safe clinicians, youth workers, and services.<span><sup>5, 7, 8</sup></span> It is critical to acknowledge these indicators do not signal a problem with Indigenous children and young people, but rather stem from root historical and socio-economic determinants of health and entrenched racism in colonial services and systems.<span><sup>5, 8, 10, 32</sup></span> Participation of intended users, particularly those with the greatest need and most barriers to access, should be prioritised in service design and reform.<span><sup>5, 7, 8</sup></span></p><p>The Koorie Youth Summit, organised by KYC, is an annual event created for and by Indigenous young people.<span><sup>33</sup></span> The summit is a vibrant environment for young people to connect, discuss significant issues, celebrate culture, and learn from one another. The summit emphasises cultural pride, strength and resilience, while also ensuring inclusivity and accessibility to those from regional and rural areas. These summits are also opportunities to define the unique needs of Indigenous young people, by Indigenous young people.</p><p>The power shift and meaningful participation between government and the Indigenous community-controlled sector was instrumental in the much lower coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) morbidity and mortality experienced by Indigenous Australians than expected (lower than non-Indigenous Australians).<span><sup>34</sup></span> Youth-led services have a unique understanding of use and trends of language and current technology that can be harnessed for social mobilisation and health promotion.<span><sup>35, 36</sup></span> KYC demonstrated leadership during this time with increased frequency of its peer-to-peer virtual yarning circles (on Instagram) in response to the Victorian Indigenous community's expressed need. KYC's social media accounts encouraged Indigenous young people to engage in physical distancing and get vaccinated against COVID-19 by appealing to Indigenous concepts of health, values and worldviews.</p><p>Racism contributes to poor health outcomes.<span><sup>10, 37</sup></span> Indigenous young people's high use of social media amplifies the experiences of racism.<span><sup>38</sup></span> The failed 2023 Australian national referendum on enshrining an Indigenous Voice to Parliament in the constitution saw an increase in racism experienced by Indigenous Australians.<span><sup>39</sup></span></p><p>A large proportion of the Indigenous population are children and young people; the median age of Indigenous people in Victoria is 24 years, compared with 38 years for non-Indigenous Australians.<span><sup>40</sup></span> With the voting age being 18 years, a large proportion of Indigenous Australians were disenfranchised during the 2023 Voice to Parliament referendum. They were not able to meaningfully participate in determining the outcome that most affects them, their families and communities. Although Australia permits young people aged 16 years to drive and be employed (and pay taxes), they have not been permitted meaningful participation in democratic elections.<span><sup>41</sup></span> The First Peoples’ Assembly of Victoria has lowered the voting age to 16 years, mainstream Australia is yet to follow suit.<span><sup>42</sup></span></p><p>During this tumultuous period, KYC continued yarning circles to support wellbeing. It is established that lack of cultural safety is a barrier for Indigenous young people accessing primary health and support services.<span><sup>8</sup></span> Through social media, KYC encouraged young people to seek help from within the Indigenous community and/or culturally safe health and support services (such as Aboriginal Medical Services or crisis support phoneline 13-YARN).</p><p>Although tokenistic participation (informing, consultation, placation) does little to consider and redistribute power, non-participation actively maintains the power imbalance.<span><sup>12</sup></span> Non-participation allows power holders to rubber-stamp or tick a checkbox in a process, often with an intent to educate participants rather than listen to them.<span><sup>12</sup></span> Frequently, even tokenistic participation is, in fact, performative non-participation resembling instead manipulation or coercion.</p><p>The proposed seven red flags of performative non-participation are that participation (i) is led by a non-minority group (non-Indigenous); (ii) is retrospective rather than prospective; (iii) is characterised by false urgency, without regard for the time it takes to build genuine relationships and trust; (iv) resembles informing rather than making space for dialogue; (v) is not representative of heterogeneity of minority (Indigenous) perspectives, prioritising or cherry-picking the privileged, politically aligned, or least disruptive individuals; (vi) misses those with community-recognised cultural authority; and/or (vii) where the priorities and outcomes are near or pre-determined regardless.</p><p>Tokenism is common across organisations and not limited to the participation of Indigenous people. Arnstein's ladder posits informing, consultation and placation as forms of tokenistic participation as it maintains that, without accountability mechanisms, the power holders only heed the advice the powerful deem desirable and disregard what is less desirable.<span><sup>12</sup></span> The proposed amber flags can indicate tokenistic participation. Amber flags require interrogation and often repair to move towards meaningful participation.</p><p>The proposed seven amber flags of tokenistic participation are: (i) use of buzzwords; (ii) employing a single person of the minority group; (iii) lacking an authorising environment (authority, resources or support); (iv) not valuing labour; (v) commodifying community connections and cultural knowledge; (vi) lacking culturally safe critical allies; and (vii) lacking mentorship, career progression and/or development.</p><p>To improve the health and wellbeing of Indigenous children and young people, services, organisations and governments need to support the meaningful participation of Indigenous employees. All clinicians, researchers, leaders and decision makers can shift the amber flags of tokenistic participation towards meaningful participation in conjunction with the <i>Wayipunga</i> framework, considering the following seven items.</p><p>The 2018 <i>Ngaga-dji</i> report, meaning “hear me” from Woiwurrung language of the Wurundjeri people, is an example of grassroots research and advocacy. Through group yarning circles and qualitative individual interviews, KYC amplified the voice for one of the most excluded and unheard populations in Australia. <i>Ngaga-dji</i> collects and shares the stories of Indigenous children and young people in contact with the youth justice system, in their own voices.<span><sup>11</sup></span> The report is a collective call to action to decision makers, the government, and the wider public to commit to reform and systemic change, and addresses root causes of Indigenous children and young people's over-representation within the justice system.<span><sup>11</sup></span> The three grounding principles for reform include self-determination, youth participation, and culture, family, Elders and communities.<span><sup>11</sup></span></p><p>One of the recommendations of the report to support children to become happy and healthy adults was to raise the age of the state supporting young people when leaving out-of-home-care from 18 to 21 years.<span><sup>11</sup></span> Victoria was the first state to enact this change due to collective advocacy from many communities and organisations including KYC.<span><sup>55</sup></span> Many other recommendations from the <i>Ngaga-dji</i> report have yet to be implemented.</p><p>Indigenous-led initiatives and organisations support self-determination, are trusted by communities, and are attuned to Indigenous concepts of health, values and worldviews.<span><sup>5, 8, 35</sup></span> Youth-led initiatives and organisations are well placed to define children and young people's needs and design creative, strength-based solutions.<span><sup>36</sup></span> KYC is a best-practice example of youth-led, Indigenous-led participation that centres self-determination to improve health. Given the health needs of Indigenous children and young people, there is a strong case for funding, scaling and/or replicating youth-led, Indigenous-led models such as KYC in other regions.</p><p>Shifting from performative non-participation and tokenism towards meaningful participation is an essential part of creating more culturally safe services to improve the health of Indigenous children and young people. This involves redistributing power, shared decision making, and genuine partnership based on respect.<span><sup>4, 5, 8, 13, 56</sup></span> It is the work of all decision makers, clinicians, researchers and leaders to ensure Indigenous children and young people are heard and at decision-making tables to help create their own healthy futures.</p><p>No relevant disclosures.</p><p>Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.</p>","PeriodicalId":18214,"journal":{"name":"Medical Journal of Australia","volume":"221 S10","pages":"S26-S33"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.5694/mja2.52490","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Journal of Australia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.5694/mja2.52490","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Participation is widely recognised as a determinant of children and young people's health.1 Both the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP) (Article 18) and the Convention on the Rights of the Child (Article 12) enshrine participation as an inalienable right.2, 3 Despite this, the exclusion and non-participation of Indigenous children, adolescents and young people persists.4

Indigenous children and young people experience worse health outcomes than their non-Indigenous peers and are starkly over-represented in the contact with youth justice and in out-of-home care.5-7 We propose this is in part due to their exclusion and non-participation — both as children and as Indigenous people.4, 5, 7 These children and young people's stories are often told for them, if at all.4 “It didn't matter what I screamed at (Child Protection Services), they wanted to tell my story for me, decide for me, know what was best for me. That's easier than listening, isn't it?”, said one Indigenous young person in contact with the youth justice system.6

Indigenous young people are less likely to access primary health services despite having more health needs than non-Indigenous counterparts.8 Most children and young people in the youth justice system have severe neurodevelopmental disorders — nearly all previously undiagnosed and untreated.9 Current mainstream health and youth services are failing to provide culturally safe rudimentary services and meet Indigenous children and young people's unique needs.5, 7, 8, 10 They have not been designed with meaningful participation of Indigenous people, let alone children and young people.5, 8 There is an urgency for meaningful participation of Indigenous children and young people in reform.4, 7, 8 There is an urgency for decision makers to listen and act.4, 5, 7, 8

Best-practice mechanisms like the case study provided in this article, the Victorian based youth-led, Indigenous-led Koorie Youth Council, which centres self-determination, can ensure that Indigenous children and young people are empowered.4 This article is part of the 2024 MJA supplement for the Future Healthy Countdown 2030, which examines how participating affects the health and wellbeing of children, young people and future generations. Society must not only uphold Indigenous children and young people's rights, but also value their strengths and the expertise they hold about their own lives.4, 5, 7, 8, 11

Participation is not a binary, it exists on a spectrum indicating the degree of agency afforded to individuals or groups to relationally determine outcomes.12, 13 The degree of agency is the extent to which individuals can exercise freedom to determine their own outcomes, intersecting with the extent others exert power (and control) over them.14 Arnstein's ladder describes participation as ranging from manipulation to degrees of tokenism, through to citizen control or, in the language of UNDRIP, self-determination (Box 1).2, 12 In 1992, Hart adapted Arnstein's ladder of participation recognising adults as the relational power-holders over children and young people.15 Developmentally, participation also allows children and young people the opportunity to practise agency, assess relational power dynamics, and invite others to participate in mutual causes.14, 15

Indigenous concepts of health describe more than the physical status of an individual; they are collectivist and inclusive of “the social, emotional, and cultural wellbeing of the whole community”.16, 17 Health exists not as a moment in time, but is a whole-of-life view.16 Indigenous concepts of health are intrinsically relational and include not just anthropocentric relationships to family, kin and community, but to history, Country, lands, spirituality and culture.17-19 Children and young people do not exist in isolation, but as Bronfenbrenner's ecological model describes, are influenced by the context around them (Box 2).20 Participation, or children and young people's relational agency across the ecological system, is a key determinant of Indigenous health.7, 17

Although Bronfenbrenner's ecological system model provides a valuable conceptual framework for considering relational agency, it should also be acknowledged that it was developed with ontological and epistemological foundations insufficient to capture Indigenous ways of knowing, being and doing. This is an unfortunate commonality among many mainstream youth social and health frameworks.16, 21, 22 They are often not cross-culturally developed or tested, not fit for Indigenous contexts, and can inflict harm regardless of intent.21, 22 In light of this, Māori academic Tuhiwai Smith challenges academics and clinicians to decolonise methodologies.21 An Indigenous critique of Bronfenbrenner's model includes that it is anthropocentric rather than chronocentric or ecocentric, and that it is focused on the individual rather than the collective.23

Fundamental concepts of childhood, and so age and developmentally appropriate participation, vary across different Indigenous cultures and often differ from Western norms.24 Supporting children and young people's participation and responsibility for kin, culture and lands is a value across many Indigenous cultures.16 Participation in community and cultural practices promotes Indigenous children and young people's positive sense of identity and culture and is also a determinant of Indigenous health.17, 25, 26 It is important to tailor participation strategies to meet the unique needs, development, cultural norms, obligations and preferences of individual children and young people.4

This article presents a case study of Koorie Youth Council (KYC) as an exemplary mechanism of young people's participation that centres self-determination. It is both youth-led and Indigenous-led. KYC is the only organisation of its kind in Australia.27 It is the dedicated representative organisation for Indigenous young people living in Victoria towards the vision of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander young people collectively creating (their) future.

KYC was initially established in 2003 by the then Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Commission as the Victorian Indigenous Youth Advisory Council.27 KYC receives most of its funding through a combination of government grants and partnerships, currently operating under the auspices of the Victorian Aboriginal Legal Service. KYC currently consists of an executive of 15 Indigenous young people and is staffed by nine young people, all Indigenous bar one. An all-Indigenous board also provides strong cultural and governance support.

We propose five requisites for meaningful participation. Both (i) visibility and (ii) inclusion are pre-requisites of participation; that is, being considered and in the room, in the first place.28 Further, meaningful participation requires (iii) an acknowledgement of power dynamics (structural and relational); (iv) free, prior and informed consent; and (v) typically a shift of power.2, 10, 28, 29

In the case of children and young people, it is important to recognise the complexities of free, prior and informed consent. Carers (kin in the case of kinship care, and non-kin in many cases of out-of-home care) and, in some cases, the state act as a delegated authority that provides consent on behalf of children and young people.14, 15 Free, prior and informed consent, a key principle in UNDRIP, ensures that participation is a choice free from coercion — the freedom to choose not to participate.2, 28, 29 Many Indigenous people would rather not participate than be restricted to tokenism. The spectrum of participation provides a salient example that the “how” for Indigenous people is as, if not more, important as the “what”.

Wayipunga, meaning “supporting young people” in the Dja Dja Wurrung language, is a framework designed for workers, organisations and governments to facilitate culturally safe participation of Indigenous young people in decision-making processes4 (Box 3). The resource was developed by KYC in response to the historical exclusion and non-participation of Indigenous young people across services. It was informed by a series of Indigenous-led, youth-led workshops across Victoria to understand the needs, barriers and enablers of Indigenous young people's meaningful participation.

Wayipunga is structured around three sections: values, knowledge, and actions.4 Values lay the foundational principles on how to respect Indigenous young people.4 Knowledge provides the necessary insights for understanding their unique experiences and needs.4 Actions offers practical strategies to enhance meaningful youth participation and contribution.4 All three sections are interrelated and inform each other. Wayipunga challenges relational and structural power dynamics and reimagines accepted norms, centring Indigenous young people as experts on their own lives.

Across youth and health services there has been increasing demand for participation by diverse cohorts, following recognition of failures for these populations.5 Many sectors have strived for population parity in Indigenous participation, but this neglects the disproportionate need for access to appropriate youth and health services. Indigenous children and young people have a higher likelihood of health burdens, including many diseases (such as trachoma, chronic suppurative otitis media and hearing loss, and rheumatic heart disease), developmental delay, death by suicide, and mental illness, as well as being over-represented in at-risk environments of out-of-home care and youth justice.7, 8, 30, 31 This intersects with unique needs that require culturally informed support.4, 5, 7, 8 The result is high demand for culturally safe clinicians, youth workers, and services.5, 7, 8 It is critical to acknowledge these indicators do not signal a problem with Indigenous children and young people, but rather stem from root historical and socio-economic determinants of health and entrenched racism in colonial services and systems.5, 8, 10, 32 Participation of intended users, particularly those with the greatest need and most barriers to access, should be prioritised in service design and reform.5, 7, 8

The Koorie Youth Summit, organised by KYC, is an annual event created for and by Indigenous young people.33 The summit is a vibrant environment for young people to connect, discuss significant issues, celebrate culture, and learn from one another. The summit emphasises cultural pride, strength and resilience, while also ensuring inclusivity and accessibility to those from regional and rural areas. These summits are also opportunities to define the unique needs of Indigenous young people, by Indigenous young people.

The power shift and meaningful participation between government and the Indigenous community-controlled sector was instrumental in the much lower coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) morbidity and mortality experienced by Indigenous Australians than expected (lower than non-Indigenous Australians).34 Youth-led services have a unique understanding of use and trends of language and current technology that can be harnessed for social mobilisation and health promotion.35, 36 KYC demonstrated leadership during this time with increased frequency of its peer-to-peer virtual yarning circles (on Instagram) in response to the Victorian Indigenous community's expressed need. KYC's social media accounts encouraged Indigenous young people to engage in physical distancing and get vaccinated against COVID-19 by appealing to Indigenous concepts of health, values and worldviews.

Racism contributes to poor health outcomes.10, 37 Indigenous young people's high use of social media amplifies the experiences of racism.38 The failed 2023 Australian national referendum on enshrining an Indigenous Voice to Parliament in the constitution saw an increase in racism experienced by Indigenous Australians.39

A large proportion of the Indigenous population are children and young people; the median age of Indigenous people in Victoria is 24 years, compared with 38 years for non-Indigenous Australians.40 With the voting age being 18 years, a large proportion of Indigenous Australians were disenfranchised during the 2023 Voice to Parliament referendum. They were not able to meaningfully participate in determining the outcome that most affects them, their families and communities. Although Australia permits young people aged 16 years to drive and be employed (and pay taxes), they have not been permitted meaningful participation in democratic elections.41 The First Peoples’ Assembly of Victoria has lowered the voting age to 16 years, mainstream Australia is yet to follow suit.42

During this tumultuous period, KYC continued yarning circles to support wellbeing. It is established that lack of cultural safety is a barrier for Indigenous young people accessing primary health and support services.8 Through social media, KYC encouraged young people to seek help from within the Indigenous community and/or culturally safe health and support services (such as Aboriginal Medical Services or crisis support phoneline 13-YARN).

Although tokenistic participation (informing, consultation, placation) does little to consider and redistribute power, non-participation actively maintains the power imbalance.12 Non-participation allows power holders to rubber-stamp or tick a checkbox in a process, often with an intent to educate participants rather than listen to them.12 Frequently, even tokenistic participation is, in fact, performative non-participation resembling instead manipulation or coercion.

The proposed seven red flags of performative non-participation are that participation (i) is led by a non-minority group (non-Indigenous); (ii) is retrospective rather than prospective; (iii) is characterised by false urgency, without regard for the time it takes to build genuine relationships and trust; (iv) resembles informing rather than making space for dialogue; (v) is not representative of heterogeneity of minority (Indigenous) perspectives, prioritising or cherry-picking the privileged, politically aligned, or least disruptive individuals; (vi) misses those with community-recognised cultural authority; and/or (vii) where the priorities and outcomes are near or pre-determined regardless.

Tokenism is common across organisations and not limited to the participation of Indigenous people. Arnstein's ladder posits informing, consultation and placation as forms of tokenistic participation as it maintains that, without accountability mechanisms, the power holders only heed the advice the powerful deem desirable and disregard what is less desirable.12 The proposed amber flags can indicate tokenistic participation. Amber flags require interrogation and often repair to move towards meaningful participation.

The proposed seven amber flags of tokenistic participation are: (i) use of buzzwords; (ii) employing a single person of the minority group; (iii) lacking an authorising environment (authority, resources or support); (iv) not valuing labour; (v) commodifying community connections and cultural knowledge; (vi) lacking culturally safe critical allies; and (vii) lacking mentorship, career progression and/or development.

To improve the health and wellbeing of Indigenous children and young people, services, organisations and governments need to support the meaningful participation of Indigenous employees. All clinicians, researchers, leaders and decision makers can shift the amber flags of tokenistic participation towards meaningful participation in conjunction with the Wayipunga framework, considering the following seven items.

The 2018 Ngaga-dji report, meaning “hear me” from Woiwurrung language of the Wurundjeri people, is an example of grassroots research and advocacy. Through group yarning circles and qualitative individual interviews, KYC amplified the voice for one of the most excluded and unheard populations in Australia. Ngaga-dji collects and shares the stories of Indigenous children and young people in contact with the youth justice system, in their own voices.11 The report is a collective call to action to decision makers, the government, and the wider public to commit to reform and systemic change, and addresses root causes of Indigenous children and young people's over-representation within the justice system.11 The three grounding principles for reform include self-determination, youth participation, and culture, family, Elders and communities.11

One of the recommendations of the report to support children to become happy and healthy adults was to raise the age of the state supporting young people when leaving out-of-home-care from 18 to 21 years.11 Victoria was the first state to enact this change due to collective advocacy from many communities and organisations including KYC.55 Many other recommendations from the Ngaga-dji report have yet to be implemented.

Indigenous-led initiatives and organisations support self-determination, are trusted by communities, and are attuned to Indigenous concepts of health, values and worldviews.5, 8, 35 Youth-led initiatives and organisations are well placed to define children and young people's needs and design creative, strength-based solutions.36 KYC is a best-practice example of youth-led, Indigenous-led participation that centres self-determination to improve health. Given the health needs of Indigenous children and young people, there is a strong case for funding, scaling and/or replicating youth-led, Indigenous-led models such as KYC in other regions.

Shifting from performative non-participation and tokenism towards meaningful participation is an essential part of creating more culturally safe services to improve the health of Indigenous children and young people. This involves redistributing power, shared decision making, and genuine partnership based on respect.4, 5, 8, 13, 56 It is the work of all decision makers, clinicians, researchers and leaders to ensure Indigenous children and young people are heard and at decision-making tables to help create their own healthy futures.

No relevant disclosures.

Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

Abstract Image

土著儿童和青年参与改善健康和福祉。
1 《联合国土著人民权利宣言》(UNDRIP)(第 18 条)和《儿童权利公约》(第 12 条)都将参与视为一项不可剥夺的权利。2, 3 尽管如此,土著儿童、青少年和年轻人被排斥和不参与的现象依然存在。4 与非土著同龄人相比,土著儿童和青少年的健康状况更差,与青少年司法机构接触和接受家庭外照料的人数明显过多。5-7 我们认为,部分原因在于他们作为儿童和土著人被排斥和不参与、4 "我对(儿童保护服务机构)大喊大叫并不重要,他们想替我讲述我的故事,替我做决定,知道什么对我最好。6 尽管土著青少年比非土著青少年有更多的健康需求,但他们获得初级医疗服务的可能性较低。8 青少年司法系统中的大多数儿童和青少年都有严重的神经发育障碍--几乎所有的人以前都未被诊断和治疗。目前的主流保健和青年服务未能提供文化上安全的基本服务,也未能满足土著儿童和青 年的独特需求、8当务之急是让土著儿童和青年切实参与改革。4、5、7、8当务之急是让决策者倾听并采取行动。4、5、7、8最佳实践机制,如本文提供的案例研究--以维多利亚州青年为基础、以土著为主导、以自决为中心的 Koorie 青年理事会--可以确保土著儿童和青年获得权力。本文是 2024 年 MJA 为《2030 年未来健康倒计时》(Future Healthy Countdown 2030)所做补充的一部分。社会不仅要维护土著儿童和青少年的权利,还要重视他们的力量以及他们对自己生活所掌握的专业知识。参与不是二元对立的,它存在于一个范围内,表明赋予个人或群体以关系决定结果的代理程度。12 1992 年,哈特对阿恩斯坦的参与阶梯进行了改编,承认成人是儿童和青少年的关系 权力持有者。15 从发展的角度看,参与也使儿童和青少年有机会实践代理权、评估关系 权力动态并邀请他人参与共同事业、16 土著人的健康概念本质上是关系性的,不仅包括以人类为中心的与家庭、亲属和社 区的关系,还包括与历史、国家、土地、精神和文化的关系。儿童和青少年并不是孤立存在的,正如布朗芬布伦纳的生态模型所描述的,他们受到周围环境的影响(方框 2)。20 参与,或儿童和青少年在生态系统中的关系代理,是土著健康的一个关键决定因素。这是许多主流青年社会和健康框架的共同点,令人遗憾。16, 21, 22 这些框架通常没有经过跨文化发展或测试,不适合土著环境,而且无论意图如何,都可能造成伤害、22 有鉴于此,毛利学者图希瓦伊-史密斯(Tuhiwai Smith)向学者和临床医 生提出挑战,要求他们对方法论进行去殖民化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Medical Journal of Australia
Medical Journal of Australia 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
5.30%
发文量
410
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Medical Journal of Australia (MJA) stands as Australia's foremost general medical journal, leading the dissemination of high-quality research and commentary to shape health policy and influence medical practices within the country. Under the leadership of Professor Virginia Barbour, the expert editorial team at MJA is dedicated to providing authors with a constructive and collaborative peer-review and publication process. Established in 1914, the MJA has evolved into a modern journal that upholds its founding values, maintaining a commitment to supporting the medical profession by delivering high-quality and pertinent information essential to medical practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信