Law libraries, copyright and digital lending

IF 0.7 Q2 LAW
Aishwarya Chaturvedi
{"title":"Law libraries, copyright and digital lending","authors":"Aishwarya Chaturvedi","doi":"10.1111/jwip.12315","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The article titled “Law Libraries, Copyright and Digital Lending” aims to bring to the fore copyright issues related with digital lending by law libraries and is a comparative study of the copyright law of India and the United States. Accordingly, this piece will analyze the situation in two jurisdictions—India and the United States to understand the facilitation of digital lending by law libraries, particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic. It will look at some key concepts such as publication, distribution, reproduction, controlled digital lending, fair use, fair dealing, public interest, exhaustion, and copyright infringement. To understand the practice of digital lending by law libraries in India and controlled digital lending in the United States the author interviewed a few librarians from both countries and learnt about the challenges faced by librarians to facilitate digital lending. The author also learnt that while librarians in the United States practice controlled digital lending, librarians in India do not; they practice only digital lending. Testimonies of librarians and analysis of the present law and precedents in India and the United States led the author to understand that there is no concrete law on digital lending by law libraries at present in the two jurisdictions. Accordingly, this article discusses the utility and necessity of digital lending by law libraries in the present times, as also that of controlled digital lending.</p>","PeriodicalId":54129,"journal":{"name":"Journal of World Intellectual Property","volume":"27 3","pages":"515-531"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of World Intellectual Property","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jwip.12315","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article titled “Law Libraries, Copyright and Digital Lending” aims to bring to the fore copyright issues related with digital lending by law libraries and is a comparative study of the copyright law of India and the United States. Accordingly, this piece will analyze the situation in two jurisdictions—India and the United States to understand the facilitation of digital lending by law libraries, particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic. It will look at some key concepts such as publication, distribution, reproduction, controlled digital lending, fair use, fair dealing, public interest, exhaustion, and copyright infringement. To understand the practice of digital lending by law libraries in India and controlled digital lending in the United States the author interviewed a few librarians from both countries and learnt about the challenges faced by librarians to facilitate digital lending. The author also learnt that while librarians in the United States practice controlled digital lending, librarians in India do not; they practice only digital lending. Testimonies of librarians and analysis of the present law and precedents in India and the United States led the author to understand that there is no concrete law on digital lending by law libraries at present in the two jurisdictions. Accordingly, this article discusses the utility and necessity of digital lending by law libraries in the present times, as also that of controlled digital lending.

法律图书馆、版权和数字借阅
这篇题为 "法律图书馆、版权和数字借阅 "的文章旨在突出与法律图书馆数字借阅有关的版权问题,并对印度和美国的版权法进行比较研究。因此,本文将分析印度和美国两个司法管辖区的情况,以了解法律图书馆为数字借阅提供的便利,尤其是在 COVID-19 大流行期间。本报告将探讨一些关键概念,如出版、发行、复制、受控数字借阅、合理使用、合理交易、公共利益、穷竭和版权侵权。为了了解印度法律图书馆的数字借阅实践和美国的受控数字借阅,作者采访了两国的一些图书馆员,了解到图书馆员在促进数字借阅方面所面临的挑战。作者还了解到,美国的图书馆员实行有控制的数字借阅,而印度的图书馆员则没有,他们只实行数字借阅。图书馆员的证词以及对印度和美国现行法律和先例的分析使作者了解到,目前这两个司法管辖区都没有关于法律图书馆数字借阅的具体法律。因此,本文讨论了当前法律图书馆数字借阅的实用性和必要性,以及有控制的数字借阅。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
43
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信