Edge Influence in a Semi-Deciduous Tropical Forest: An Investigation of Soil Organic Carbon Fractions

IF 1.5 Q4 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Patrícia Anjos Bittencourt Barreto-Garcia, Francielle da Silva Lopes, Paulo Henrique Marques Monroe, Alessandro de Paula, Kyegla Beatriz da Silva Martins, Marcio Renato Nunes
{"title":"Edge Influence in a Semi-Deciduous Tropical Forest: An Investigation of Soil Organic Carbon Fractions","authors":"Patrícia Anjos Bittencourt Barreto-Garcia,&nbsp;Francielle da Silva Lopes,&nbsp;Paulo Henrique Marques Monroe,&nbsp;Alessandro de Paula,&nbsp;Kyegla Beatriz da Silva Martins,&nbsp;Marcio Renato Nunes","doi":"10.1002/tqem.22354","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Recent studies have proven the sensitivity of soil organic carbon (SOC) in responding to variations imposed by tropical forest fragmentation, which may reflect changes in both its quantity and quality. Despite this, studies evaluating soil carbon fractions as an edge effect indicator are still non-existent. We developed this work asking: How do the oxidizable fractions of soil organic carbon (OFSOC) respond to the edge effect in fragments of semi-deciduous seasonal forest? Is this response influenced by the size of the forest fragment? The study was conducted in Vitória da Conquista, Bahia, Brazil, in three forest fragments with different sizes. Thus, three sampling sections were defined in each fragment: edge (0–10 m), transition (40–50 m), and interior. Soil samples were collected at a depth of 0–10 cm. The SOC was divided into three fractions (LC—labile carbon, MLC—moderately labile carbon, and LLC—low labile carbon), adopting the chemical method based on oxidation degrees. Reductions in the SOC (28.2%), LC (17.4%), and MLC content (66.7%) were observed at the edge in the small fragment. There was a reduction of SOC (21.3%) and LLC (39.0%) at the edge in the medium fragment, while MLC showed an increase at the edge (70.4%). The OFSOC were able to respond to the changes imposed by the edge effect, with emphasis on the LC and MLC fractions in smaller fragments. The forest fragment size influenced the level of changes caused by the edge effect in OFSOC, showing greater susceptibility in smaller fragments.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":35327,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Quality Management","volume":"34 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Quality Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/tqem.22354","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Recent studies have proven the sensitivity of soil organic carbon (SOC) in responding to variations imposed by tropical forest fragmentation, which may reflect changes in both its quantity and quality. Despite this, studies evaluating soil carbon fractions as an edge effect indicator are still non-existent. We developed this work asking: How do the oxidizable fractions of soil organic carbon (OFSOC) respond to the edge effect in fragments of semi-deciduous seasonal forest? Is this response influenced by the size of the forest fragment? The study was conducted in Vitória da Conquista, Bahia, Brazil, in three forest fragments with different sizes. Thus, three sampling sections were defined in each fragment: edge (0–10 m), transition (40–50 m), and interior. Soil samples were collected at a depth of 0–10 cm. The SOC was divided into three fractions (LC—labile carbon, MLC—moderately labile carbon, and LLC—low labile carbon), adopting the chemical method based on oxidation degrees. Reductions in the SOC (28.2%), LC (17.4%), and MLC content (66.7%) were observed at the edge in the small fragment. There was a reduction of SOC (21.3%) and LLC (39.0%) at the edge in the medium fragment, while MLC showed an increase at the edge (70.4%). The OFSOC were able to respond to the changes imposed by the edge effect, with emphasis on the LC and MLC fractions in smaller fragments. The forest fragment size influenced the level of changes caused by the edge effect in OFSOC, showing greater susceptibility in smaller fragments.

Abstract Image

半落叶热带森林的边缘影响:土壤有机碳组分调查
最近的研究证明,土壤有机碳(SOC)对热带森林破碎化带来的变化非常敏感,这可能反映了其数量和质量的变化。尽管如此,将土壤碳组分作为边缘效应指标进行评估的研究仍不存在。我们在这项工作中提出了以下问题:土壤有机碳的可氧化组分(OFSOC)如何对半落叶季节性森林破碎带的边缘效应做出反应?这种反应是否受森林片段大小的影响?这项研究在巴西巴伊亚州维托里亚-达孔奎斯塔(Vitória da Conquista)的三个不同大小的森林片断中进行。因此,在每个片段中定义了三个采样区:边缘(0-10 米)、过渡区(40-50 米)和内部。土壤样本采集深度为 0-10 厘米。采用基于氧化度的化学方法,将 SOC 分成三个部分(LC-易变碳、MLC-中度易变碳和 LLC-低易变碳)。在小碎片的边缘观察到 SOC(28.2%)、LC(17.4%)和 MLC 含量(66.7%)的减少。在中等片段的边缘,SOC(21.3%)和 LLC(39.0%)含量减少,而 MLC 在边缘则有所增加(70.4%)。OFSOC 能够对边缘效应带来的变化做出反应,重点是较小片段中的 LC 和 MLC 部分。森林片段的大小影响了边缘效应对 OFSOC 所造成的变化程度,较小的片段显示出更大的易感性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Environmental Quality Management
Environmental Quality Management Environmental Science-Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
94
期刊介绍: Four times a year, this practical journal shows you how to improve environmental performance and exceed voluntary standards such as ISO 14000. In each issue, you"ll find in-depth articles and the most current case studies of successful environmental quality improvement efforts -- and guidance on how you can apply these goals to your organization. Written by leading industry experts and practitioners, Environmental Quality Management brings you innovative practices in Performance Measurement...Life-Cycle Assessments...Safety Management... Environmental Auditing...ISO 14000 Standards and Certification..."Green Accounting"...Environmental Communication...Sustainable Development Issues...Environmental Benchmarking...Global Environmental Law and Regulation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信