Individualized positive end-expiratory pressure in laparoscopic surgery: a randomized controlled trial.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Muqiao Cheng, Fengying Xu, Wei Wang, Weiwei Li, Ran Xia, Haiying Ji, Shunan Lv, Xueyin Shi, Chengmi Zhang
{"title":"Individualized positive end-expiratory pressure in laparoscopic surgery: a randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Muqiao Cheng, Fengying Xu, Wei Wang, Weiwei Li, Ran Xia, Haiying Ji, Shunan Lv, Xueyin Shi, Chengmi Zhang","doi":"10.23736/S0375-9393.24.18209-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The reduction in functional residual capacity (FRC) is a significant pathological factor in the development of postoperative pulmonary complications. Appropriate positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) is critical to preserve FRC during mechanical ventilation. Our previous study suggests that using driving pressure-guided PEEP can reduce postoperative pulmonary complications. In this study, we hypothesize that individualized PEEP can increase immediate postoperative FRC and improve lung ventilation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-centered, randomized controlled trial included a total of 91 patients scheduled for laparoscopic surgery for colorectal carcinoma. Patients were randomly assigned to receive individualized PEEP guided by minimum driving pressure or a fixed PEEP of six cmH<inf>2</inf>O. The primary outcome was postoperative FRC. Secondary outcomes included the incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications, postoperative Oxygenation Index, alveolar-arterial oxygen tension difference (P<inf>A-a</inf>O<inf>2</inf>), intrapulmonary shunt (Q<inf>S</inf>/Q<inf>T</inf>), and Respiratory Index, as well as lung ventilation measured by electrical impedance tomography.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median value of PEEP in the individualized group was 14 cmH<inf>2</inf>O, with an interquartile range of 12-14 cmH<inf>2</inf>O. The postoperative FRC was significantly higher in the individualized PEEP group than that in the PEEP six cmH<inf>2</inf>O group (32.8 [12.8] vs. 25.0 [12.6] mL/kg, P=0.004). Patients receiving driving pressure-guided PEEP also had significantly higher Oxygenation Index, better ventilation distribution, and lower PA-aO<inf>2</inf>, Q<inf>S</inf>/Q<inf>T</inf>, and Respiratory Index.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Driving pressure-guided PEEP can preserve postoperative FRC and provide better ventilation and oxygenation for patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":18522,"journal":{"name":"Minerva anestesiologica","volume":"90 11","pages":"969-978"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minerva anestesiologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0375-9393.24.18209-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The reduction in functional residual capacity (FRC) is a significant pathological factor in the development of postoperative pulmonary complications. Appropriate positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) is critical to preserve FRC during mechanical ventilation. Our previous study suggests that using driving pressure-guided PEEP can reduce postoperative pulmonary complications. In this study, we hypothesize that individualized PEEP can increase immediate postoperative FRC and improve lung ventilation.

Methods: This single-centered, randomized controlled trial included a total of 91 patients scheduled for laparoscopic surgery for colorectal carcinoma. Patients were randomly assigned to receive individualized PEEP guided by minimum driving pressure or a fixed PEEP of six cmH2O. The primary outcome was postoperative FRC. Secondary outcomes included the incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications, postoperative Oxygenation Index, alveolar-arterial oxygen tension difference (PA-aO2), intrapulmonary shunt (QS/QT), and Respiratory Index, as well as lung ventilation measured by electrical impedance tomography.

Results: The median value of PEEP in the individualized group was 14 cmH2O, with an interquartile range of 12-14 cmH2O. The postoperative FRC was significantly higher in the individualized PEEP group than that in the PEEP six cmH2O group (32.8 [12.8] vs. 25.0 [12.6] mL/kg, P=0.004). Patients receiving driving pressure-guided PEEP also had significantly higher Oxygenation Index, better ventilation distribution, and lower PA-aO2, QS/QT, and Respiratory Index.

Conclusions: Driving pressure-guided PEEP can preserve postoperative FRC and provide better ventilation and oxygenation for patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal surgery.

腹腔镜手术中的个性化呼气末正压:随机对照试验。
背景:功能残余容量(FRC)的降低是导致术后肺部并发症的一个重要病理因素。在机械通气过程中,适当的呼气末正压(PEEP)对保持功能残余量至关重要。我们之前的研究表明,使用驱动压力引导的 PEEP 可以减少术后肺部并发症。在本研究中,我们假设个体化 PEEP 可以提高术后即刻 FRC 并改善肺通气:这项单中心随机对照试验共纳入 91 名计划接受腹腔镜结直肠癌手术的患者。患者被随机分配接受以最小驱动压力为指导的个性化 PEEP 或 6 cmH2O 的固定 PEEP。主要结果是术后 FRC。次要结果包括术后肺部并发症的发生率、术后氧合指数、肺泡-动脉血氧张力差(PA-aO2)、肺内分流(QS/QT)和呼吸指数,以及电阻抗断层扫描测量的肺通气量:个体化组的 PEEP 中位值为 14 cmH2O,四分位间范围为 12-14 cmH2O。个体化 PEEP 组的术后 FRC 明显高于 PEEP 6 cmH2O 组(32.8 [12.8] 对 25.0 [12.6] mL/kg,P=0.004)。接受驱动压力引导 PEEP 的患者的氧合指数也明显更高,通气分布更好,PA-aO2、QS/QT 和呼吸指数更低:结论:驱动压力引导下的 PEEP 可保持术后 FRC,并为腹腔镜结直肠手术患者提供更好的通气和氧合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Minerva anestesiologica
Minerva anestesiologica 医学-麻醉学
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
21.90%
发文量
367
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Minerva Anestesiologica is the journal of the Italian National Society of Anaesthesia, Analgesia, Resuscitation, and Intensive Care. Minerva Anestesiologica publishes scientific papers on Anesthesiology, Intensive care, Analgesia, Perioperative Medicine and related fields. Manuscripts are expected to comply with the instructions to authors which conform to the Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Editors by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信