Metal stent versus plastic stent in endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy for unresectable malignant biliary obstruction: Large single-center retrospective comparative study

Abstract

Objective

Whether metal stents (MS) or plastic stents (PS) yield better outcomes for malignant biliary obstruction in endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy (EUS-HGS) is controversial. We aimed to compare outcomes of initial EUS-HGS performed with MS or PS.

Methods

In this single-center retrospective study, we included patients (MS/PS groups: n = 151/72) with unresectable malignant biliary obstruction and performed multivariable analysis. The landmark date was defined as day 100 and used to evaluate the time to recurrent biliary obstruction (TRBO).

Results

The clinical success rate was similar in both groups. The mean total bilirubin percentage decrease at week 2 was significantly higher in the MS group than in the PS group (−45.1% vs. −23.7%, P = 0.016). Median TRBO was significantly different between the MS and PS groups (183 and 92 days, respectively; P = 0.017). TRBO within 100 days was comparable in both groups but was significantly shorter only after 100 days in the PS group (adjusted hazard ratio 12.8, P < 0.001). Adverse events were significantly more common in the MS group (23.8% vs. 9.7%, P = 0.012), although they occurred relatively frequently even with PS in the cholangitis subgroup (P_interaction = 0.034). After endoscopic re-intervention, TRBO tended to be longer with revision PS (hazard ratio 0.40, P = 0.47).

Conclusions

Although MS provided early improvement of jaundice and long stent patency, PS provided a better safety profile and comparable stent patency until 100 days. PS might also be an adequate and optimal palliation method in EUS-HGS.