Editorial Comment: Abolition and Performance

IF 0.8 3区 艺术学 0 THEATER
Ariel Nereson
{"title":"Editorial Comment: Abolition and Performance","authors":"Ariel Nereson","doi":"10.1353/tj.2024.a943395","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<span><span>In lieu of</span> an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:</span>\n<p> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> Editorial Comment:<span>Abolition and Performance</span> <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Ariel Nereson </li> </ul> <blockquote> <p>[A]bolition has to be the way to relate to one another. So, not a tool to implement, but a posture and a way of life.</p> —Ashon Crawley<sup>1</sup> </blockquote> <p>Theatre, dance, and performance studies offer many methodological tools for understanding practice and interpreting theories embedded in and arising from practice. Attending to time, space, embodiment, affect, energy, and lived experience is a foundational commitment of our fields. In bringing abolition and performance together as paired keywords, this special issue seeks to understand how interventions in theatre, dance, and performance studies can be tools that help us reorient our individual and collective postures toward abolition. Abolition is a set of relations, a doing, a way of life, as Ashon Crawley writes, that seeks the undoing of the forms of relation we currently live under in the racial capitalocene that presume the necessity of carcerality in order to recompense harm.<sup>2</sup> In other words, rejecting modes of social organization oriented around punishment (and hegemonic assertions of whom can be punished, and how) requires practicing the postures of \"restorative justice, abolition, hospitality, [and] joy,\" both as individual alignments and in community.<sup>3</sup></p> <p>This special issue explicitly connects theatre, dance, and performance studies with the carceral turn in the humanities and social sciences, where, as Robert Fanuzzi writes, \"abolition\" refers to a \"horizon of change\" that encompasses \"an end to traditions, or epistemologies, that normalize centuries of racial oppression and gender inequality as inevitable, if regrettable, features of modernity and which center or overrepresent Western European male concepts of humanity as their default.\"<sup>4</sup> Taking up \"carcerality\" <strong>[End Page xi]</strong> as a keyword, Beth E. Richie defines the term as \"a condition or set of social arrangements that advances a reliance on punishment or incapacitation.\"<sup>5</sup> Across disciplines, performance is a flexible analytic for understanding the circulation of power. In an address to members upon becoming president of the American Studies Association, abolitionist geographer Ruth Wilson Gilmore recounted the many intersections between her study in drama and her work in abolitionist thinking and organizing, encouraging listeners to think of public policy as a \"script\" for the future.<sup>6</sup></p> <p>As a focus of theatre, dance, and performance studies, abolition has a short but powerful bibliography. Abolition and performance intersect memorably in a foundational contribution to Black performance studies from Daphne Brooks in her chapter \"The Escape Artist: Henry Box Brown, Black Abolitionist Performance, and Moving Panoramas of Slavery.\"<sup>7</sup> The influential collection <em>Race and Performance after Repetition</em> (Duke University Press, 2020), coedited by Soyica Diggs Colbert, Douglas A. Jones, Jr., and Shane Vogel, features several essays grounded in performance studies that take up carcerality as their primary focus.<sup>8</sup> More recently, Robin Bernstein has documented how William Freeman refused to perform according to the script of Auburn State Prison in the 1840s and how understanding the motivations and consequences of his refusal rewrites the history of incarceration in the United States.<sup>9</sup> Performance-adjacent works such as Nicole R. Fleetwood's <em>Marking Time: Art in the Age of Mass Incarceration</em> and its theorization of carceral aesthetics have proven influential across several disciplines; performance has likewise become central to understanding carcerality, as in Sam C. Tenorio's <em>jump: Black Anarchism and Antiblack Carcerality</em>, which reads the motion of jumping as a repertoire of Black political refusal.<sup>10</sup> From staged performances that activate spectacle in order to stir their audiences<sup>11</sup> to studies like Jessi Lee Jackson's, wherein police culture is defined as \"every performance of identification with the existing <strong>[End Page xii]</strong> social and economic order and the violence used to maintain it,\" \"performance\" is both a salient site and a flexible analytic for understanding the embodied practices of the carceral state and of abolition's past, present, and future alternatives.<sup>12</sup></p> <p>This special issue opens with a subject who has a long association with abolition: the mythic and historic John Brown. Ben Spatz, SAJ, Eero Laine, Michelle Liu Carriger, and Henry Bial invite readers into a multifaceted exploration of Brown's many iterations as they flicker through racial formations across media from murals to mascots and taglines to television. Through the authors' collective focus on \"the unbearable...</p> </p>","PeriodicalId":46247,"journal":{"name":"THEATRE JOURNAL","volume":"160 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"THEATRE JOURNAL","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/tj.2024.a943395","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"THEATER","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

  • Editorial Comment:Abolition and Performance
  • Ariel Nereson

[A]bolition has to be the way to relate to one another. So, not a tool to implement, but a posture and a way of life.

—Ashon Crawley1

Theatre, dance, and performance studies offer many methodological tools for understanding practice and interpreting theories embedded in and arising from practice. Attending to time, space, embodiment, affect, energy, and lived experience is a foundational commitment of our fields. In bringing abolition and performance together as paired keywords, this special issue seeks to understand how interventions in theatre, dance, and performance studies can be tools that help us reorient our individual and collective postures toward abolition. Abolition is a set of relations, a doing, a way of life, as Ashon Crawley writes, that seeks the undoing of the forms of relation we currently live under in the racial capitalocene that presume the necessity of carcerality in order to recompense harm.2 In other words, rejecting modes of social organization oriented around punishment (and hegemonic assertions of whom can be punished, and how) requires practicing the postures of "restorative justice, abolition, hospitality, [and] joy," both as individual alignments and in community.3

This special issue explicitly connects theatre, dance, and performance studies with the carceral turn in the humanities and social sciences, where, as Robert Fanuzzi writes, "abolition" refers to a "horizon of change" that encompasses "an end to traditions, or epistemologies, that normalize centuries of racial oppression and gender inequality as inevitable, if regrettable, features of modernity and which center or overrepresent Western European male concepts of humanity as their default."4 Taking up "carcerality" [End Page xi] as a keyword, Beth E. Richie defines the term as "a condition or set of social arrangements that advances a reliance on punishment or incapacitation."5 Across disciplines, performance is a flexible analytic for understanding the circulation of power. In an address to members upon becoming president of the American Studies Association, abolitionist geographer Ruth Wilson Gilmore recounted the many intersections between her study in drama and her work in abolitionist thinking and organizing, encouraging listeners to think of public policy as a "script" for the future.6

As a focus of theatre, dance, and performance studies, abolition has a short but powerful bibliography. Abolition and performance intersect memorably in a foundational contribution to Black performance studies from Daphne Brooks in her chapter "The Escape Artist: Henry Box Brown, Black Abolitionist Performance, and Moving Panoramas of Slavery."7 The influential collection Race and Performance after Repetition (Duke University Press, 2020), coedited by Soyica Diggs Colbert, Douglas A. Jones, Jr., and Shane Vogel, features several essays grounded in performance studies that take up carcerality as their primary focus.8 More recently, Robin Bernstein has documented how William Freeman refused to perform according to the script of Auburn State Prison in the 1840s and how understanding the motivations and consequences of his refusal rewrites the history of incarceration in the United States.9 Performance-adjacent works such as Nicole R. Fleetwood's Marking Time: Art in the Age of Mass Incarceration and its theorization of carceral aesthetics have proven influential across several disciplines; performance has likewise become central to understanding carcerality, as in Sam C. Tenorio's jump: Black Anarchism and Antiblack Carcerality, which reads the motion of jumping as a repertoire of Black political refusal.10 From staged performances that activate spectacle in order to stir their audiences11 to studies like Jessi Lee Jackson's, wherein police culture is defined as "every performance of identification with the existing [End Page xii] social and economic order and the violence used to maintain it," "performance" is both a salient site and a flexible analytic for understanding the embodied practices of the carceral state and of abolition's past, present, and future alternatives.12

This special issue opens with a subject who has a long association with abolition: the mythic and historic John Brown. Ben Spatz, SAJ, Eero Laine, Michelle Liu Carriger, and Henry Bial invite readers into a multifaceted exploration of Brown's many iterations as they flicker through racial formations across media from murals to mascots and taglines to television. Through the authors' collective focus on "the unbearable...

社论评论:废除与绩效
以下是内容的简要摘录,以代替摘要: 编辑评论:废除与表现 Ariel Nereson []"废除 "必须是人与人之间相处的方式。因此,这不是一种实施工具,而是一种姿态和生活方式。阿尚-克劳利1 戏剧、舞蹈和表演研究提供了许多方法论工具,用于理解实践和解释实践中蕴含和产生的理论。关注时间、空间、体现、情感、能量和生活经验是我们这些领域的基本承诺。本特刊将废除死刑和表演这两个关键词结合在一起,旨在了解戏剧、舞蹈和表演研究中的干预措施如何成为帮助我们调整个人和集体对废除死刑的态度的工具。正如阿什恩-克劳利(Ashon Crawley)所写的那样,废除是一种关系、一种行为、一种生活方式,它旨在消除我们目前生活在种族资本时代的关系形式,这种关系形式假定必须以诚实来补偿伤害。2 换言之,要摒弃以惩罚为导向的社会组织模式(以及关于谁可以受到惩罚、如何受到惩罚的霸权主张),就必须在个人和社区中践行 "恢复性正义、废除、好客、[和]欢乐 "的姿态。本特刊明确地将戏剧、舞蹈和表演研究与人文和社会科学中的 "监禁转向 "联系在一起,正如罗伯特-范努兹(Robert Fanuzzi)所写,"废除 "指的是一种 "变革的视野",包括 "结束传统或认识论,这些传统或认识论将数百年的种族压迫和性别不平等视为现代性不可避免的特征(尽管令人遗憾),并将西欧男性的人性概念作为其默认的中心或过度代表。"4 以 "carcerality"[尾页 xi]为关键词,贝丝-E-里奇(Beth E. Richie)将其定义为 "一种依赖于惩罚或丧失能力的条件或一系列社会安排"。废奴主义地理学家露丝-威尔逊-吉尔摩(Ruth Wilson Gilmore)在就任美国研究协会主席后向会员发表讲话,讲述了她的戏剧研究与废奴主义思想和组织工作之间的诸多交集,鼓励听众将公共政策视为未来的 "剧本"。达芙妮-布鲁克斯(Daphne Brooks)在她的 "逃亡艺术家 "一章中为黑人表演研究做出了奠基性贡献,废奴与表演的交集令人难忘:7 由索伊卡-迪格斯-科尔伯特(Soyica Diggs Colbert)、小道格拉斯-A-琼斯(Douglas A. Jones)和肖恩-沃格尔(Shane Vogel)共同编辑的《重复之后的种族与表演》(杜克大学出版社,2020 年)这本颇具影响力的文集,收录了多篇以表演研究为基础的论文,并将 "carcerality "作为其主要关注点。最近,罗宾-伯恩斯坦记录了威廉-弗里曼在 19 世纪 40 年代如何拒绝按照奥本州立监狱的剧本进行表演,以及了解他拒绝表演的动机和后果如何改写了美国的监禁史。尼科尔-R-弗利特伍德(Nicole R. Fleetwood)的《标记时间:大规模监禁时代的艺术》(Marking Time: Art in the Age of Mass Incarceration)等与表演相关的作品及其对监禁美学的理论化已被证明对多个学科具有影响力;表演同样成为理解监禁的核心,如萨姆-C-特诺里奥(Sam C. Tenorio)的《跳跃》(Jump:特诺里奥的《跳跃:黑人无政府主义与反黑人的 "胴体性"》,将跳跃动作解读为黑人政治拒绝的剧目。杰西-李-杰克逊(Jessi Lee Jackson)的研究将警察文化定义为 "认同现存 [尾页 xii]社会和经济秩序以及用来维持这种秩序的暴力的每一种表现","表演 "既是理解监禁国家的体现性实践以及废奴的过去、现在和未来替代方案的显著场所,也是灵活的分析方法。Ben Spatz、SAJ、Eero Laine、Michelle Liu Carriger 和 Henry Bial 邀请读者对布朗的多种形象进行多层面的探索,从壁画到吉祥物,从标语到电视,布朗的形象在各种媒体的种族形态中闪烁不定。通过作者们对 "难以忍受的...
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
THEATRE JOURNAL
THEATRE JOURNAL THEATER-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
40.00%
发文量
87
期刊介绍: For over five decades, Theatre Journal"s broad array of scholarly articles and reviews has earned it an international reputation as one of the most authoritative and useful publications of theatre studies available today. Drawing contributions from noted practitioners and scholars, Theatre Journal features social and historical studies, production reviews, and theoretical inquiries that analyze dramatic texts and production.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信