Effective military mental health considerations in Navy basic training.

IF 1.1 4区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Michael Brennan, Maria Spencer, Vahe Sarkissian, Chad McKenzie, Michael Domery
{"title":"Effective military mental health considerations in Navy basic training.","authors":"Michael Brennan, Maria Spencer, Vahe Sarkissian, Chad McKenzie, Michael Domery","doi":"10.1080/08995605.2024.2425466","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The U.S. military has been met with challenges in manning to meet mission requirements over the past several years. As the number of waivers approved has progressively increased over the last decade, the question of long-term service and performance has emerged. A longitudinal analysis was performed to assess time-in-service outcomes from individuals who received a waiver for a mental health condition while in Basic Military Training (BMT). Population data were retrieved from the Authoritative Data Environment (ADE) and aggregated using Tableau Software. A comparative classification analysis was conducted to determine, within the population of individuals who received waivers for mental health while at Recruit Training Command between 2014 and 2022, those still in active duty who have completed their initial service obligation, and those who separated early from the Navy. Results indicate nearly 93% of 1,356 approved waivers are still actively serving or have completed their initial service contract. While current data show a majority of individuals with approved waivers are still actively serving, the process must continue to be comprehensive in accordance with relevant Department of Defense Instructions. The importance of this research is crucial to the entire military, not just the Navy. It is recommended that each military branch complete a similar longitudinal study that evaluates the continued service engagement of recruits recommended for a waiver and, furthermore, devise a way to track performance, utilization of medical and mental health care, career advancement, and success in a specified branch to determine if guidelines should be adjusted.</p>","PeriodicalId":18696,"journal":{"name":"Military Psychology","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Military Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08995605.2024.2425466","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The U.S. military has been met with challenges in manning to meet mission requirements over the past several years. As the number of waivers approved has progressively increased over the last decade, the question of long-term service and performance has emerged. A longitudinal analysis was performed to assess time-in-service outcomes from individuals who received a waiver for a mental health condition while in Basic Military Training (BMT). Population data were retrieved from the Authoritative Data Environment (ADE) and aggregated using Tableau Software. A comparative classification analysis was conducted to determine, within the population of individuals who received waivers for mental health while at Recruit Training Command between 2014 and 2022, those still in active duty who have completed their initial service obligation, and those who separated early from the Navy. Results indicate nearly 93% of 1,356 approved waivers are still actively serving or have completed their initial service contract. While current data show a majority of individuals with approved waivers are still actively serving, the process must continue to be comprehensive in accordance with relevant Department of Defense Instructions. The importance of this research is crucial to the entire military, not just the Navy. It is recommended that each military branch complete a similar longitudinal study that evaluates the continued service engagement of recruits recommended for a waiver and, furthermore, devise a way to track performance, utilization of medical and mental health care, career advancement, and success in a specified branch to determine if guidelines should be adjusted.

海军基础训练中有效的军事心理健康考虑。
过去几年来,美军在满足任务要求的人员配备方面一直面临挑战。在过去的十年中,随着批准豁免的数量逐渐增加,长期服役和表现的问题也随之出现。我们进行了一项纵向分析,以评估在基础军事训练(BMT)期间因精神健康状况而获得豁免的人员的服役时间结果。研究人员从权威数据环境 (ADE) 中检索了人口数据,并使用 Tableau 软件对其进行了汇总。我们进行了比较分类分析,以确定 2014 年至 2022 年期间在新兵训练指挥部接受心理健康豁免的人群中,哪些人仍在服现役并已完成初始服役义务,哪些人已提前退出海军。结果表明,在 1356 名获得豁免的人员中,近 93% 仍在服役或已完成初始服役合同。虽然目前的数据显示大多数获得批准豁免的人员仍在积极服役,但必须继续按照国防部的相关指示全面开展这项工作。这项研究的重要性对整个军队都至关重要,而不仅仅是海军。建议各军种完成类似的纵向研究,评估被推荐豁免的新兵继续服役的情况,并进一步设计一种方法来跟踪新兵的表现、医疗和心理健康护理的使用情况、职业晋升情况以及在特定军种的成功情况,以确定是否应调整指导方针。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Military Psychology
Military Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
18.20%
发文量
80
期刊介绍: Military Psychology is the quarterly journal of Division 19 (Society for Military Psychology) of the American Psychological Association. The journal seeks to facilitate the scientific development of military psychology by encouraging communication between researchers and practitioners. The domain of military psychology is the conduct of research or practice of psychological principles within a military environment. The journal publishes behavioral science research articles having military applications in the areas of clinical and health psychology, training and human factors, manpower and personnel, social and organizational systems, and testing and measurement.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信