Awake lumbar spine surgery performed under spinal versus conventional anesthesia.

Surgical neurology international Pub Date : 2024-10-25 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.25259/SNI_747_2024
Mohamed M Mohi Eldin, Ahmed Salah-Eldin Hassan Abdelaaty, Omar Youssef, Alaa A Abdulkawy, Mohamed Eltoukhy
{"title":"Awake lumbar spine surgery performed under spinal versus conventional anesthesia.","authors":"Mohamed M Mohi Eldin, Ahmed Salah-Eldin Hassan Abdelaaty, Omar Youssef, Alaa A Abdulkawy, Mohamed Eltoukhy","doi":"10.25259/SNI_747_2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Lumbar spine surgery for discectomy or laminectomy is mostly performed under general anesthesia (GA). Here, we explored whether, in a series of 84 patients, better peri-operative outcomes and lower complication rates could be achieved for those undergoing diskectomy/laminectomy under spinal anesthesia (SA) versus GA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From 2022 to 2023, 84 patients were randomly assigned to undergo lumbar discectomy/laminectomy for stenosis under SA: 42 patients versus GAGA: 42 patients. For these two populations, we analyzed and compared multiple variables, including duration of anesthesia, estimated blood loss (EBL), and outcomes (i.e., including pre/post-operative Visual Analogue Scale, Oswestry disability index, and short-form 36 questionnaires).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Major advantages of SA versus GA included a reduced mean EBL, shorter mean operative time, reduced mean hospital length of stay, and fewer post-operative side effects. Notably, baseline heart rate or mean arterial blood pressure showed no significant differences between SA and GA groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Based on this small preliminary sample of patients undergoing lumbar disc/stenosis surgery, it appeared that SA reduced the mean EBL, offered shorter mean operative times, mean hospital lengths of stay, and fewer post-operative side effects versus GA.</p>","PeriodicalId":94217,"journal":{"name":"Surgical neurology international","volume":"15 ","pages":"388"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11544509/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical neurology international","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25259/SNI_747_2024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Lumbar spine surgery for discectomy or laminectomy is mostly performed under general anesthesia (GA). Here, we explored whether, in a series of 84 patients, better peri-operative outcomes and lower complication rates could be achieved for those undergoing diskectomy/laminectomy under spinal anesthesia (SA) versus GA.

Methods: From 2022 to 2023, 84 patients were randomly assigned to undergo lumbar discectomy/laminectomy for stenosis under SA: 42 patients versus GAGA: 42 patients. For these two populations, we analyzed and compared multiple variables, including duration of anesthesia, estimated blood loss (EBL), and outcomes (i.e., including pre/post-operative Visual Analogue Scale, Oswestry disability index, and short-form 36 questionnaires).

Results: Major advantages of SA versus GA included a reduced mean EBL, shorter mean operative time, reduced mean hospital length of stay, and fewer post-operative side effects. Notably, baseline heart rate or mean arterial blood pressure showed no significant differences between SA and GA groups.

Conclusion: Based on this small preliminary sample of patients undergoing lumbar disc/stenosis surgery, it appeared that SA reduced the mean EBL, offered shorter mean operative times, mean hospital lengths of stay, and fewer post-operative side effects versus GA.

脊髓麻醉与常规麻醉下的清醒腰椎手术。
背景:腰椎间盘切除术或椎板切除术大多在全身麻醉(GA)下进行。在此,我们对一系列 84 名患者进行了研究,探讨在脊髓麻醉(SA)下进行腰椎间盘切除术/椎板切除术与在全身麻醉下进行腰椎间盘切除术/椎板切除术相比,是否能获得更好的围手术期效果和更低的并发症发生率:从2022年到2023年,84名患者被随机分配到接受腰椎间盘切除术/椎板切除术治疗腰椎管狭窄症,其中42名患者在SA下接受治疗,42名患者在GAGA下接受治疗。我们对这两组患者的多个变量进行了分析和比较,包括麻醉持续时间、估计失血量(EBL)和结果(即包括术前/术后视觉模拟量表、Oswestry 残疾指数和短式 36 问卷):结果:与GA相比,SA的主要优势包括平均EBL降低、平均手术时间缩短、平均住院时间缩短以及术后副作用减少。值得注意的是,基线心率或平均动脉血压在 SA 组和 GA 组之间没有明显差异:根据对接受腰椎间盘/椎间孔狭窄手术的患者进行的小样本初步研究,与GA相比,SA似乎降低了平均EBL,缩短了平均手术时间和平均住院时间,并减少了术后副作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信