Exploring the hemodynamic behavior of residual aneurysms after coiling and clipping: A computational flow dynamic analysis.

Surgical neurology international Pub Date : 2024-10-18 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.25259/SNI_686_2024
Christopher S Ogilvy, Rafael Trindade Tatit, Vincenzo T R Loly, Felipe Ramirez-Velandia, João S B Lima, Carlos E Baccin
{"title":"Exploring the hemodynamic behavior of residual aneurysms after coiling and clipping: A computational flow dynamic analysis.","authors":"Christopher S Ogilvy, Rafael Trindade Tatit, Vincenzo T R Loly, Felipe Ramirez-Velandia, João S B Lima, Carlos E Baccin","doi":"10.25259/SNI_686_2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Residual intracranial aneurysms post-clipping or coiling pose a poorly established risk of rupture. Computational fluid dynamic (CFD) offers insights into hemodynamic changes following such interventions. This study aims to assess hemodynamic parameters in residual aneurysms pre- and post-treatment with surgical clips or coils using CFD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis of consecutive patients between January 2015 and January 2024 was conducted. Digital subtraction angiography images were reconstructed using 3D modeling techniques, and hemodynamic parameters were analyzed with ANSYS<sup>®</sup> software.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six aneurysms were analyzed: Five unruptured and one ruptured. The aneurysms were located at the basilar apex (2), middle cerebral artery bifurcation (2), and origin of the posterior communicating artery (2). Post-treatment, there was a significant reduction in both aneurysm area (median reduction of 33.73%) and volume (median reduction of 25.3%). Five of the six cases demonstrated fewer low wall shear stress (WSS) areas, which could indicate a reduction in regions prone to thrombus formation and diminished risk of rupture. In the unruptured aneurysms, there was a median increase of 137.6% in average WSS. Notably, the only case with increased low WSS area also had the highest increase in average WSS. One basilar artery aneurysm showed increased WSS across all parameters, suggesting a higher rupture risk.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The increase in average and high WSS area, along with a decrease in low WSS area, reflects a complex balance between factors of stability and rupture risk. However, a simultaneous increase in all WSS parameters may represent the highest rupture risk due to increased mechanical stress on the aneurysm wall, necessitating closer monitoring.</p>","PeriodicalId":94217,"journal":{"name":"Surgical neurology international","volume":"15 ","pages":"376"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11544462/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical neurology international","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25259/SNI_686_2024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Residual intracranial aneurysms post-clipping or coiling pose a poorly established risk of rupture. Computational fluid dynamic (CFD) offers insights into hemodynamic changes following such interventions. This study aims to assess hemodynamic parameters in residual aneurysms pre- and post-treatment with surgical clips or coils using CFD.

Methods: A retrospective analysis of consecutive patients between January 2015 and January 2024 was conducted. Digital subtraction angiography images were reconstructed using 3D modeling techniques, and hemodynamic parameters were analyzed with ANSYS® software.

Results: Six aneurysms were analyzed: Five unruptured and one ruptured. The aneurysms were located at the basilar apex (2), middle cerebral artery bifurcation (2), and origin of the posterior communicating artery (2). Post-treatment, there was a significant reduction in both aneurysm area (median reduction of 33.73%) and volume (median reduction of 25.3%). Five of the six cases demonstrated fewer low wall shear stress (WSS) areas, which could indicate a reduction in regions prone to thrombus formation and diminished risk of rupture. In the unruptured aneurysms, there was a median increase of 137.6% in average WSS. Notably, the only case with increased low WSS area also had the highest increase in average WSS. One basilar artery aneurysm showed increased WSS across all parameters, suggesting a higher rupture risk.

Conclusion: The increase in average and high WSS area, along with a decrease in low WSS area, reflects a complex balance between factors of stability and rupture risk. However, a simultaneous increase in all WSS parameters may represent the highest rupture risk due to increased mechanical stress on the aneurysm wall, necessitating closer monitoring.

探索夹闭术后残余动脉瘤的血流动力学行为:计算血流动力学分析。
背景:颅内动脉瘤夹闭或夹闭后残留的破裂风险尚未得到充分证实。计算流体动力学(CFD)为了解此类干预后的血流动力学变化提供了见解。本研究旨在利用 CFD 评估残余动脉瘤在使用手术夹或线圈治疗前后的血液动力学参数:方法:对 2015 年 1 月至 2024 年 1 月期间的连续患者进行回顾性分析。使用三维建模技术重建数字减影血管造影图像,并使用 ANSYS® 软件分析血液动力学参数:结果:分析了六个动脉瘤:结果:分析了六个动脉瘤:五个未破裂,一个破裂。动脉瘤分别位于基底动脉顶(2 个)、大脑中动脉分叉处(2 个)和后交通动脉起源处(2 个)。治疗后,动脉瘤面积(中位数减少 33.73%)和体积(中位数减少 25.3%)均显著缩小。六个病例中有五个病例的低壁剪应力(WSS)区域减少,这可能表明容易形成血栓的区域减少,破裂的风险降低。在未破裂的动脉瘤中,平均 WSS 中位数增加了 137.6%。值得注意的是,唯一一个低 WSS 面积增加的病例,其平均 WSS 的增幅也是最高的。一个基底动脉瘤显示所有参数的 WSS 均增加,表明破裂风险较高:结论:平均和高 WSS 面积的增加以及低 WSS 面积的减少反映了稳定性和破裂风险因素之间复杂的平衡。然而,所有 WSS 参数的同时增加可能代表着动脉瘤壁机械应力的增加导致了最高的破裂风险,因此有必要进行更密切的监测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信