Monitoring of visual-evoked potentials during fat packing in endoscopic resection of a giant pituitary adenoma.

Surgical neurology international Pub Date : 2024-10-25 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.25259/SNI_719_2024
Christopher S Hong, Jakob Ve Gerstl, C Eduardo Corrales, Timothy R Smith, Eva K Ritzl
{"title":"Monitoring of visual-evoked potentials during fat packing in endoscopic resection of a giant pituitary adenoma.","authors":"Christopher S Hong, Jakob Ve Gerstl, C Eduardo Corrales, Timothy R Smith, Eva K Ritzl","doi":"10.25259/SNI_719_2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery has become a mainstay surgical approach for sellar pathologies and can effectively decompress mass effects on the optic nerves. Visual-evoked potentials (VEPs) have been utilized as an intraoperative adjunct during endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery to monitor the integrity of the optic pathways, but the data surrounding its reliability and efficacy remain heterogeneous.</p><p><strong>Case description: </strong>An 80-year-old male underwent endoscopic transsphenoidal resection of a pituitary macroadenoma with preoperative visual deficits related to optic nerve compression. During fat packing of the resection cavity, a decrease in VEPs was noted, which seemingly improved after partial fat removal, although with paradoxically reduced VEP latencies. Despite this, the patient developed a visual field deficit postoperatively, requiring re-operation for further removal of the fat packing.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This was a case of initially poorly formed VEPs that deteriorated and apparently improved following surgical intervention. The finding of shortened latencies of the VEPs was likely from noise contamination, creating the illusion of improved signal amplitudes. We recommend careful assessment of VEP data for baseline reproducibility, particularly in patients with pre-existing visual field deficits. Appropriate anesthetic selection is also important to reduce noise interference from the electroencephalogram.</p>","PeriodicalId":94217,"journal":{"name":"Surgical neurology international","volume":"15 ","pages":"387"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11544513/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical neurology international","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25259/SNI_719_2024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery has become a mainstay surgical approach for sellar pathologies and can effectively decompress mass effects on the optic nerves. Visual-evoked potentials (VEPs) have been utilized as an intraoperative adjunct during endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery to monitor the integrity of the optic pathways, but the data surrounding its reliability and efficacy remain heterogeneous.

Case description: An 80-year-old male underwent endoscopic transsphenoidal resection of a pituitary macroadenoma with preoperative visual deficits related to optic nerve compression. During fat packing of the resection cavity, a decrease in VEPs was noted, which seemingly improved after partial fat removal, although with paradoxically reduced VEP latencies. Despite this, the patient developed a visual field deficit postoperatively, requiring re-operation for further removal of the fat packing.

Conclusion: This was a case of initially poorly formed VEPs that deteriorated and apparently improved following surgical intervention. The finding of shortened latencies of the VEPs was likely from noise contamination, creating the illusion of improved signal amplitudes. We recommend careful assessment of VEP data for baseline reproducibility, particularly in patients with pre-existing visual field deficits. Appropriate anesthetic selection is also important to reduce noise interference from the electroencephalogram.

在内窥镜下切除巨大垂体腺瘤的脂肪填充过程中监测视觉诱发电位。
背景:内窥镜经蝶手术已成为治疗蝶窦病变的主要手术方法,可有效减轻肿块对视神经的影响。视觉诱发电位(VEP)已被用作内窥镜经蝶窦手术的术中辅助手段,以监测视神经通路的完整性,但有关其可靠性和有效性的数据仍不尽相同:一名 80 岁的男性接受了内窥镜经蝶窦垂体大腺瘤切除术,术前出现视力障碍与视神经受压有关。在对切除腔进行脂肪填塞时,发现 VEP 下降,部分脂肪移除后似乎有所改善,但矛盾的是 VEP 潜伏期缩短了。尽管如此,患者术后还是出现了视野缺损,需要再次手术进一步去除脂肪填料:结论:这是一例最初VEP形成不良的病例,手术干预后VEP恶化并明显好转。发现 VEP 的潜伏期缩短很可能是由于噪声污染,造成信号振幅改善的假象。我们建议对 VEP 数据的基线重现性进行仔细评估,尤其是已经存在视野缺损的患者。选择适当的麻醉剂对减少脑电图的噪音干扰也很重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信