Testing process for artificial intelligence applications in radiology practice

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Juuso H.J. Ketola , Satu I. Inkinen , Teemu Mäkelä , Suvi Syväranta , Juha Peltonen , Touko Kaasalainen , Mika Kortesniemi
{"title":"Testing process for artificial intelligence applications in radiology practice","authors":"Juuso H.J. Ketola ,&nbsp;Satu I. Inkinen ,&nbsp;Teemu Mäkelä ,&nbsp;Suvi Syväranta ,&nbsp;Juha Peltonen ,&nbsp;Touko Kaasalainen ,&nbsp;Mika Kortesniemi","doi":"10.1016/j.ejmp.2024.104842","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Artificial intelligence (AI) applications are becoming increasingly common in radiology. However, ensuring reliable operation and expected clinical benefits remains a challenge. A systematic testing process aims to facilitate clinical deployment by confirming software applicability to local patient populations, practises, adherence to regulatory and safety requirements, and compatibility with existing systems. In this work, we present our testing process developed based on practical experience. First, a survey and pre-evaluation is conducted, where information requests are sent for potential products, and the specifications are evaluated against predetermined requirements. In the second phase, data collection, testing, and analysis are conducted. In the retrospective stage, the application undergoes testing with a pre selected dataset and is evaluated against specified key performance indicators (KPIs). In the prospective stage, the application is integrated into the clinical workflow and evaluated with additional process-specific KPIs. In the final phase, the results are evaluated in terms of safety, effectiveness, productivity, and integration. The final report summarises the results and includes a procurement/deployment or rejection recommendation. The process allows termination at any phase if the application fails to meet essential criteria. In addition, we present practical remarks from our experiences in AI testing and provide forms to guide and document the testing process. The established AI testing process facilitates a systematic evaluation and documentation of new technologies ensuring that each application undergoes equal and sufficient validation. Testing with local data is crucial for identifying biases and pitfalls of AI algorithms to improve the quality and safety, ultimately benefiting patient care.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56092,"journal":{"name":"Physica Medica-European Journal of Medical Physics","volume":"128 ","pages":"Article 104842"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physica Medica-European Journal of Medical Physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1120179724010998","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) applications are becoming increasingly common in radiology. However, ensuring reliable operation and expected clinical benefits remains a challenge. A systematic testing process aims to facilitate clinical deployment by confirming software applicability to local patient populations, practises, adherence to regulatory and safety requirements, and compatibility with existing systems. In this work, we present our testing process developed based on practical experience. First, a survey and pre-evaluation is conducted, where information requests are sent for potential products, and the specifications are evaluated against predetermined requirements. In the second phase, data collection, testing, and analysis are conducted. In the retrospective stage, the application undergoes testing with a pre selected dataset and is evaluated against specified key performance indicators (KPIs). In the prospective stage, the application is integrated into the clinical workflow and evaluated with additional process-specific KPIs. In the final phase, the results are evaluated in terms of safety, effectiveness, productivity, and integration. The final report summarises the results and includes a procurement/deployment or rejection recommendation. The process allows termination at any phase if the application fails to meet essential criteria. In addition, we present practical remarks from our experiences in AI testing and provide forms to guide and document the testing process. The established AI testing process facilitates a systematic evaluation and documentation of new technologies ensuring that each application undergoes equal and sufficient validation. Testing with local data is crucial for identifying biases and pitfalls of AI algorithms to improve the quality and safety, ultimately benefiting patient care.
放射学实践中人工智能应用的测试流程。
人工智能(AI)应用在放射学中越来越普遍。然而,确保可靠运行和预期临床效益仍是一项挑战。系统化的测试流程旨在通过确认软件是否适用于当地患者群体、实践、是否符合法规和安全要求以及与现有系统的兼容性来促进临床部署。在这项工作中,我们介绍了根据实践经验开发的测试流程。首先,进行调查和预评估,向潜在产品发送信息请求,并根据预先确定的要求对产品规格进行评估。第二阶段是数据收集、测试和分析。在回溯阶段,应用程序将使用预先选定的数据集进行测试,并根据指定的关键性能指标(KPI)进行评估。在前瞻性阶段,应用程序被整合到临床工作流程中,并根据其他特定流程的关键绩效指标进行评估。在最后阶段,将从安全性、有效性、生产率和集成度等方面对结果进行评估。最终报告对结果进行总结,包括采购/部署或拒绝建议。如果申请不符合基本标准,该流程允许在任何阶段终止。此外,我们还介绍了我们在人工智能测试方面的实际经验,并提供了指导和记录测试过程的表格。既定的人工智能测试流程有助于对新技术进行系统评估和记录,确保每个应用程序都经过平等和充分的验证。使用本地数据进行测试对于识别人工智能算法的偏差和缺陷以提高质量和安全性至关重要,最终有利于患者护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
14.70%
发文量
493
审稿时长
78 days
期刊介绍: Physica Medica, European Journal of Medical Physics, publishing with Elsevier from 2007, provides an international forum for research and reviews on the following main topics: Medical Imaging Radiation Therapy Radiation Protection Measuring Systems and Signal Processing Education and training in Medical Physics Professional issues in Medical Physics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信