Prediction of crippling load of I-shaped steel columns by using soft computing techniques

Rashid Mustafa
{"title":"Prediction of crippling load of I-shaped steel columns by using soft computing techniques","authors":"Rashid Mustafa","doi":"10.1007/s43503-024-00038-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study is primarily aimed at creating three machine learning models: artificial neural network (ANN), random forest (RF), and k-nearest neighbour (KNN), so as to predict the crippling load (CL) of I-shaped steel columns. Five input parameters, namely length of column (<i>L</i>), width of flange (<i>b</i><sub>f</sub>), flange thickness (<i>t</i><sub>f</sub>), web thickness (<i>t</i><sub>w</sub>) and height of column (<i>H</i>), are used to compute the crippling load (CL). A range of performance indicators, including the coefficient of determination (<i>R</i><sup>2</sup>), variance account factor (VAF), a-10 index, root mean square error (RMSE), mean absolute error (MAE) and mean absolute deviation (MAD), are used to assess the effectiveness of the established machine learning models. The results show that all of the three ML (machine learning) models can accurately predict the crippling load, but the performance of ANN is superior: it delivers the highest value of <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.998 and the lowest value of RMSE = 0.008 in the training phase, as well as the highest value of <i>R</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.996 and the smaller value of RMSE = 0.012 in the testing phase. Additional methods, including rank analysis, reliability analysis, regression plot, Taylor diagram and error matrix plot, are employed to assess the models’ performance. The reliability index (<i>β</i>) of the models is calculated by using the first-order second moment (FOSM) technique, and the result is compared with the actual value. Additionally, sensitivity analysis is performed to check the impact of the input variables on the output (CL), finding that <i>b</i><sub>f</sub> has the greatest impact on the crippling load, followed by <i>t</i><sub>f</sub>, <i>t</i><sub>w</sub>, <i>H</i> and <i>L</i>, in that order. This study demonstrates that ML techniques are useful for developing a reliable numerical tool for measuring the crippling load of I-shaped steel columns. It is found that the proposed techniques can also be used to predict other kinds of failures as well as different kinds of perforated columns.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72138,"journal":{"name":"AI in civil engineering","volume":"3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s43503-024-00038-2.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AI in civil engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s43503-024-00038-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study is primarily aimed at creating three machine learning models: artificial neural network (ANN), random forest (RF), and k-nearest neighbour (KNN), so as to predict the crippling load (CL) of I-shaped steel columns. Five input parameters, namely length of column (L), width of flange (bf), flange thickness (tf), web thickness (tw) and height of column (H), are used to compute the crippling load (CL). A range of performance indicators, including the coefficient of determination (R2), variance account factor (VAF), a-10 index, root mean square error (RMSE), mean absolute error (MAE) and mean absolute deviation (MAD), are used to assess the effectiveness of the established machine learning models. The results show that all of the three ML (machine learning) models can accurately predict the crippling load, but the performance of ANN is superior: it delivers the highest value of R2 = 0.998 and the lowest value of RMSE = 0.008 in the training phase, as well as the highest value of R2 = 0.996 and the smaller value of RMSE = 0.012 in the testing phase. Additional methods, including rank analysis, reliability analysis, regression plot, Taylor diagram and error matrix plot, are employed to assess the models’ performance. The reliability index (β) of the models is calculated by using the first-order second moment (FOSM) technique, and the result is compared with the actual value. Additionally, sensitivity analysis is performed to check the impact of the input variables on the output (CL), finding that bf has the greatest impact on the crippling load, followed by tf, tw, H and L, in that order. This study demonstrates that ML techniques are useful for developing a reliable numerical tool for measuring the crippling load of I-shaped steel columns. It is found that the proposed techniques can also be used to predict other kinds of failures as well as different kinds of perforated columns.

利用软计算技术预测工字形钢柱的瘫痪荷载
本研究的主要目的是创建三种机器学习模型:人工神经网络 (ANN)、随机森林 (RF) 和 k-nearest neighbour (KNN),以预测工字形钢柱的残余荷载 (CL)。计算瘫痪荷载(CL)时使用了五个输入参数,即支柱长度(L)、翼缘宽度(bf)、翼缘厚度(tf)、腹板厚度(tw)和支柱高度(H)。一系列性能指标,包括判定系数 (R2)、方差系数 (VAF)、a-10 指数、均方根误差 (RMSE)、平均绝对误差 (MAE) 和平均绝对偏差 (MAD),用于评估已建立的机器学习模型的有效性。结果表明,三种 ML(机器学习)模型都能准确预测瘫痪负荷,但 ANN 的性能更优越:它在训练阶段的 R2 = 0.998 值最高,RMSE = 0.008 值最低,在测试阶段的 R2 = 0.996 值最高,RMSE = 0.012 值较小。此外,还采用了秩分析、可靠性分析、回归图、泰勒图和误差矩阵图等方法来评估模型的性能。使用一阶第二矩(FOSM)技术计算模型的可靠性指数(β),并将结果与实际值进行比较。此外,还进行了敏感性分析,以检查输入变量对输出(CL)的影响,结果发现 bf 对瘫痪载荷的影响最大,其次依次是 tf、tw、H 和 L。这项研究表明,ML 技术有助于开发一种可靠的数值工具,用于测量工字形钢柱的残余荷载。研究发现,所提出的技术还可用于预测其他类型的故障以及不同类型的穿孔柱。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信