Development and Validation of a Simulation Model for Ureteral Stent Placement.

IF 0.8 Q4 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Nicole J Wood, Laura J Cheng, Dylan Buller, Dmitry Volkin, David M O'Sullivan, Elena Tunitsky-Bitton
{"title":"Development and Validation of a Simulation Model for Ureteral Stent Placement.","authors":"Nicole J Wood, Laura J Cheng, Dylan Buller, Dmitry Volkin, David M O'Sullivan, Elena Tunitsky-Bitton","doi":"10.1097/SPV.0000000000001598","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Currently, there are no validated training models for cystoscopy with ureteral stent placement.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The objectives of this study were to develop and validate a novel endoscopic simulation model for training in ureteral stent placement.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>A low-cost, low-fidelity training model was developed to simulate ureteral stent placement. Recruited participants were divided into 3 groups: novices (postgraduate year 3/4 gynecology residents), advanced learners (urogynecology and reconstructive pelvic surgery fellows), and experts (urology residents, urogynecology faculty, and urology faculty). Construct validity was measured using de-identified video-recorded performances on the model, which were evaluated by 2 expert reviewers using validated scales (Global Operative Assessment of Laparoscopic Skills [GOALS], Global Rating Scale [GRS]) and procedure-specific metrics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The model was created using a hollow Styrofoam sphere, plastic tubing from a retropubic sling, and a silicone pacifier. Thirty-six surgeons were assessed performing the procedure using the model with cystoscopic equipment. The experts (n = 12) performed significantly better than the advanced learners (n = 17) and novices (n = 7) in total scores (max 75, median [IQR]: 75 [75-75], 61 [56.5-68.5], 45 [43-46], respectively; P < 0.001) and within each individual scale domain. Increasing experience with ureteral stent placement had a significant correlation (P < 0.001) with better performance on the model. A minimum total passing score of 63 was established. On post simulation assessment, most participants \"agreed\" or \"strongly agreed\" that the model closely approximates the feel of ureteral stent placement.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This ureteral stenting simulation model is easy to construct, affordable, and reproducible. The model is valid and reliable for practicing the procedure in preparation for live surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":75288,"journal":{"name":"Urogynecology (Hagerstown, Md.)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urogynecology (Hagerstown, Md.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SPV.0000000000001598","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: Currently, there are no validated training models for cystoscopy with ureteral stent placement.

Objectives: The objectives of this study were to develop and validate a novel endoscopic simulation model for training in ureteral stent placement.

Study design: A low-cost, low-fidelity training model was developed to simulate ureteral stent placement. Recruited participants were divided into 3 groups: novices (postgraduate year 3/4 gynecology residents), advanced learners (urogynecology and reconstructive pelvic surgery fellows), and experts (urology residents, urogynecology faculty, and urology faculty). Construct validity was measured using de-identified video-recorded performances on the model, which were evaluated by 2 expert reviewers using validated scales (Global Operative Assessment of Laparoscopic Skills [GOALS], Global Rating Scale [GRS]) and procedure-specific metrics.

Results: The model was created using a hollow Styrofoam sphere, plastic tubing from a retropubic sling, and a silicone pacifier. Thirty-six surgeons were assessed performing the procedure using the model with cystoscopic equipment. The experts (n = 12) performed significantly better than the advanced learners (n = 17) and novices (n = 7) in total scores (max 75, median [IQR]: 75 [75-75], 61 [56.5-68.5], 45 [43-46], respectively; P < 0.001) and within each individual scale domain. Increasing experience with ureteral stent placement had a significant correlation (P < 0.001) with better performance on the model. A minimum total passing score of 63 was established. On post simulation assessment, most participants "agreed" or "strongly agreed" that the model closely approximates the feel of ureteral stent placement.

Conclusion: This ureteral stenting simulation model is easy to construct, affordable, and reproducible. The model is valid and reliable for practicing the procedure in preparation for live surgery.

输尿管支架植入模拟模型的开发与验证
重要性:目前,还没有经过验证的输尿管支架置入膀胱镜培训模型:本研究旨在开发和验证一种新型内窥镜模拟模型,用于输尿管支架置入术的培训:研究设计:开发了一种低成本、低逼真度的培训模型,用于模拟输尿管支架置入。招募的参与者分为 3 组:新手(妇科研究生 3/4 年级住院医师)、进修者(泌尿妇科和盆腔整形外科研究员)和专家(泌尿外科住院医师、泌尿妇科教师和泌尿外科教师)。两位专家评审员使用经过验证的量表(腹腔镜技能全球操作评估量表[GOALS]、全球评分量表[GRS])和特定手术指标对模型进行了评估:该模型是用一个空心泡沫塑料球、后耻骨吊带的塑料管和硅胶奶嘴制作的。对 36 名外科医生使用该模型和膀胱镜设备进行手术的情况进行了评估。在总分(最高 75 分,中位数 [IQR]:分别为 75 [75-75]、61 [56.5-68.5]、45 [43-46];P < 0.001)和每个量表域中,专家(12 人)的表现明显优于进修者(17 人)和新手(7 人)。输尿管支架置入经验的增加与模型成绩的提高有显著相关性(P < 0.001)。最低及格总分为 63 分。在模拟后评估中,大多数参与者 "同意 "或 "非常同意 "该模型非常接近输尿管支架置入的感觉:结论:该输尿管支架置入模拟模型易于构建、经济实惠且可重复使用。结论:该输尿管支架置入模拟模型易于构建、价格适中且可重复使用,对于为现场手术做准备的手术练习是有效和可靠的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信