A Network Meta-Analysis of Vasodilator Therapies in Pulmonary Hypertension Patients Undergoing Mitral Valve Replacement Surgery: Insights for Optimizing Hemodynamics.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Amr Elrosasy, Ahmed Maher, Abdelraouf Ramadan, Nada G Hamam, Mohamed Soliman, Sara K Kamal, Beshoy Emad Milik, Abdullah Ali Shahat, Menna Nabil Kamel, Ahmed Abdeltawab Ali, Loay Abdelnabi Hassan, Ahmed Zabady, Mohamed Abo Zeid, Wael Abdelmottaleb, Sameh Nassar
{"title":"A Network Meta-Analysis of Vasodilator Therapies in Pulmonary Hypertension Patients Undergoing Mitral Valve Replacement Surgery: Insights for Optimizing Hemodynamics.","authors":"Amr Elrosasy, Ahmed Maher, Abdelraouf Ramadan, Nada G Hamam, Mohamed Soliman, Sara K Kamal, Beshoy Emad Milik, Abdullah Ali Shahat, Menna Nabil Kamel, Ahmed Abdeltawab Ali, Loay Abdelnabi Hassan, Ahmed Zabady, Mohamed Abo Zeid, Wael Abdelmottaleb, Sameh Nassar","doi":"10.1007/s40261-024-01404-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is a progressive hemodynamic condition associated with significant morbidity and mortality, especially in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Therefore, the objective of this network meta-analysis (NMA) is to compare the efficacy of various pulmonary vasodilators in perioperative control of PH among patients undergoing mitral valve replacement surgery (MVRS), aiming to address the existing knowledge gap and improve perioperative outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Electronic databases including PubMed, Cochrane Central Registry of Controlled Trials, Scopus, Embase, and Web of Science (WOS) from inception to 17 September 2024. Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating vasodilators in PH patients undergoing MVRS were included. We used netmeta package in RStudio to analyze the outcome data with their corresponding mean difference (MD) and confidence intervals (CI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventeen RCTs including 862 patients were analyzed. Prostacyclin, nitric oxide (NO), and sodium nitroprusside (SN) significantly reduced mean pulmonary arterial pressure with effect sizes [MD, 95% confidence interval (CI)] of (11.77, - 18.78; - 4.76; - 8.3, - 15.9; - 0.6; - 11.02, - 20.1; - 3.8, respectively). While no treatment showed significant efficacy on pulmonary capillary wedge pressure, systolic pulmonary arterial pressure, or heart rate, nitroglycerin, NO, and prostacyclin, showed significant increases in cardiac index with effect sizes (MD, 95% CI) of (1, 0.3; 1.7; 1.2 0.8; 1.6; 1.2 0.8; 1.6, respectively). Additionally, NO, prostacyclin, SN, and nitroglycerin demonstrated significant reductions in systemic vascular resistance (SVR), with effect sizes of. (- 0.54, - 0.82; - 0.26, - 0.37, - 0.65; - 0.09; - 0.47, - 0.77; - 0.16; - 0.14, - 0.24; - 0.03, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This NMA highlights prostacyclin, nitroglycerin, NO, and SN as consistently effective in improving hemodynamics for patients with PH undergoing MVRS, and provides valuable insights for surgeons to choose the suitable vasodilator for these surgeries. However, limitations and the need for further RCTs are acknowledged.</p>","PeriodicalId":10402,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Drug Investigation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Drug Investigation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40261-024-01404-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objective: Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is a progressive hemodynamic condition associated with significant morbidity and mortality, especially in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Therefore, the objective of this network meta-analysis (NMA) is to compare the efficacy of various pulmonary vasodilators in perioperative control of PH among patients undergoing mitral valve replacement surgery (MVRS), aiming to address the existing knowledge gap and improve perioperative outcomes.

Methods: Electronic databases including PubMed, Cochrane Central Registry of Controlled Trials, Scopus, Embase, and Web of Science (WOS) from inception to 17 September 2024. Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating vasodilators in PH patients undergoing MVRS were included. We used netmeta package in RStudio to analyze the outcome data with their corresponding mean difference (MD) and confidence intervals (CI).

Results: Seventeen RCTs including 862 patients were analyzed. Prostacyclin, nitric oxide (NO), and sodium nitroprusside (SN) significantly reduced mean pulmonary arterial pressure with effect sizes [MD, 95% confidence interval (CI)] of (11.77, - 18.78; - 4.76; - 8.3, - 15.9; - 0.6; - 11.02, - 20.1; - 3.8, respectively). While no treatment showed significant efficacy on pulmonary capillary wedge pressure, systolic pulmonary arterial pressure, or heart rate, nitroglycerin, NO, and prostacyclin, showed significant increases in cardiac index with effect sizes (MD, 95% CI) of (1, 0.3; 1.7; 1.2 0.8; 1.6; 1.2 0.8; 1.6, respectively). Additionally, NO, prostacyclin, SN, and nitroglycerin demonstrated significant reductions in systemic vascular resistance (SVR), with effect sizes of. (- 0.54, - 0.82; - 0.26, - 0.37, - 0.65; - 0.09; - 0.47, - 0.77; - 0.16; - 0.14, - 0.24; - 0.03, respectively).

Conclusions: This NMA highlights prostacyclin, nitroglycerin, NO, and SN as consistently effective in improving hemodynamics for patients with PH undergoing MVRS, and provides valuable insights for surgeons to choose the suitable vasodilator for these surgeries. However, limitations and the need for further RCTs are acknowledged.

对接受二尖瓣置换手术的肺动脉高压患者使用血管扩张剂治疗的网络 Meta 分析:优化血液动力学的启示。
背景和目的:肺动脉高压(PH)是一种进展性血流动力学疾病,与严重的发病率和死亡率有关,尤其是在接受心脏手术的患者中。因此,本网络荟萃分析(NMA)的目的是比较各种肺血管扩张剂对二尖瓣置换手术(MVRS)患者围手术期控制 PH 的疗效,以弥补现有的知识差距并改善围手术期的预后:电子数据库,包括 PubMed、Cochrane Central Registry of Controlled Trials、Scopus、Embase 和 Web of Science (WOS),从开始到 2024 年 9 月 17 日。仅纳入了对接受 MVRS 的 PH 患者使用血管扩张剂进行评估的随机对照试验(RCT)。我们使用 RStudio 中的 netmeta 软件包分析了结果数据及其相应的平均差(MD)和置信区间(CI):结果:分析了包括 862 名患者在内的 17 项 RCT。前列环素、一氧化氮(NO)和硝普钠(SN)可显著降低平均肺动脉压,其效应大小[MD,95% 置信区间(CI)]分别为(11.77,- 18.78;- 4.76;- 8.3,- 15.9;- 0.6;- 11.02,- 20.1;- 3.8)。虽然没有一种治疗方法对肺毛细血管楔压、肺动脉收缩压或心率有明显疗效,但硝酸甘油、NO 和前列环素却能显著增加心脏指数,其效应大小(MD,95% CI)分别为(1,0.3;1.7;1.2 0.8;1.6;1.2 0.8;1.6)。此外,NO、前列环素、SN 和硝酸甘油均可显著降低全身血管阻力(SVR),其效应大小分别为(- 0.54、- 0.54、- 0.54、- 0.54)。(分别为:- 0.54,- 0.82;- 0.26,- 0.37,- 0.65;- 0.09;- 0.47,- 0.77;- 0.16;- 0.14,- 0.24;- 0.03):该NMA突出显示了前列环素、硝酸甘油、NO和SN在改善接受MVRS的PH患者血液动力学方面的持续有效性,并为外科医生为这些手术选择合适的血管扩张剂提供了有价值的见解。然而,该研究还存在局限性,需要进一步开展研究性试验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
3.10%
发文量
108
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Drug Investigation provides rapid publication of original research covering all phases of clinical drug development and therapeutic use of drugs. The Journal includes: -Clinical trials, outcomes research, clinical pharmacoeconomic studies and pharmacoepidemiology studies with a strong link to optimum prescribing practice for a drug or group of drugs. -Clinical pharmacodynamic and clinical pharmacokinetic studies with a strong link to clinical practice. -Pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic studies in healthy volunteers in which significant implications for clinical prescribing are discussed. -Studies focusing on the application of drug delivery technology in healthcare. -Short communications and case study reports that meet the above criteria will also be considered. Additional digital features (including animated abstracts, video abstracts, slide decks, audio slides, instructional videos, infographics, podcasts and animations) can be published with articles; these are designed to increase the visibility, readership and educational value of the journal’s content. In addition, articles published in Clinical Drug Investigation may be accompanied by plain language summaries to assist readers who have some knowledge, but non in-depth expertise in, the area to understand important medical advances.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信