Multidisciplinary Inpatient Community Rehabilitation Programmes for Frail Older People: A Scoping Review.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING
Nursing Open Pub Date : 2024-11-01 DOI:10.1002/nop2.70088
Muireann McDonnell, Mary Bell, Fiona Lawler, Anita Duffy, Michael Connolly
{"title":"Multidisciplinary Inpatient Community Rehabilitation Programmes for Frail Older People: A Scoping Review.","authors":"Muireann McDonnell, Mary Bell, Fiona Lawler, Anita Duffy, Michael Connolly","doi":"10.1002/nop2.70088","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>The aim of this review was to examine the evidence on multidisciplinary inpatient community rehabilitation intervention programmes for frail older people to establish what frailty rehabilitation programmes if any have been described within the literature and to identify gaps in knowledge and outcome measures used.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A scoping review was conducted.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using the Joanna Briggs Institute approach to scoping reviews, a comprehensive literature search was conducted accessing MEDLINE via PubMed, PsychINFO (via Proquest), CINAHL Complete (via EBSCO) and the Cochrane Library and a limited search of the grey literature was undertaken.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four articles met the inclusion criteria. A heterogenous approach to geriatric rehabilitation was evident across the literature. While the reported rehabilitation interventions were aimed at frail older people, the predominant focus of frailty rehabilitation programmes were on the physical functionality of the older person with an absence or limited measurement of any psychosocial, cognitive or spiritual outcomes or aspects of quality of life.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This scoping review exposed the paucity of scientific evidence supporting the need for inpatient multidisciplinary rehabilitative programmes for frail older people wishing to remain at home.</p><p><strong>Relevance to clinical practice: </strong>Timely access to inpatient integrated frailty rehabilitation programmes can improve the quality of life and reduce the likelihood of hospital admissions for frail older people who wish to remain living in their own homes. With the current dearth of published evidence available, there is a necessity to undertake further research to understand the form, content and best models of delivery for frailty rehabilitative services for clinical, policy and practice purposes.</p><p><strong>Patient or public contribution: </strong>There was no patient or public contribution.</p>","PeriodicalId":48570,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Open","volume":"11 11","pages":"e70088"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11566915/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.70088","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: The aim of this review was to examine the evidence on multidisciplinary inpatient community rehabilitation intervention programmes for frail older people to establish what frailty rehabilitation programmes if any have been described within the literature and to identify gaps in knowledge and outcome measures used.

Design: A scoping review was conducted.

Methods: Using the Joanna Briggs Institute approach to scoping reviews, a comprehensive literature search was conducted accessing MEDLINE via PubMed, PsychINFO (via Proquest), CINAHL Complete (via EBSCO) and the Cochrane Library and a limited search of the grey literature was undertaken.

Results: Four articles met the inclusion criteria. A heterogenous approach to geriatric rehabilitation was evident across the literature. While the reported rehabilitation interventions were aimed at frail older people, the predominant focus of frailty rehabilitation programmes were on the physical functionality of the older person with an absence or limited measurement of any psychosocial, cognitive or spiritual outcomes or aspects of quality of life.

Conclusion: This scoping review exposed the paucity of scientific evidence supporting the need for inpatient multidisciplinary rehabilitative programmes for frail older people wishing to remain at home.

Relevance to clinical practice: Timely access to inpatient integrated frailty rehabilitation programmes can improve the quality of life and reduce the likelihood of hospital admissions for frail older people who wish to remain living in their own homes. With the current dearth of published evidence available, there is a necessity to undertake further research to understand the form, content and best models of delivery for frailty rehabilitative services for clinical, policy and practice purposes.

Patient or public contribution: There was no patient or public contribution.

针对体弱老年人的多学科住院社区康复计划:范围审查》。
目的:本综述旨在研究有关针对体弱老年人的多学科住院社区康复干预计划的证据,以确定文献中描述了哪些体弱康复计划(如果有的话),并找出在知识和所使用的结果测量方面存在的差距:方法:采用乔安娜-布里格斯研究所(Joanna Briggs Institute)的研究方法:方法:采用乔安娜-布里格斯研究所(Joanna Briggs Institute)的范围界定综述方法,通过PubMed对MEDLINE、PsychINFO(通过Proquest)、CINAHL Complete(通过EBSCO)和Cochrane图书馆进行了全面的文献检索,并对灰色文献进行了有限的检索:结果:四篇文章符合纳入标准。在所有文献中,老年康复的方法各不相同。虽然所报道的康复干预措施都是针对体弱老年人的,但体弱康复计划主要关注的是老年人的身体功能,而对社会心理、认知或精神方面的结果或生活质量方面则缺乏衡量或衡量有限:本次范围界定审查揭示了缺乏科学证据支持为希望留在家中的体弱老年人提供住院多学科康复计划的必要性:及时接受住院综合虚弱康复计划可以改善希望留在家中生活的虚弱老年人的生活质量,降低其入院的可能性。由于目前公开发表的证据较少,因此有必要开展进一步研究,以了解虚弱康复服务的形式、内容和最佳提供模式,从而为临床、政策和实践提供依据:患者或公众无贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nursing Open
Nursing Open Nursing-General Nursing
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
4.30%
发文量
298
审稿时长
17 weeks
期刊介绍: Nursing Open is a peer reviewed open access journal that welcomes articles on all aspects of nursing and midwifery practice, research, education and policy. We aim to publish articles that contribute to the art and science of nursing and which have a positive impact on health either locally, nationally, regionally or globally
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信