[Research Report on the Consistency of Radiation Dose Structured Report (RDSR)].

Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai zasshi Pub Date : 2024-12-20 Epub Date: 2024-11-14 DOI:10.6009/jjrt.2024-1463
Yoshihiro Nakada, Hidetaka Hayashi, Yasuo Okuda, Masamichi Aita, Yasushi Katsunuma, Minoru Kawamata, Hideki Shibata, Tatsuya Tsuge, Kazuhisa Furuta, Tadashi Miyanishi, Kyohei Morimoto, Yusuke Yamashita
{"title":"[Research Report on the Consistency of Radiation Dose Structured Report (RDSR)].","authors":"Yoshihiro Nakada, Hidetaka Hayashi, Yasuo Okuda, Masamichi Aita, Yasushi Katsunuma, Minoru Kawamata, Hideki Shibata, Tatsuya Tsuge, Kazuhisa Furuta, Tadashi Miyanishi, Kyohei Morimoto, Yusuke Yamashita","doi":"10.6009/jjrt.2024-1463","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In 2020, recording and management of exposure doses for computed tomography (CT) became mandatory. In terms of dose management, information regarding the imaged body part is particularly important information for proper tabulation. However, the actual body part to be imaged and the body part information obtained from the device may differ. In this study, we investigated the difference between the imaged area information obtained from a CT device and the dose index when the area is divided into actual areas to be examined using a facility's unique imaging protocol. We collected 734784 radiation dose structured reports (RDSR) examined from 2014 to 2021 on CT equipment at 8 facilities and analyzed each facility's volume CT dose index (CTDI<sub>vol</sub>) and dose length product (DLP). The median values were tabulated and compared. Pre- and post-classing the body part, for CTDI<sub>vol</sub>, increasing tendency was observed only in the head and abdomen. A similar trend was observed for DLP. Regarding dose management using RDSR as an information source, there were no major differences in dose information depending on the classification of the body part to be imaged. We hope that the accuracy of dose management will be improved by accurately classifying the body parts to be imaged.</p>","PeriodicalId":74309,"journal":{"name":"Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai zasshi","volume":" ","pages":"1322-1327"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai zasshi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6009/jjrt.2024-1463","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In 2020, recording and management of exposure doses for computed tomography (CT) became mandatory. In terms of dose management, information regarding the imaged body part is particularly important information for proper tabulation. However, the actual body part to be imaged and the body part information obtained from the device may differ. In this study, we investigated the difference between the imaged area information obtained from a CT device and the dose index when the area is divided into actual areas to be examined using a facility's unique imaging protocol. We collected 734784 radiation dose structured reports (RDSR) examined from 2014 to 2021 on CT equipment at 8 facilities and analyzed each facility's volume CT dose index (CTDIvol) and dose length product (DLP). The median values were tabulated and compared. Pre- and post-classing the body part, for CTDIvol, increasing tendency was observed only in the head and abdomen. A similar trend was observed for DLP. Regarding dose management using RDSR as an information source, there were no major differences in dose information depending on the classification of the body part to be imaged. We hope that the accuracy of dose management will be improved by accurately classifying the body parts to be imaged.

[辐射剂量结构化报告(RDSR)一致性研究报告]。
2020 年,记录和管理计算机断层扫描(CT)的照射剂量成为强制性规定。在剂量管理方面,有关成像身体部位的信息对于正确制表尤为重要。然而,实际成像的身体部位和从设备中获得的身体部位信息可能不同。在这项研究中,我们调查了当使用设备的独特成像协议将成像区域划分为实际检查区域时,从 CT 设备获取的成像区域信息与剂量指数之间的差异。我们收集了 2014 年至 2021 年期间在 8 家医疗机构的 CT 设备上检查的 734784 份辐射剂量结构报告(RDSR),并分析了每家医疗机构的容积 CT 剂量指数(CTDIvol)和剂量长度乘积(DLP)。中位值被制成表格并进行比较。在对身体部位进行分类之前和之后,仅在头部和腹部观察到 CTDIvol 呈上升趋势。DLP 也有类似趋势。关于使用 RDSR 作为信息源的剂量管理,剂量信息并没有因人体成像部位的分类而产生重大差异。我们希望通过对人体成像部位的准确分类来提高剂量管理的准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信