Decision fatigue in hospital settings: A scoping review.

Kelsey Perry, Sarah Jones, Julia C Stumpff, Rachel Kruer, Lauren Czosnowski, Deanne Kashiwagi, Areeba Kara
{"title":"Decision fatigue in hospital settings: A scoping review.","authors":"Kelsey Perry, Sarah Jones, Julia C Stumpff, Rachel Kruer, Lauren Czosnowski, Deanne Kashiwagi, Areeba Kara","doi":"10.1002/jhm.13550","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>\"Decision Fatigue\" (DF) describes the impaired ability to make decisions because of repeated acts of decision-making.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We conducted a scoping review to describe DF in inpatient settings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>To be included, studies should have explored a clinical decision, included a mechanism to account for the order of decision making, and be published in English in or after the year 2000. Six databases were searched. Retrieved citations were screened and retained studies were reviewed against the inclusion criteria. References of included studies were manually searched, and forward citation searches were conducted to capture relevant sources.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The search retrieved 12,781 citations, of which 41 were retained following screening. Following review, 16 studies met the inclusion criteria. Half were conference abstracts and none examined hospitalists. Emergency medicine and intensive care settings were the most frequently studied clinical environments (n = 13, 81%). All studies were observational. The most frequently examined decisions were about resource utilization (n = 8, 50%), however only half of these examined downstream clinical outcomes. Decision quality against prespecified standards was examined in four (25%) studies. Work environment and patient attributes were often described but not consistently accounted for in analyses. Clinician attributes were described in four (25%) investigations. Findings were inconsistent: both supporting and refuting DF's role in the outcome studied.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The role of clinician, patient, and work environment attributes in mediating DF is understudied. Similarly, the context surrounding the decision under study require further explication and when assessing resource use and decision quality, adjudication should be made against prespecified standards.</p>","PeriodicalId":94084,"journal":{"name":"Journal of hospital medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of hospital medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jhm.13550","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: "Decision Fatigue" (DF) describes the impaired ability to make decisions because of repeated acts of decision-making.

Objectives: We conducted a scoping review to describe DF in inpatient settings.

Methods: To be included, studies should have explored a clinical decision, included a mechanism to account for the order of decision making, and be published in English in or after the year 2000. Six databases were searched. Retrieved citations were screened and retained studies were reviewed against the inclusion criteria. References of included studies were manually searched, and forward citation searches were conducted to capture relevant sources.

Results: The search retrieved 12,781 citations, of which 41 were retained following screening. Following review, 16 studies met the inclusion criteria. Half were conference abstracts and none examined hospitalists. Emergency medicine and intensive care settings were the most frequently studied clinical environments (n = 13, 81%). All studies were observational. The most frequently examined decisions were about resource utilization (n = 8, 50%), however only half of these examined downstream clinical outcomes. Decision quality against prespecified standards was examined in four (25%) studies. Work environment and patient attributes were often described but not consistently accounted for in analyses. Clinician attributes were described in four (25%) investigations. Findings were inconsistent: both supporting and refuting DF's role in the outcome studied.

Conclusions: The role of clinician, patient, and work environment attributes in mediating DF is understudied. Similarly, the context surrounding the decision under study require further explication and when assessing resource use and decision quality, adjudication should be made against prespecified standards.

医院环境中的决策疲劳:范围综述。
背景:"决策疲劳"(DF"决策疲劳"(DF)是指由于重复决策行为而导致的决策能力受损:目的:我们对住院患者的决策疲劳进行了范围界定:方法:纳入的研究应探讨临床决策,包含决策顺序机制,并在 2000 年或之后以英文发表。共检索了六个数据库。对检索到的引文进行筛选,并根据纳入标准对保留的研究进行审查。对纳入研究的参考文献进行人工检索,并进行前向引文检索以获取相关资料来源:搜索共检索到 12,781 条引文,经筛选后保留了其中的 41 条。经审查,16 项研究符合纳入标准。其中一半是会议摘要,没有一项研究是针对住院医生的。急诊医学和重症监护是最常研究的临床环境(n = 13,81%)。所有研究均为观察性研究。最常研究的决策是关于资源利用的(n = 8,50%),但其中只有一半研究了下游临床结果。有四项研究(25%)根据预设标准对决策质量进行了检查。对工作环境和患者属性的描述经常出现,但在分析中并未一以贯之。四项(25%)研究对临床医生的属性进行了描述。研究结果不一致:既有支持 DF 在研究结果中的作用的,也有反驳 DF 的:结论:临床医生、患者和工作环境属性对 DF 的中介作用研究不足。同样,需要进一步说明所研究决策的相关背景,在评估资源使用和决策质量时,应根据预先规定的标准进行判断。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信