Leveraging single-dose human papillomavirus vaccination dose-efficiency to attain cervical cancer elimination in resource-constrained settings.

Irene Man, Damien Georges, Partha Basu, Iacopo Baussano
{"title":"Leveraging single-dose human papillomavirus vaccination dose-efficiency to attain cervical cancer elimination in resource-constrained settings.","authors":"Irene Man, Damien Georges, Partha Basu, Iacopo Baussano","doi":"10.1093/jncimonographs/lgae035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In low- and middle-income countries, resource constraints remain a critical factor limiting access to cervical cancer preventive measures. The option of single-dose immunization could help improve access to human papillomavirus vaccination and attain cervical cancer elimination.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>With simulation models adapted to country-specific data and scenarios for single-dose protection derived from International Agency for Research on Cancer India vaccine trial data, we estimated the expected impact of single-dose vaccination in India, Rwanda, and Brazil, three countries with varying profiles of cervical cancer risk and vaccination timelines. In combination with single-dose vaccination, we explored different resource reallocation strategies based on dose efficiency, elimination attainment, and cervical cancer cases prevented, with the existing 2-dose program as a comparator.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Assuming lifelong single-dose protection, switching from 2-dose to 1-dose vaccination and reallocating resources to female catch-up could prevent 467-1336, 94-194, and 15-207 additional cervical cancer cases (per 100 000 women born) in cohorts aged 11-30 years in India, Rwanda, and Brazil, respectively. Resource reallocation to improve the current routine coverage could help eliminate cervical cancer in India and across all Brazilian states but not in Rwanda. For each country, we found a dose-efficient reallocation strategy (or a combination of strategies) together with 1-dose vaccination that could prevent more cervical cancers vs 2-dose vaccination, even in the worst-case scenario of single-dose protection.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Adopting single-dose vaccination with resource reallocation is a resource-efficient approach to enhance progress toward cervical cancer elimination. The overall impact of vaccination can be maximized by fine-tuning resource reallocation to a country's needs.</p>","PeriodicalId":73988,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs","volume":"2024 67","pages":"400-409"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11555267/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jncimonographs/lgae035","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In low- and middle-income countries, resource constraints remain a critical factor limiting access to cervical cancer preventive measures. The option of single-dose immunization could help improve access to human papillomavirus vaccination and attain cervical cancer elimination.

Methods: With simulation models adapted to country-specific data and scenarios for single-dose protection derived from International Agency for Research on Cancer India vaccine trial data, we estimated the expected impact of single-dose vaccination in India, Rwanda, and Brazil, three countries with varying profiles of cervical cancer risk and vaccination timelines. In combination with single-dose vaccination, we explored different resource reallocation strategies based on dose efficiency, elimination attainment, and cervical cancer cases prevented, with the existing 2-dose program as a comparator.

Results: Assuming lifelong single-dose protection, switching from 2-dose to 1-dose vaccination and reallocating resources to female catch-up could prevent 467-1336, 94-194, and 15-207 additional cervical cancer cases (per 100 000 women born) in cohorts aged 11-30 years in India, Rwanda, and Brazil, respectively. Resource reallocation to improve the current routine coverage could help eliminate cervical cancer in India and across all Brazilian states but not in Rwanda. For each country, we found a dose-efficient reallocation strategy (or a combination of strategies) together with 1-dose vaccination that could prevent more cervical cancers vs 2-dose vaccination, even in the worst-case scenario of single-dose protection.

Conclusion: Adopting single-dose vaccination with resource reallocation is a resource-efficient approach to enhance progress toward cervical cancer elimination. The overall impact of vaccination can be maximized by fine-tuning resource reallocation to a country's needs.

利用单剂量人类乳头瘤病毒疫苗接种的剂量效率,在资源有限的环境中消除宫颈癌。
背景:在中低收入国家,资源限制仍是制约宫颈癌预防措施普及的关键因素。选择单剂量免疫接种有助于改善人类乳头状瘤病毒疫苗接种的可及性,并实现消除宫颈癌的目标:方法:我们利用根据特定国家数据调整的模拟模型以及从国际癌症研究机构印度疫苗试验数据中得出的单剂量保护方案,估算了单剂量疫苗接种在印度、卢旺达和巴西这三个宫颈癌风险和疫苗接种时间各不相同的国家的预期影响。结合单剂疫苗接种,我们探讨了基于剂量效率、消除率和宫颈癌病例预防率的不同资源再分配策略,并以现有的两剂疫苗接种计划作为比较对象:假设单剂疫苗可提供终身保护,那么在印度、卢旺达和巴西,将两剂疫苗改为单剂疫苗接种,并将资源重新分配给女性补种,可在 11-30 岁的人群中分别多预防 467-1336 例、94-194 例和 15-207 例宫颈癌病例(每 10 万名出生女性)。重新分配资源以改善目前的常规覆盖率有助于消除印度和巴西所有各州的宫颈癌,但对卢旺达却没有帮助。在每个国家,我们都发现了一种剂量有效的重新分配策略(或策略组合),与单剂疫苗接种相比,即使在单剂疫苗保护的最坏情况下,单剂疫苗接种也能预防更多的宫颈癌:结论:采用单剂疫苗接种并重新分配资源是一种资源节约型方法,可促进消除宫颈癌的进展。根据一个国家的需求对资源重新分配进行微调,可以最大限度地提高疫苗接种的整体效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信