Role of the endonasal endoscopic approach in intraorbital tumor surgery: insights from a single-center experience.

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Daisuke Kuga, Daisuke Murakami, Yuhei Sangatsuda, Tomoharu Suzuki, Yusuke Miyamoto, Noritaka Komune, Koji Yoshimoto
{"title":"Role of the endonasal endoscopic approach in intraorbital tumor surgery: insights from a single-center experience.","authors":"Daisuke Kuga, Daisuke Murakami, Yuhei Sangatsuda, Tomoharu Suzuki, Yusuke Miyamoto, Noritaka Komune, Koji Yoshimoto","doi":"10.3171/2024.6.JNS24327","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of the endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) in the surgical management of intraorbital tumors and analyze the adjunctive role of the transorbital approach (TOA) and extended modified medial maxillectomy (EMMM) in addressing anatomically complex tumors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study retrospectively reviewed 13 cases of primary intraorbital tumors managed with EEA, integrating TOA and EMMM, based on specific tumor location and extent. A detailed analysis was conducted on the surgical techniques used, tumor size and location in relation to critical structures such as the optic nerve, and overall surgical outcomes, with a focus on the extent of resection and postoperative visual function.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 13 cases analyzed (4 cavernous hemangiomas, 3 schwannomas, mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, liposarcoma, inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor, osteoma, and myxoid spindle tumor), the EEA served as the primary surgical method, especially for the 8 intraconal tumors situated medially to the optic nerve, with 1 tumor situated inferiorly to the optic nerve. Extraconal tumors, present in 5 cases, necessitated additional approaches: TOA was utilized for tumors with anterior extension, and EMMM was applied to those extending toward the inferior orbital wall. Gross-total resection was accomplished in 80% of the operative cases, with an overall improvement in visual function observed in 69.2% of the patients postsurgery. Complications were infrequent, with enophthalmos requiring subsequent reconstruction and a permanent slight visual field defect in the upper outer quadrant, occurring in 1 case each, underscoring the safety and efficacy of integrated surgical approaches.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The combination of EEA with TOA and EMMM provides a comprehensive and adaptable surgical strategy for intraorbital tumors, accommodating various lesion locations and complexities. This combined approach not only facilitates extensive tumor resection but also maximizes the preservation of ocular function and cosmetic outcomes. The favorable results of this study support the use of a multidisciplinary surgical approach and highlight the potential for improved patient outcomes with the continued development of endoscopic techniques. Further research with a larger cohort is essential to validate these findings and establish guidelines for the combined use of these surgical methods.</p>","PeriodicalId":16505,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgery","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3171/2024.6.JNS24327","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of the endoscopic endonasal approach (EEA) in the surgical management of intraorbital tumors and analyze the adjunctive role of the transorbital approach (TOA) and extended modified medial maxillectomy (EMMM) in addressing anatomically complex tumors.

Methods: This study retrospectively reviewed 13 cases of primary intraorbital tumors managed with EEA, integrating TOA and EMMM, based on specific tumor location and extent. A detailed analysis was conducted on the surgical techniques used, tumor size and location in relation to critical structures such as the optic nerve, and overall surgical outcomes, with a focus on the extent of resection and postoperative visual function.

Results: Of the 13 cases analyzed (4 cavernous hemangiomas, 3 schwannomas, mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, liposarcoma, inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor, osteoma, and myxoid spindle tumor), the EEA served as the primary surgical method, especially for the 8 intraconal tumors situated medially to the optic nerve, with 1 tumor situated inferiorly to the optic nerve. Extraconal tumors, present in 5 cases, necessitated additional approaches: TOA was utilized for tumors with anterior extension, and EMMM was applied to those extending toward the inferior orbital wall. Gross-total resection was accomplished in 80% of the operative cases, with an overall improvement in visual function observed in 69.2% of the patients postsurgery. Complications were infrequent, with enophthalmos requiring subsequent reconstruction and a permanent slight visual field defect in the upper outer quadrant, occurring in 1 case each, underscoring the safety and efficacy of integrated surgical approaches.

Conclusions: The combination of EEA with TOA and EMMM provides a comprehensive and adaptable surgical strategy for intraorbital tumors, accommodating various lesion locations and complexities. This combined approach not only facilitates extensive tumor resection but also maximizes the preservation of ocular function and cosmetic outcomes. The favorable results of this study support the use of a multidisciplinary surgical approach and highlight the potential for improved patient outcomes with the continued development of endoscopic techniques. Further research with a larger cohort is essential to validate these findings and establish guidelines for the combined use of these surgical methods.

内窥镜方法在眶内肿瘤手术中的作用:单中心经验的启示。
研究目的本研究旨在评估内窥镜鼻内孔入路(EEA)在眶内肿瘤手术治疗中的有效性,并分析经眶入路(TOA)和扩大改良上颌骨内侧切除术(EMMM)在处理解剖结构复杂的肿瘤时的辅助作用:本研究根据肿瘤的具体位置和范围,回顾性分析了13例采用EEA、TOA和EMMM综合治疗的原发性眶内肿瘤。详细分析了所使用的手术技术、肿瘤大小和位置与视神经等重要结构的关系,以及整体手术效果,重点是切除范围和术后视功能:在分析的13个病例(4个海绵状血管瘤、3个分裂瘤、粘膜相关淋巴组织淋巴瘤、弥漫大B细胞淋巴瘤、脂肪肉瘤、炎症性肌纤维母细胞瘤、骨瘤和肌样纺锤形瘤)中,EEA是主要的手术方法,特别是对于8个位于视神经内侧的锥体内肿瘤,以及1个位于视神经下侧的肿瘤。有 5 个病例的肿瘤位于视神经外侧,因此需要采用其他方法:前方延伸的肿瘤采用TOA,向眶下壁延伸的肿瘤采用EMMM。80%的手术病例实现了大体全切除,69.2%的患者术后视功能得到改善。并发症并不常见,眼球突出需要后续重建,外上象限出现永久性轻微视野缺损的病例各1例,这凸显了综合手术方法的安全性和有效性:结论:EEA与TOA和EMMM的结合为眶内肿瘤提供了一种全面、适应性强的手术策略,可适应不同的病变位置和复杂性。这种综合方法不仅有利于肿瘤的广泛切除,还能最大限度地保护眼部功能和美容效果。这项研究的良好结果支持了多学科手术方法的使用,并强调了随着内窥镜技术的不断发展,改善患者预后的潜力。为了验证这些研究结果,并为这些手术方法的联合使用制定指导方针,有必要对更大的群体进行进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of neurosurgery
Journal of neurosurgery 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
7.30%
发文量
1003
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neurosurgery, Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics, and Neurosurgical Focus are devoted to the publication of original works relating primarily to neurosurgery, including studies in clinical neurophysiology, organic neurology, ophthalmology, radiology, pathology, and molecular biology. The Editors and Editorial Boards encourage submission of clinical and laboratory studies. Other manuscripts accepted for review include technical notes on instruments or equipment that are innovative or useful to clinicians and researchers in the field of neuroscience; papers describing unusual cases; manuscripts on historical persons or events related to neurosurgery; and in Neurosurgical Focus, occasional reviews. Letters to the Editor commenting on articles recently published in the Journal of Neurosurgery, Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, and Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信