Infection Risk Associated with High-Efficacy Disease-Modifying Agents in Multiple Sclerosis: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

IF 6.3 2区 医学 Q1 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Jieni Li, George J Hutton, Tyler J Varisco, Ying Lin, Ekere J Essien, Rajender R Aparasu
{"title":"Infection Risk Associated with High-Efficacy Disease-Modifying Agents in Multiple Sclerosis: A Retrospective Cohort Study.","authors":"Jieni Li, George J Hutton, Tyler J Varisco, Ying Lin, Ekere J Essien, Rajender R Aparasu","doi":"10.1002/cpt.3492","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In patients with multiple sclerosis (MS), infections represent a significant concern, particularly given the immunomodulatory effects of disease-modifying agents (DMAs). High-efficacy DMAs (heDMAs) play a pivotal role in delaying MS progression, yet their use also raises concerns regarding the risk of infection. This study aimed to compare the infection risk with the use of heDMA and moderate-efficacy disease-modifying agents (meDMAs) in MS patients. This retrospective cohort study involved adult (18-64 years) MS patients with incident DMA use based on the 2015-2019 MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounters Database. Patients initiating heDMAs (natalizumab, alemtuzumab, and ocrelizumab) or meDMAs (interferon beta-1a, interferon beta-1b, fingolimod, teriflunomide, dimethyl fumarate, and glatiramer acetate) were included. The outcomes of interest were comparative risk of overall infection, serious infection, and frequently reported types of infection. Adjusted hazard ratios (aHR) were estimated in inverse probability treatment weighting (IPTW) based on Cox proportional hazard models. Among 10,003 eligible incident DMA users, 22.92% of patients initiated heDMAs. The IPTW-CPH model revealed that patients with heDMAs were associated with a higher risk of serious infection (aHR: 1.24, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.06-1.44) and urinary tract infection (UTI; aHR: 1.21, 95% CI: 1.14-1.30). Sensitivity analyses with different follow-up periods yielded consistent findings with the main analyses. In MS, heDMAs were associated with a greater risk of serious infection and UTI compared with meDMAs. These findings suggest the need to carefully monitor and manage the infection risk to optimize the use of heDMAs in MS.</p>","PeriodicalId":153,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cpt.3492","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In patients with multiple sclerosis (MS), infections represent a significant concern, particularly given the immunomodulatory effects of disease-modifying agents (DMAs). High-efficacy DMAs (heDMAs) play a pivotal role in delaying MS progression, yet their use also raises concerns regarding the risk of infection. This study aimed to compare the infection risk with the use of heDMA and moderate-efficacy disease-modifying agents (meDMAs) in MS patients. This retrospective cohort study involved adult (18-64 years) MS patients with incident DMA use based on the 2015-2019 MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounters Database. Patients initiating heDMAs (natalizumab, alemtuzumab, and ocrelizumab) or meDMAs (interferon beta-1a, interferon beta-1b, fingolimod, teriflunomide, dimethyl fumarate, and glatiramer acetate) were included. The outcomes of interest were comparative risk of overall infection, serious infection, and frequently reported types of infection. Adjusted hazard ratios (aHR) were estimated in inverse probability treatment weighting (IPTW) based on Cox proportional hazard models. Among 10,003 eligible incident DMA users, 22.92% of patients initiated heDMAs. The IPTW-CPH model revealed that patients with heDMAs were associated with a higher risk of serious infection (aHR: 1.24, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.06-1.44) and urinary tract infection (UTI; aHR: 1.21, 95% CI: 1.14-1.30). Sensitivity analyses with different follow-up periods yielded consistent findings with the main analyses. In MS, heDMAs were associated with a greater risk of serious infection and UTI compared with meDMAs. These findings suggest the need to carefully monitor and manage the infection risk to optimize the use of heDMAs in MS.

多发性硬化症患者使用高效改变病情药物的感染风险:一项回顾性队列研究
对于多发性硬化症(MS)患者来说,感染是一个重大问题,尤其是考虑到疾病改变药物(DMAs)的免疫调节作用。高效DMAs(heDMAs)在延缓多发性硬化症进展方面发挥着关键作用,但其使用也引发了对感染风险的担忧。本研究旨在比较多发性硬化症患者使用heDMA和中效疾病改变药物(meDMA)的感染风险。这项回顾性队列研究涉及成年(18-64 岁)多发性硬化症患者,根据 2015-2019 年 MarketScan 商业索赔和会诊数据库,他们都曾使用过 DMA。研究纳入了开始使用 heDMAs(纳他珠单抗、阿来珠单抗和奥克雷珠单抗)或 meDMAs(β-1a 干扰素、β-1b 干扰素、芬戈莫德、特利氟胺、富马酸二甲酯和醋酸格拉替雷)的患者。关注的结果是总体感染、严重感染和经常报告的感染类型的比较风险。调整后的危险比(aHR)是根据 Cox 比例危险模型以反概率治疗加权法(IPTW)估算的。在 10,003 名符合条件的 DMA 使用者中,22.92% 的患者开始使用 heDMA。IPTW-CPH 模型显示,使用 heDMAs 的患者发生严重感染(aHR:1.24,95% 置信区间 (CI):1.06-1.44)和尿路感染(UTI;aHR:1.21,95% CI:1.14-1.30)的风险较高。不同随访期的敏感性分析结果与主要分析结果一致。在 MS 中,与 meDMA 相比,heDMA 与更高的严重感染和 UTI 风险相关。这些研究结果表明,需要仔细监测和管理感染风险,以优化 heDMAs 在 MS 中的使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.70
自引率
7.50%
发文量
290
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics (CPT) is the authoritative cross-disciplinary journal in experimental and clinical medicine devoted to publishing advances in the nature, action, efficacy, and evaluation of therapeutics. CPT welcomes original Articles in the emerging areas of translational, predictive and personalized medicine; new therapeutic modalities including gene and cell therapies; pharmacogenomics, proteomics and metabolomics; bioinformation and applied systems biology complementing areas of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, human investigation and clinical trials, pharmacovigilence, pharmacoepidemiology, pharmacometrics, and population pharmacology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信