Radiomics-Based Diagnosis in Dentomaxillofacial Radiology: A Systematic Review.

Özge Dönmez Tarakçı, Hatice Cansu Kış, Hakan Amasya, İrem Öztürk, Emre Karahan, Kaan Orhan
{"title":"Radiomics-Based Diagnosis in Dentomaxillofacial Radiology: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Özge Dönmez Tarakçı, Hatice Cansu Kış, Hakan Amasya, İrem Öztürk, Emre Karahan, Kaan Orhan","doi":"10.1007/s10278-024-01307-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Radiomics is a quantitative tool for digital image analysis. This systematic review aims to investigate the scientific articles to evaluate the potential implications of Radiomics analysis in Dentomaxillofacial Radiology (DMFR). Studies regarding Radiomics applications in DMFR and human samples, in vivo study, a case reports/series if ≧5 samples were included, while case reports/series if < 5 samples, articles other than in English, abstracts without full text, and studies published before 2015 were excluded. Fifty-one articles were selected from 3789 literatures. The QUADAS-2 tool was used for risk of bias assessment. The accuracy of predicting dentomaxillofacial pathologies was considered as the primary outcome, and the modeling type of Radiomics was considered as the secondary outcome. A meta-analysis could not be performed due to the lack of information and standardization among the reported accuracies. The reported accuracies were found between 0.66 and 99.65%. Logistic regression (n = 6) was found to be the most common Radiomics modeling type, followed by Support Vector Machine and Decision Tree (n = 5). Second-order statistics (n = 38) was the most common type of Radiomics application, followed by first-order (n = 26), higher-order (n = 20), and shape-based (n = 15) statistics. Further work is needed to increase standardization in the Radiomics workflow. Quantitative image analysis is an alternative tool for conventional visual radiographic evaluation. Radiomics systems depend on elements such as imaging modality, feature type, data mining, or statistical method. Radiomics applications do not justify digital transformation on their own, but the potential of its integration into the digital workflow is considerable.</p>","PeriodicalId":516858,"journal":{"name":"Journal of imaging informatics in medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of imaging informatics in medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-024-01307-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Radiomics is a quantitative tool for digital image analysis. This systematic review aims to investigate the scientific articles to evaluate the potential implications of Radiomics analysis in Dentomaxillofacial Radiology (DMFR). Studies regarding Radiomics applications in DMFR and human samples, in vivo study, a case reports/series if ≧5 samples were included, while case reports/series if < 5 samples, articles other than in English, abstracts without full text, and studies published before 2015 were excluded. Fifty-one articles were selected from 3789 literatures. The QUADAS-2 tool was used for risk of bias assessment. The accuracy of predicting dentomaxillofacial pathologies was considered as the primary outcome, and the modeling type of Radiomics was considered as the secondary outcome. A meta-analysis could not be performed due to the lack of information and standardization among the reported accuracies. The reported accuracies were found between 0.66 and 99.65%. Logistic regression (n = 6) was found to be the most common Radiomics modeling type, followed by Support Vector Machine and Decision Tree (n = 5). Second-order statistics (n = 38) was the most common type of Radiomics application, followed by first-order (n = 26), higher-order (n = 20), and shape-based (n = 15) statistics. Further work is needed to increase standardization in the Radiomics workflow. Quantitative image analysis is an alternative tool for conventional visual radiographic evaluation. Radiomics systems depend on elements such as imaging modality, feature type, data mining, or statistical method. Radiomics applications do not justify digital transformation on their own, but the potential of its integration into the digital workflow is considerable.

牙颌面放射学中基于放射组学的诊断:系统综述。
放射组学是一种用于数字图像分析的定量工具。本系统综述旨在调查科学文章,评估放射组学分析在牙颌面放射学(DMFR)中的潜在影响。有关放射组学在牙颌面放射学(DMFR)和人体样本中应用的研究、体内研究、病例报告/系列(如果样本数≧5)均包括在内,而病例报告/系列(如果样本数≧5)则不包括在内。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信