Clinical factors to predict changes of esophagogastric varices after sustained viral response with direct-acting antiviral therapy.

IF 6.9 2区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Takao Watanabe, Yoshio Tokumoto, Hironori Ochi, Toshie Mashiba, Fujimasa Tada, Atsushi Hiraoka, Yoshiyasu Kisaka, Yoshinori Tanaka, Sen Yagi, Seiji Nakanishi, Kotaro Sunago, Kazuhiko Yamauchi, Makoto Higashino, Kana Hirooka, Masaaki Tange, Atsushi Yukimoto, Makoto Morita, Yuki Okazaki, Masashi Hirooka, Masanori Abe, Yoichi Hiasa
{"title":"Clinical factors to predict changes of esophagogastric varices after sustained viral response with direct-acting antiviral therapy.","authors":"Takao Watanabe, Yoshio Tokumoto, Hironori Ochi, Toshie Mashiba, Fujimasa Tada, Atsushi Hiraoka, Yoshiyasu Kisaka, Yoshinori Tanaka, Sen Yagi, Seiji Nakanishi, Kotaro Sunago, Kazuhiko Yamauchi, Makoto Higashino, Kana Hirooka, Masaaki Tange, Atsushi Yukimoto, Makoto Morita, Yuki Okazaki, Masashi Hirooka, Masanori Abe, Yoichi Hiasa","doi":"10.1007/s00535-024-02174-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The clinical course of esophagogastric varices (EGV) after sustained virological response (SVR) with direct-acting antiviral (DAA) therapy has not been clearly elucidated. The predictors for the worsening/improvement of EGV after SVR with DAA therapy were investigated.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Of the cirrhosis patients who achieved SVR with DAA therapy, 328 patients who underwent endoscopic examinations both before and after DAA therapy were enrolled. The predictors of EGV worsening or improvement were investigated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Multivariate analysis identified a history of ascites retention, albumin at baseline, and MELD score at baseline as independent factors that contributed to EGV exacerbation. On multivariate analysis, two factors, BMI and platelet count, were related to EGV improvement. An integrated scoring system was created using these risk factors with or without weighting according to each hazard ratio, and the patients were divided into three groups. A scoring system with weighting of each factor appeared to be more useful, with fewer intermediate patients and more cases classified into the low-risk and high-risk groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Esophagogastric varices after SVR have a varied clinical course. Using this scoring system that can accurately predict EGV outcomes in clinical settings, it may be feasible to establish a risk-based EGV surveillance plan following SVR.</p>","PeriodicalId":16059,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Gastroenterology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00535-024-02174-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The clinical course of esophagogastric varices (EGV) after sustained virological response (SVR) with direct-acting antiviral (DAA) therapy has not been clearly elucidated. The predictors for the worsening/improvement of EGV after SVR with DAA therapy were investigated.

Methods: Of the cirrhosis patients who achieved SVR with DAA therapy, 328 patients who underwent endoscopic examinations both before and after DAA therapy were enrolled. The predictors of EGV worsening or improvement were investigated.

Results: Multivariate analysis identified a history of ascites retention, albumin at baseline, and MELD score at baseline as independent factors that contributed to EGV exacerbation. On multivariate analysis, two factors, BMI and platelet count, were related to EGV improvement. An integrated scoring system was created using these risk factors with or without weighting according to each hazard ratio, and the patients were divided into three groups. A scoring system with weighting of each factor appeared to be more useful, with fewer intermediate patients and more cases classified into the low-risk and high-risk groups.

Conclusion: Esophagogastric varices after SVR have a varied clinical course. Using this scoring system that can accurately predict EGV outcomes in clinical settings, it may be feasible to establish a risk-based EGV surveillance plan following SVR.

预测直接作用抗病毒疗法持续病毒应答后食管胃静脉曲张变化的临床因素。
背景:直接作用抗病毒药物(DAA)治疗持续病毒学应答(SVR)后食管胃静脉曲张(EGV)的临床过程尚未明确阐明。本研究调查了直接作用抗病毒药物治疗 SVR 后 EGV 恶化/改善的预测因素:在接受 DAA 治疗获得 SVR 的肝硬化患者中,有 328 名患者在接受 DAA 治疗前后均接受了内镜检查。结果:多变量分析确定了肝硬化患者的内镜检查病史:多变量分析发现,腹水潴留史、基线白蛋白和基线 MELD 评分是导致 EGV 恶化的独立因素。通过多变量分析,BMI 和血小板计数这两个因素与 EGV 改善有关。利用这些风险因素创建了一个综合评分系统,根据每个危险比加权或不加权,并将患者分为三组。对每个因素进行加权的评分系统似乎更有用,中间型患者更少,更多病例被分为低风险组和高风险组:结论:SVR 后食管胃底静脉曲张的临床过程多种多样。该评分系统可在临床环境中准确预测食管胃底静脉曲张的预后,因此在 SVR 后建立基于风险的食管胃底静脉曲张监测计划是可行的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Gastroenterology
Journal of Gastroenterology 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
12.20
自引率
1.60%
发文量
99
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Gastroenterology, which is the official publication of the Japanese Society of Gastroenterology, publishes Original Articles (Alimentary Tract/Liver, Pancreas, and Biliary Tract), Review Articles, Letters to the Editors and other articles on all aspects of the field of gastroenterology. Significant contributions relating to basic research, theory, and practice are welcomed. These publications are designed to disseminate knowledge in this field to a worldwide audience, and accordingly, its editorial board has an international membership.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信