There Is No Difference in Clinical Outcomes Between Early or Late Weight-Bearing After Autologous Osteochondral Transplantation for Osteochondral Lesion of the Talus: A Systematic Review.
Choon Chiet Hong, Chen Xi Kasia Chua, Brjan Kaiji Betzler, Sheng Yang Lim, Si Heng Sharon Tan, Christopher Jon Pearce
{"title":"There Is No Difference in Clinical Outcomes Between Early or Late Weight-Bearing After Autologous Osteochondral Transplantation for Osteochondral Lesion of the Talus: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Choon Chiet Hong, Chen Xi Kasia Chua, Brjan Kaiji Betzler, Sheng Yang Lim, Si Heng Sharon Tan, Christopher Jon Pearce","doi":"10.1016/j.arthro.2024.10.045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To provide a comprehensive systematic review to determine the impact of early weight-bearing compared with late weight-bearing on the clinical outcomes of patients who underwent osteochondral lesion of the talus (OLT) and were treated with autologous osteochondral transplantation (AOT) and to review the rate of return to sports and/or activities, patient satisfaction, and complications.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review of the PubMed, Embase, and The Cochrane Library databases was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systemic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Publications were divided into group A, in which patients were allowed early weight-bearing within the first 6 weeks, whereas group B consisted of patients who were only allowed weight-bearing after 6 weeks. Unweighted estimates were calculated instead of quantitative random-effects meta-analysis due to the high heterogeneity and low level of evidence of the included studies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 44 studies with 1,838 ankles were included. There were 25 studies in group A and 19 studies in group B. Both the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society and visual analog scale scores were not affected by early weight-bearing after AOT for OLT. There were similar rates of return to sports and/or activities (71.4%-100% vs 71.4%-100%) and patient satisfaction (71.4%-100% vs 65.7%-100%). Notably, late weight-bearers had lower rates of postoperative knee symptoms (0-30% vs 0-39.1%) despite more late weight-bearers presenting with complication rates >20% compared with early weight-bearers (20% vs 14.3%) respectively. Late weight-bearers also had greater rates of repeat surgery (0-26% vs 0-18.2%) compared with early weight-bearers, with the most common cause for repeat surgery being arthroscopic debridement for postoperative impingement pain.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Protocols allowing for early weight-bearing after AOT for OLT yielded similarly good outcomes in terms of American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society, visual analog scale for pain score, return to sports and/or daily activities, and patient satisfaction when compared with late weight-bearing. Although the differences in ranges for postoperative complications were not exceedingly different, late weight-bearers have slightly lower rates of postoperative knee symptoms and marginally greater rates of repeat surgery, with the most common cause for repeat surgery being arthroscopic debridement for postoperative impingement pain, similar to the studies with a low level of evidence appraised. The strength of these conclusions is limited because of the high level of heterogeneity, low level of evidence and high risk of bias in the literature reviewed.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level IV, systematic review of Level I to Level IV studies with predominantly Level IV studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":55459,"journal":{"name":"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2024.10.045","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: To provide a comprehensive systematic review to determine the impact of early weight-bearing compared with late weight-bearing on the clinical outcomes of patients who underwent osteochondral lesion of the talus (OLT) and were treated with autologous osteochondral transplantation (AOT) and to review the rate of return to sports and/or activities, patient satisfaction, and complications.
Methods: A systematic review of the PubMed, Embase, and The Cochrane Library databases was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systemic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Publications were divided into group A, in which patients were allowed early weight-bearing within the first 6 weeks, whereas group B consisted of patients who were only allowed weight-bearing after 6 weeks. Unweighted estimates were calculated instead of quantitative random-effects meta-analysis due to the high heterogeneity and low level of evidence of the included studies.
Results: In total, 44 studies with 1,838 ankles were included. There were 25 studies in group A and 19 studies in group B. Both the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society and visual analog scale scores were not affected by early weight-bearing after AOT for OLT. There were similar rates of return to sports and/or activities (71.4%-100% vs 71.4%-100%) and patient satisfaction (71.4%-100% vs 65.7%-100%). Notably, late weight-bearers had lower rates of postoperative knee symptoms (0-30% vs 0-39.1%) despite more late weight-bearers presenting with complication rates >20% compared with early weight-bearers (20% vs 14.3%) respectively. Late weight-bearers also had greater rates of repeat surgery (0-26% vs 0-18.2%) compared with early weight-bearers, with the most common cause for repeat surgery being arthroscopic debridement for postoperative impingement pain.
Conclusions: Protocols allowing for early weight-bearing after AOT for OLT yielded similarly good outcomes in terms of American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society, visual analog scale for pain score, return to sports and/or daily activities, and patient satisfaction when compared with late weight-bearing. Although the differences in ranges for postoperative complications were not exceedingly different, late weight-bearers have slightly lower rates of postoperative knee symptoms and marginally greater rates of repeat surgery, with the most common cause for repeat surgery being arthroscopic debridement for postoperative impingement pain, similar to the studies with a low level of evidence appraised. The strength of these conclusions is limited because of the high level of heterogeneity, low level of evidence and high risk of bias in the literature reviewed.
Level of evidence: Level IV, systematic review of Level I to Level IV studies with predominantly Level IV studies.
目的:我们旨在提供一项全面的系统性综述,以确定与晚期负重相比,早期负重对接受 AOT 治疗的 OLT 患者临床疗效的影响,其次审查恢复运动和/或活动的比率、患者满意度和并发症:根据 PRISMA 指南,对 PubMed、Embase 和 Cochrane 图书馆数据库进行了系统性回顾。文章分为A组和B组,A组患者可在6周内早期负重,而B组患者只能在6周后负重。由于纳入研究的异质性较高且证据水平较低,因此计算了非加权估计值,而非定量随机效应荟萃分析:结果:共纳入 44 项研究,涉及 1838 个脚踝。A组有25项研究,B组有19项研究。AOFAS和VAS评分均未受到AOT治疗OLT后早期负重的影响。恢复运动和/或活动的比率(71.4-100% vs 71.4-100%)和患者满意度(71.4-100% vs 65.7-100%)相似。值得注意的是,晚期负重者的术后膝关节症状发生率较低(0-30% vs 0-39.1%),尽管与早期负重者(20% vs 14.3%)相比,晚期负重者的并发症发生率高于20%。与早期负重者相比,晚期负重者的重复手术率也更高(0-26% vs 0-18.2%),最常见的重复手术原因是因术后撞击痛而进行关节镜清创:结论:与晚期负重相比,AOT治疗OLT后允许早期负重的方案在AOFAS、疼痛VAS、恢复运动和/或日常活动以及患者满意度方面都取得了类似的良好效果。虽然术后并发症的范围差异不大,但晚期负重者的术后膝关节症状发生率略低,重复手术率略高,最常见的重复手术原因是术后撞击痛的关节镜清创,这与低水平证据评估的研究结果类似。由于综述文献的异质性高、证据级别低和ROB高,这些结论的力度有限:证据级别:IV级,对I级至IV级研究的系统综述,以IV级研究为主。
期刊介绍:
Nowhere is minimally invasive surgery explained better than in Arthroscopy, the leading peer-reviewed journal in the field. Every issue enables you to put into perspective the usefulness of the various emerging arthroscopic techniques. The advantages and disadvantages of these methods -- along with their applications in various situations -- are discussed in relation to their efficiency, efficacy and cost benefit. As a special incentive, paid subscribers also receive access to the journal expanded website.