Rakshit Kumar Jain, Carol K. Hall and Erik E. Santiso*,
{"title":"In Silico Structural Comparison of Aromatic and Aliphatic Chiral Peptoid Oligomers","authors":"Rakshit Kumar Jain, Carol K. Hall and Erik E. Santiso*, ","doi":"10.1021/acs.jpcb.4c0657710.1021/acs.jpcb.4c06577","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Atomistic simulations of peptoids have the capability to predict structure–property relationships, depending on the accuracy of the associated force field. This work presents an addendum to the CGenFF-NTOID peptoid force field for aliphatic side chains. We develop parameters for two aliphatic side chains, R<sub><i>N</i></sub>1-tertiary butylethyl glycine (<i>r1tbe</i>) and S<sub><i>N</i></sub>1-tertiary butylethyl glycine (<i>s1tbe</i>). Enhanced sampled (well-tempered metadynamics) atomistic simulations are performed using CGenFF-NTOID to determine the monomer structural preferences for these side chains. The free energy minima attained through these simulations are compared with structural observations obtained from experiments. We also compare the structural preferences of aliphatic <i>s1tbe</i> and aromatic S<sub><i>N</i></sub>1-naphthylethyl glycine (<i>s1ne</i>). This is done through parallel bias metadynamics on monomers and pentamers of <i>s1tbe</i> and <i>s1ne</i>. The structural observations through simulations are also compared with available experimental metrics of the dihedral angles and pitch. The pentamer minima structures are also compared with <i>ab initio</i> optimized structures, which show excellent agreement. This comparison illustrates alternatives to aromatic side chains that can be used to stabilize peptoid secondary structures. The developed parameters help to increase the diversity of peptoid side chains available for materials discovery through computational studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":60,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Physical Chemistry B","volume":"128 45","pages":"11164–11173 11164–11173"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Physical Chemistry B","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jpcb.4c06577","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Atomistic simulations of peptoids have the capability to predict structure–property relationships, depending on the accuracy of the associated force field. This work presents an addendum to the CGenFF-NTOID peptoid force field for aliphatic side chains. We develop parameters for two aliphatic side chains, RN1-tertiary butylethyl glycine (r1tbe) and SN1-tertiary butylethyl glycine (s1tbe). Enhanced sampled (well-tempered metadynamics) atomistic simulations are performed using CGenFF-NTOID to determine the monomer structural preferences for these side chains. The free energy minima attained through these simulations are compared with structural observations obtained from experiments. We also compare the structural preferences of aliphatic s1tbe and aromatic SN1-naphthylethyl glycine (s1ne). This is done through parallel bias metadynamics on monomers and pentamers of s1tbe and s1ne. The structural observations through simulations are also compared with available experimental metrics of the dihedral angles and pitch. The pentamer minima structures are also compared with ab initio optimized structures, which show excellent agreement. This comparison illustrates alternatives to aromatic side chains that can be used to stabilize peptoid secondary structures. The developed parameters help to increase the diversity of peptoid side chains available for materials discovery through computational studies.
期刊介绍:
An essential criterion for acceptance of research articles in the journal is that they provide new physical insight. Please refer to the New Physical Insights virtual issue on what constitutes new physical insight. Manuscripts that are essentially reporting data or applications of data are, in general, not suitable for publication in JPC B.