Population-level impact of switching to 1-dose human papillomavirus vaccination in high-income countries: examining uncertainties using mathematical modeling.

Marc Brisson, Jean-François Laprise, Mélanie Drolet, Éléonore Chamberland, Élodie Bénard, Emily A Burger, Mark Jit, Jane J Kim, Lauri E Markowitz, Chantal Sauvageau, Stephen Sy
{"title":"Population-level impact of switching to 1-dose human papillomavirus vaccination in high-income countries: examining uncertainties using mathematical modeling.","authors":"Marc Brisson, Jean-François Laprise, Mélanie Drolet, Éléonore Chamberland, Élodie Bénard, Emily A Burger, Mark Jit, Jane J Kim, Lauri E Markowitz, Chantal Sauvageau, Stephen Sy","doi":"10.1093/jncimonographs/lgae038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A concern in high-income countries is that switching to 1-dose human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination could cause a rebound in HPV infection and cervical cancer if 1-dose efficacy or duration were inferior to 2 doses. Using mathematical modeling and up-to-date trial-based data, we projected the population-level effectiveness of switching from 2-dose to 1-dose vaccination under different vaccine efficacy and duration assumptions in high-income countries.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used HPV-ADVISE (Agent-based Dynamic model for VaccInation and Screening Evaluation), a transmission-dynamic model of HPV infection and cervical cancer, varying key model assumptions to identify those with the greatest impact on projections of HPV-16 and cervical cancer incidence over time: 1) 1-dose vaccine efficacy and vaccine duration, 2) mechanisms of vaccine efficacy and duration over time, 3) midadult (>30 years of age) sexual behavior, 4) progression to cervical cancer among midadults, and 5) vaccination coverage and programs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In high-income countries, 1-dose vaccination would cause no appreciable rebound in HPV-16 infection, except for a limited rebound under the most pessimistic assumptions of vaccine duration (average, 25 years), because 1) the switch would occur when HPV prevalence is low because of high 2-dose vaccination coverage and 2) individuals would be protected during their peak ages of sexual activity (<35 to 40 years of age). Our model projects a more limited rebound in cervical cancer because of a shift to older age at infection, resulting in fewer life-years left to potentially develop cancer. Projections were robust when varying key model assumptions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>High protection during peak ages of sexual activity in high-income countries would likely mitigate any potential rebounds in HPV infection and cervical cancer under the most pessimistic assumptions of 1-dose efficacy and duration.</p>","PeriodicalId":73988,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs","volume":"2024 67","pages":"387-399"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11555275/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jncimonographs/lgae038","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: A concern in high-income countries is that switching to 1-dose human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination could cause a rebound in HPV infection and cervical cancer if 1-dose efficacy or duration were inferior to 2 doses. Using mathematical modeling and up-to-date trial-based data, we projected the population-level effectiveness of switching from 2-dose to 1-dose vaccination under different vaccine efficacy and duration assumptions in high-income countries.

Methods: We used HPV-ADVISE (Agent-based Dynamic model for VaccInation and Screening Evaluation), a transmission-dynamic model of HPV infection and cervical cancer, varying key model assumptions to identify those with the greatest impact on projections of HPV-16 and cervical cancer incidence over time: 1) 1-dose vaccine efficacy and vaccine duration, 2) mechanisms of vaccine efficacy and duration over time, 3) midadult (>30 years of age) sexual behavior, 4) progression to cervical cancer among midadults, and 5) vaccination coverage and programs.

Results: In high-income countries, 1-dose vaccination would cause no appreciable rebound in HPV-16 infection, except for a limited rebound under the most pessimistic assumptions of vaccine duration (average, 25 years), because 1) the switch would occur when HPV prevalence is low because of high 2-dose vaccination coverage and 2) individuals would be protected during their peak ages of sexual activity (<35 to 40 years of age). Our model projects a more limited rebound in cervical cancer because of a shift to older age at infection, resulting in fewer life-years left to potentially develop cancer. Projections were robust when varying key model assumptions.

Conclusions: High protection during peak ages of sexual activity in high-income countries would likely mitigate any potential rebounds in HPV infection and cervical cancer under the most pessimistic assumptions of 1-dose efficacy and duration.

高收入国家改用 1 剂人类乳头瘤病毒疫苗接种对人口的影响:利用数学建模研究不确定性。
背景:高收入国家担心的一个问题是,如果接种1剂人类乳头瘤病毒(HPV)疫苗的效力或持续时间不如2剂疫苗,那么改用1剂疫苗接种可能会导致HPV感染和宫颈癌反弹。我们利用数学模型和基于试验的最新数据,预测了在不同疫苗效力和持续时间假设下,高收入国家从接种 2 剂疫苗改为接种 1 剂疫苗的人群有效性:我们使用了 HPV-ADVISE(基于代理的疫苗接种和筛查评估动态模型),这是一个关于 HPV 感染和宫颈癌的传播动态模型,我们改变了模型的主要假设,以确定那些对 HPV-16 和宫颈癌发病率的预测影响最大的假设:1) 1 剂疫苗的效力和疫苗持续时间;2) 疫苗效力和持续时间随时间变化的机制;3) 中年人(大于 30 岁)的性行为;4) 中年人患宫颈癌的进展;5) 疫苗接种覆盖率和接种计划。结果:在高收入国家,1剂疫苗接种不会导致HPV-16感染明显反弹,除了在最悲观的疫苗接种时间假设下(平均25年)会出现有限的反弹,这是因为:1)由于2剂疫苗接种覆盖率高,转换将发生在HPV流行率较低的时候;2)个人将在性活动高峰年龄段受到保护(结论:在性活动高峰年龄段受到高保护):在高收入国家,性活动高峰年龄段的高保护率很可能会减轻 HPV 感染和宫颈癌的潜在反弹,这是在最悲观的 1 剂疫苗效力和持续时间假设下得出的结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信