Factors influencing outcome in patients with intramedullary spinal cord tumors undergoing resective surgery.

Surgical neurology international Pub Date : 2024-10-11 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.25259/SNI_309_2024
Manas Kumar Panigrahi, Pratik Koradia, Dilip Kumar, Harshal Dholke, Sudhindra Vooturi
{"title":"Factors influencing outcome in patients with intramedullary spinal cord tumors undergoing resective surgery.","authors":"Manas Kumar Panigrahi, Pratik Koradia, Dilip Kumar, Harshal Dholke, Sudhindra Vooturi","doi":"10.25259/SNI_309_2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We evaluated whether preoperative functional status influenced surgical outcomes for patients with intramedullary spinal cord tumors (IMSCT).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed whether lower preoperative McCormick scores impacted primary outcomes for 78 consecutive patients with IMSCT of World Health Organization (WHO) grades I and II undergoing tumor resection between 2010 and 2018.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients averaged 33.6 years of age, 57.5% were male, and lesions predominantly involved the cervical 23 (29.5%) followed by the thoracic spine 19 (24.3%). Over the average follow-up interval of 69.83 months, IMSCTs recurred in 11.5% of patients, with 6.4% showing functional deterioration. At follow-up, 73.5% of patients with a preoperative modified McCormick score of two or one showed better functional improvement.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The WHO pathological grades I and II did not significantly influence outcomes for patients with intramedullary spinal cord lesions. However, patients with low preoperative McCormick scores (two or one) demonstrated better functional outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":94217,"journal":{"name":"Surgical neurology international","volume":"15 ","pages":"370"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11544476/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical neurology international","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25259/SNI_309_2024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: We evaluated whether preoperative functional status influenced surgical outcomes for patients with intramedullary spinal cord tumors (IMSCT).

Methods: We analyzed whether lower preoperative McCormick scores impacted primary outcomes for 78 consecutive patients with IMSCT of World Health Organization (WHO) grades I and II undergoing tumor resection between 2010 and 2018.

Results: Patients averaged 33.6 years of age, 57.5% were male, and lesions predominantly involved the cervical 23 (29.5%) followed by the thoracic spine 19 (24.3%). Over the average follow-up interval of 69.83 months, IMSCTs recurred in 11.5% of patients, with 6.4% showing functional deterioration. At follow-up, 73.5% of patients with a preoperative modified McCormick score of two or one showed better functional improvement.

Conclusion: The WHO pathological grades I and II did not significantly influence outcomes for patients with intramedullary spinal cord lesions. However, patients with low preoperative McCormick scores (two or one) demonstrated better functional outcomes.

影响接受切除手术的髓内脊髓肿瘤患者预后的因素。
背景我们评估了术前功能状态是否会影响髓内脊髓肿瘤(IMSCT)患者的手术效果:我们分析了术前较低的麦考密克评分是否会影响2010年至2018年期间连续接受肿瘤切除术的78例世界卫生组织(WHO)I级和II级脊髓内肿瘤(IMSCT)患者的主要预后:患者平均年龄33.6岁,57.5%为男性,病变主要累及颈椎23例(29.5%),其次是胸椎19例(24.3%)。在平均 69.83 个月的随访期间,11.5% 的患者 IMSCT 复发,6.4% 的患者功能恶化。在随访中,术前改良麦考密克评分为2分或1分的患者中,73.5%的患者功能改善较好:结论:WHO病理分级I级和II级对髓内脊髓病变患者的预后影响不大。然而,术前麦考密克评分较低(2分或1分)的患者功能改善较好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信