Fertiloscopy and its place in the gynaecologist's armamentarium.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Stewart McNamara, Kimberley J Davis, Lionel Reyftmann
{"title":"Fertiloscopy and its place in the gynaecologist's armamentarium.","authors":"Stewart McNamara, Kimberley J Davis, Lionel Reyftmann","doi":"10.1111/ajo.13894","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Infertility is a prevalent issue worldwide. Current investigation of female pelvic infertility uses transabdominal laparoscopy, exposing patients to its associated risks. An alternative method is fertiloscopy, comprising hysteroscopy, tubal dye studies, and transvaginal hydrolaparoscopy (TVHL), falling under the broader category of VNOTES. This study reviews fertiloscopy cases in Australia to assess its role in managing infertility.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Retrospective analysis of 76 cases was performed with review of imaging results, fertiloscopy findings and interventions, and fertility outcomes. Statistical analysis was conducted via R Studio v4.1 with means and averages used for descriptive data and a Kruskal-Wallis analysis of variance test used to evaluate differences in continuous variables. Kaplan-Meier curves were constructed to describe cumulative pregnancy incidence, with differences evaluated using log-rank tests. Statistical tests were two-tailed, and a P-value < 0.05 was considered significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 76 cases, 70 underwent fertiloscopy and 35 an intra-operative intervention. Of the cohort, 53 conceived, 18 spontaneously. The highest chance of spontaneous conception was 44% by day 283. The failure rate of fertiloscopy was 5.3%, and complications occurred in 1.3% of cases.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The highest chance of spontaneous conception post-fertiloscopy was 44% by day 283, possibly indicating the time between the procedure and referral to reproductive therapies. This study identified a low associated failure and complication rate, supporting fertiloscopy as a low-risk procedure.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite limitations, this study highlights spontaneous pregnancy outcomes and associated low complication and failure rates, emphasising fertiloscopy's role in managing infertility in Australia as a lower risk surgical alternative to standard laparoscopy.</p>","PeriodicalId":55429,"journal":{"name":"Australian & New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian & New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ajo.13894","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Infertility is a prevalent issue worldwide. Current investigation of female pelvic infertility uses transabdominal laparoscopy, exposing patients to its associated risks. An alternative method is fertiloscopy, comprising hysteroscopy, tubal dye studies, and transvaginal hydrolaparoscopy (TVHL), falling under the broader category of VNOTES. This study reviews fertiloscopy cases in Australia to assess its role in managing infertility.

Materials and methods: Retrospective analysis of 76 cases was performed with review of imaging results, fertiloscopy findings and interventions, and fertility outcomes. Statistical analysis was conducted via R Studio v4.1 with means and averages used for descriptive data and a Kruskal-Wallis analysis of variance test used to evaluate differences in continuous variables. Kaplan-Meier curves were constructed to describe cumulative pregnancy incidence, with differences evaluated using log-rank tests. Statistical tests were two-tailed, and a P-value < 0.05 was considered significant.

Results: Of 76 cases, 70 underwent fertiloscopy and 35 an intra-operative intervention. Of the cohort, 53 conceived, 18 spontaneously. The highest chance of spontaneous conception was 44% by day 283. The failure rate of fertiloscopy was 5.3%, and complications occurred in 1.3% of cases.

Discussion: The highest chance of spontaneous conception post-fertiloscopy was 44% by day 283, possibly indicating the time between the procedure and referral to reproductive therapies. This study identified a low associated failure and complication rate, supporting fertiloscopy as a low-risk procedure.

Conclusion: Despite limitations, this study highlights spontaneous pregnancy outcomes and associated low complication and failure rates, emphasising fertiloscopy's role in managing infertility in Australia as a lower risk surgical alternative to standard laparoscopy.

受精镜及其在妇科医生武器库中的地位。
背景:不孕症是全球普遍存在的问题。目前对女性盆腔不孕症的检查使用的是经腹腹腔镜,这使患者面临相关风险。另一种方法是受精镜检查,包括宫腔镜检查、输卵管染色检查和经阴道水电解质镜检查(TVHL),属于更广泛的 VNOTES 类别。本研究回顾了澳大利亚的受精镜检查病例,以评估其在不孕症治疗中的作用:对76例病例进行了回顾性分析,回顾了成像结果、受精镜检查结果和干预措施以及生育结果。统计分析通过R Studio v4.1进行,描述性数据采用均值和平均数,连续变量的差异采用Kruskal-Wallis方差分析检验。构建卡普兰-梅耶曲线来描述累积妊娠发生率,并使用对数秩检验来评估差异。统计检验采用双尾法,P 值为 结果:在 76 例病例中,70 例接受了受精镜检查,35 例接受了术中干预。其中 53 例受孕,18 例自然受孕。到第 283 天,自然受孕的几率最高,为 44%。受精镜检查失败率为 5.3%,并发症发生率为 1.3%:讨论:到第283天时,受精镜检查后自然受孕的几率最高,为44%,这可能与受精镜检查和转诊到生殖治疗之间的时间有关。本研究发现,相关的失败率和并发症发生率较低,支持受精镜检查为低风险手术:尽管存在局限性,但这项研究强调了自然怀孕的结果以及相关的低并发症和失败率,强调了受精镜作为标准腹腔镜手术的低风险手术替代方案在澳大利亚不孕症治疗中的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
11.80%
发文量
165
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (ANZJOG) is an editorially independent publication owned by the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RANZCOG) and the RANZCOG Research foundation. ANZJOG aims to provide a medium for the publication of original contributions to clinical practice and/or research in all fields of obstetrics and gynaecology and related disciplines. Articles are peer reviewed by clinicians or researchers expert in the field of the submitted work. From time to time the journal will also publish printed abstracts from the RANZCOG Annual Scientific Meeting and meetings of relevant special interest groups, where the accepted abstracts have undergone the journals peer review acceptance process.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信