Telehealth adoption for substance use and mental health disorders in Minnesota and North Dakota: a quasi-experimental study.

IF 2.2 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
mHealth Pub Date : 2024-10-17 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.21037/mhealth-24-43
Akshaya Srikanth Bhagavathula, Diana Lopez-Soto
{"title":"Telehealth adoption for substance use and mental health disorders in Minnesota and North Dakota: a quasi-experimental study.","authors":"Akshaya Srikanth Bhagavathula, Diana Lopez-Soto","doi":"10.21037/mhealth-24-43","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic necessitated rapid adoption of telehealth services to maintain healthcare access for treating substance use disorders (SUDs) and mental health care (MHC). However, the impacts of telehealth expansion policies adopted in 2020 on access to addiction treatment in North Dakota (ND) and Minnesota (MN) remain unclear. This study examines the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on utilization of telehealth services for SUDs and MHC in ND and MN.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a quasi-experimental study design using Medicaid telehealth claims data from 2018 to 2022. Segmented regression analysis of interrupted time series (ITS) data was employed to assess the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic (March 2020) on telehealth service utilization.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 2018 to 2022, there were 580,186 telehealth claims for SUDs (MN: 545,676; ND: 34,510) and 3.4 million claims for MHC (MN: 3.3 million; ND: 85,391). The mean telehealth utilization rate for SUDs was 5.2 <i>vs.</i> 7.3 per 1,000 beneficiaries and for MHC was 12.6 <i>vs.</i> 45.2 per 1,000 beneficiaries in ND and MN, respectively. The pandemic led to significant increases in telehealth use: ND (SUDs: +22.7/1,000; MHC: +59.8/1,000) and MN (SUDs: +30/1,000; MHC: +185.5/1,000). ND saw smaller initial increases but more gradual declines over time (SUDs: -0.42/1,000/month; MHC: -1.03/1,000/month) compared to MN (SUDs: -0.43/1,000/month; MHC: -2.78/1,000/month).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The COVID-19 pandemic significantly increased Medicaid telehealth utilization for SUDs and MHC in both states. MN experienced larger initial increases with steeper declines, while ND showed more sustainable utilization trends, indicating potential for sustained improvements in access to behavioral health services.</p>","PeriodicalId":74181,"journal":{"name":"mHealth","volume":"10 ","pages":"31"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11557159/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"mHealth","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/mhealth-24-43","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic necessitated rapid adoption of telehealth services to maintain healthcare access for treating substance use disorders (SUDs) and mental health care (MHC). However, the impacts of telehealth expansion policies adopted in 2020 on access to addiction treatment in North Dakota (ND) and Minnesota (MN) remain unclear. This study examines the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on utilization of telehealth services for SUDs and MHC in ND and MN.

Methods: We conducted a quasi-experimental study design using Medicaid telehealth claims data from 2018 to 2022. Segmented regression analysis of interrupted time series (ITS) data was employed to assess the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic (March 2020) on telehealth service utilization.

Results: From 2018 to 2022, there were 580,186 telehealth claims for SUDs (MN: 545,676; ND: 34,510) and 3.4 million claims for MHC (MN: 3.3 million; ND: 85,391). The mean telehealth utilization rate for SUDs was 5.2 vs. 7.3 per 1,000 beneficiaries and for MHC was 12.6 vs. 45.2 per 1,000 beneficiaries in ND and MN, respectively. The pandemic led to significant increases in telehealth use: ND (SUDs: +22.7/1,000; MHC: +59.8/1,000) and MN (SUDs: +30/1,000; MHC: +185.5/1,000). ND saw smaller initial increases but more gradual declines over time (SUDs: -0.42/1,000/month; MHC: -1.03/1,000/month) compared to MN (SUDs: -0.43/1,000/month; MHC: -2.78/1,000/month).

Conclusions: The COVID-19 pandemic significantly increased Medicaid telehealth utilization for SUDs and MHC in both states. MN experienced larger initial increases with steeper declines, while ND showed more sustainable utilization trends, indicating potential for sustained improvements in access to behavioral health services.

明尼苏达州和北达科他州采用远程保健治疗药物使用和精神疾病:准实验研究。
背景:由于 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行,有必要迅速采用远程医疗服务,以维持治疗药物使用障碍(SUD)和精神卫生保健(MHC)的医疗服务。然而,2020 年通过的远程医疗扩展政策对北达科他州 (ND) 和明尼苏达州 (MN) 戒毒治疗的影响仍不清楚。本研究探讨了 COVID-19 大流行对北达科他州和明尼苏达州利用远程医疗服务治疗 SUDs 和 MHC 的影响:我们使用 2018 年至 2022 年的医疗补助远程医疗报销数据进行了准实验研究设计。对中断时间序列(ITS)数据进行分段回归分析,以评估 COVID-19 大流行(2020 年 3 月)对远程医疗服务利用率的影响:从 2018 年到 2022 年,共有 580,186 份针对 SUDs 的远程保健申请(明尼苏达州:545,676 份;北达科他州:34,510 份)和 340 万份针对 MHC 的申请(明尼苏达州:330 万份;北达科他州:85,391 份)。在北达科他州和明尼苏达州,SUDs 和 MHC 的平均远程医疗使用率分别为每千名受益人 5.2 次和 7.3 次,每千名受益人分别为 12.6 次和 45.2 次。大流行导致远程医疗的使用显著增加:北达科他州(SUDs:+22.7/1,000;MHC:+59.8/1,000)和明尼苏达州(SUDs:+30/1,000;MHC:+185.5/1,000)。与明尼苏达州(SUDs:-0.43/1,000/月;MHC:-2.78/1,000/月)相比,北达科他州最初的增长幅度较小,但随着时间的推移逐渐下降(SUDs:-0.42/1,000/月;MHC:-1.03/1,000/月):结论:COVID-19 大流行显著增加了这两个州的医疗补助远程医疗对 SUDs 和 MHC 的使用。明尼苏达州最初的增长幅度较大,但下降幅度较小,而新罕布什尔州则呈现出更可持续的使用趋势,这表明该州有可能持续改善行为健康服务的可及性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信