Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized clinical trial of unilateral thyroid lobectomy with or without postoperative levothyroxine treatment.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Marcin Barczyński, Filip Gołkowski, Alicja Hubalewska-Dydejczyk, Aleksander Konturek
{"title":"Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized clinical trial of unilateral thyroid lobectomy with or without postoperative levothyroxine treatment.","authors":"Marcin Barczyński, Filip Gołkowski, Alicja Hubalewska-Dydejczyk, Aleksander Konturek","doi":"10.1002/wjs.12403","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The aim of this study was to validate in 20-year follow-up (FU) the outcomes reported in World J Surg 2010; 34(6):1232-8 on recurrent nodular goiter in the contralateral thyroid lobe among patients after thyroid lobectomy (TL) for multinodular goiter (MNG) receiving versus not receiving postoperative prophylactic levothyroxine (LT4) treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Some 150 consenting patients underwent TL for MNG in 2000-2003. They were randomized to two groups, 75 patients each: (a) receiving prophylactic LT4 treatment postoperatively (dose range 75-125 microg/day to maintain thyroid-stimulating hormone values within 0.27-1.0 mU/L), and (b) not receiving LT4. Sixty-month FU was extended to 240 months for all the consenting patients. The primary outcome was prevalence of recurrent goiter. The secondary outcome was re-intervention rate for recurrent goiter. The outcomes were stratified according to individual iodine metabolism status assessed by urinary iodine excretion.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During the 5-year FU (5 patients were lost) recurrent goiter was found in patients receiving versus not receiving LT4 in 1.4% versus 16.7% (p = 0.001) whereas during 20-year FU (29 patients were lost) it was 3.3% versus 30.0% of patients, respectively (p = 0.031). During 20-year FU 4.9% versus 30.0%, respectively, of patients receiving versus not receiving LT4 required contralateral thyroid lobe treatment/surgery (p = 0.028). LT4 decreased recurrence rate among iodine-deficient patients (10.0% vs. 70.0%, respectively; p = 0.037) but not among iodine-sufficient patients (0.0% vs. 10.0%, respectively; p = 0.056).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Twenty-year FU data confirmed that prophylactic LT4 treatment significantly decreased the recurrence of nodular goiter and the need for completion intervention/surgery, mostly among patients with iodine deficiency.</p>","PeriodicalId":23926,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/wjs.12403","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study was to validate in 20-year follow-up (FU) the outcomes reported in World J Surg 2010; 34(6):1232-8 on recurrent nodular goiter in the contralateral thyroid lobe among patients after thyroid lobectomy (TL) for multinodular goiter (MNG) receiving versus not receiving postoperative prophylactic levothyroxine (LT4) treatment.

Methods: Some 150 consenting patients underwent TL for MNG in 2000-2003. They were randomized to two groups, 75 patients each: (a) receiving prophylactic LT4 treatment postoperatively (dose range 75-125 microg/day to maintain thyroid-stimulating hormone values within 0.27-1.0 mU/L), and (b) not receiving LT4. Sixty-month FU was extended to 240 months for all the consenting patients. The primary outcome was prevalence of recurrent goiter. The secondary outcome was re-intervention rate for recurrent goiter. The outcomes were stratified according to individual iodine metabolism status assessed by urinary iodine excretion.

Results: During the 5-year FU (5 patients were lost) recurrent goiter was found in patients receiving versus not receiving LT4 in 1.4% versus 16.7% (p = 0.001) whereas during 20-year FU (29 patients were lost) it was 3.3% versus 30.0% of patients, respectively (p = 0.031). During 20-year FU 4.9% versus 30.0%, respectively, of patients receiving versus not receiving LT4 required contralateral thyroid lobe treatment/surgery (p = 0.028). LT4 decreased recurrence rate among iodine-deficient patients (10.0% vs. 70.0%, respectively; p = 0.037) but not among iodine-sufficient patients (0.0% vs. 10.0%, respectively; p = 0.056).

Conclusions: Twenty-year FU data confirmed that prophylactic LT4 treatment significantly decreased the recurrence of nodular goiter and the need for completion intervention/surgery, mostly among patients with iodine deficiency.

单侧甲状腺叶切除术术后加或不加左甲状腺素治疗的随机临床试验的二十年随访。
背景:本研究旨在对《世界外科杂志》(World J Surg 2010; 34(6):1232-8)中报道的因多结节性甲状腺肿(MNG)行甲状腺叶切除术(TL)后接受与不接受术后预防性左甲状腺素(LT4)治疗的患者对侧甲状腺叶复发结节性甲状腺肿的20年随访(FU)结果进行验证:2000-2003年,约150名同意的多结节性甲状腺肿患者接受了TL治疗。他们被随机分为两组,每组 75 人:(a) 术后接受预防性左旋甲状腺素治疗(剂量范围为 75-125 微克/天,以维持促甲状腺激素值在 0.27-1.0 mU/L 范围内);(b) 不接受左旋甲状腺素治疗。所有同意接受治疗的患者的60个月FU均延长至240个月。主要结果是甲状腺肿复发率。次要结果是复发性甲状腺肿的再干预率。根据尿碘排泄量评估的个人碘代谢状况对结果进行分层:在5年的治疗过程中(5名患者死亡),接受LT4治疗与未接受LT4治疗的患者中,发现复发性甲状腺肿的比例分别为1.4%与16.7%(P = 0.001),而在20年的治疗过程中(29名患者死亡),发现复发性甲状腺肿的比例分别为3.3%与30.0%(P = 0.031)。在20年的FU期间,分别有4.9%和30.0%的接受和未接受LT4治疗的患者需要进行对侧甲状腺叶治疗/手术(P = 0.028)。LT4降低了缺碘患者的复发率(分别为10.0% vs. 70.0%;p = 0.037),但没有降低缺碘患者的复发率(分别为0.0% vs. 10.0%;p = 0.056):20年的FU数据证实,预防性LT4治疗显著降低了结节性甲状腺肿的复发率和完成干预/手术的需求,其中大部分是缺碘患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
World Journal of Surgery
World Journal of Surgery 医学-外科
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
3.80%
发文量
460
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: World Journal of Surgery is the official publication of the International Society of Surgery/Societe Internationale de Chirurgie (iss-sic.com). Under the editorship of Dr. Julie Ann Sosa, World Journal of Surgery provides an in-depth, international forum for the most authoritative information on major clinical problems in the fields of clinical and experimental surgery, surgical education, and socioeconomic aspects of surgical care. Contributions are reviewed and selected by a group of distinguished surgeons from across the world who make up the Editorial Board.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信