Özge Dönmez Tarakçı, Hatice Cansu Kış, Hakan Amasya, İrem Öztürk, Emre Karahan, Kaan Orhan
{"title":"Radiomics-Based Diagnosis in Dentomaxillofacial Radiology: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Özge Dönmez Tarakçı, Hatice Cansu Kış, Hakan Amasya, İrem Öztürk, Emre Karahan, Kaan Orhan","doi":"10.1007/s10278-024-01307-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Radiomics is a quantitative tool for digital image analysis. This systematic review aims to investigate the scientific articles to evaluate the potential implications of Radiomics analysis in Dentomaxillofacial Radiology (DMFR). Studies regarding Radiomics applications in DMFR and human samples, in vivo study, a case reports/series if ≧5 samples were included, while case reports/series if < 5 samples, articles other than in English, abstracts without full text, and studies published before 2015 were excluded. Fifty-one articles were selected from 3789 literatures. The QUADAS-2 tool was used for risk of bias assessment. The accuracy of predicting dentomaxillofacial pathologies was considered as the primary outcome, and the modeling type of Radiomics was considered as the secondary outcome. A meta-analysis could not be performed due to the lack of information and standardization among the reported accuracies. The reported accuracies were found between 0.66 and 99.65%. Logistic regression (n = 6) was found to be the most common Radiomics modeling type, followed by Support Vector Machine and Decision Tree (n = 5). Second-order statistics (n = 38) was the most common type of Radiomics application, followed by first-order (n = 26), higher-order (n = 20), and shape-based (n = 15) statistics. Further work is needed to increase standardization in the Radiomics workflow. Quantitative image analysis is an alternative tool for conventional visual radiographic evaluation. Radiomics systems depend on elements such as imaging modality, feature type, data mining, or statistical method. Radiomics applications do not justify digital transformation on their own, but the potential of its integration into the digital workflow is considerable.</p>","PeriodicalId":516858,"journal":{"name":"Journal of imaging informatics in medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of imaging informatics in medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-024-01307-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Radiomics is a quantitative tool for digital image analysis. This systematic review aims to investigate the scientific articles to evaluate the potential implications of Radiomics analysis in Dentomaxillofacial Radiology (DMFR). Studies regarding Radiomics applications in DMFR and human samples, in vivo study, a case reports/series if ≧5 samples were included, while case reports/series if < 5 samples, articles other than in English, abstracts without full text, and studies published before 2015 were excluded. Fifty-one articles were selected from 3789 literatures. The QUADAS-2 tool was used for risk of bias assessment. The accuracy of predicting dentomaxillofacial pathologies was considered as the primary outcome, and the modeling type of Radiomics was considered as the secondary outcome. A meta-analysis could not be performed due to the lack of information and standardization among the reported accuracies. The reported accuracies were found between 0.66 and 99.65%. Logistic regression (n = 6) was found to be the most common Radiomics modeling type, followed by Support Vector Machine and Decision Tree (n = 5). Second-order statistics (n = 38) was the most common type of Radiomics application, followed by first-order (n = 26), higher-order (n = 20), and shape-based (n = 15) statistics. Further work is needed to increase standardization in the Radiomics workflow. Quantitative image analysis is an alternative tool for conventional visual radiographic evaluation. Radiomics systems depend on elements such as imaging modality, feature type, data mining, or statistical method. Radiomics applications do not justify digital transformation on their own, but the potential of its integration into the digital workflow is considerable.