Zolpidem for the Management of Catatonia: A Systematic Review.

IF 2.7 4区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Matthew Gunther, Nathan Tran, Shixie Jiang
{"title":"Zolpidem for the Management of Catatonia: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Matthew Gunther, Nathan Tran, Shixie Jiang","doi":"10.1016/j.jaclp.2024.10.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Catatonia is a psychomotor syndrome associated with neurotransmitter disturbances, common in both psychiatric and medical settings. Hypoactivity of the GABA<sub>A</sub> receptor is one of the predominant theories behind the pathophysiology of catatonia, affecting both motor functioning and emotional regulation. Benzodiazepines such as lorazepam are considered the first-line treatment for catatonia. However, up to 27% of catatonia cases fail to respond to benzodiazepines alone. Zolpidem, which can be used as a challenge, monotherapy, or augmentation agent, serves as a promising pharmacological agent for catatonia due to its unique pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic profile.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We sought to systematically examine the evidence behind zolpidem's use among adult patients to understand its clinical utility in the management of catatonia against prevailing treatments such as lorazepam and electroconvulsive therapy (ECT).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a systematic review using search terms related to zolpidem and catatonia in PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science. We followed PRISMA guidelines and identified 29 studies, including case studies and case series, that met inclusion criteria.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We reviewed 35 cases in which zolpidem was used for catatonia management (age: M =51.5 ± 21.0 SD years; 68.6% female; Bush Francis Catatonia Rating Scale: M=22.2 ± 9.0 SD). Proportions of positive responses for zolpidem on catatonia varied by treatment approach: 91% as a challenge agent (n=10), 100% as a first-line monotherapy agent (n=3), 57% as a first-line combination therapy agent (n=4), 70% as a second-line monotherapy agent (n=7), and 100% as a second-line augmentation agent (n=4). In total, 28 out of the 35 reported cases of catatonia (80%) responded positively to zolpidem.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>An 80% positive response rate for zolpidem in lysing catatonia is encouraging but may be an overestimate due to reporting bias of case level data. Results may be explained by zolpidem's selectivity for the α<sub>1</sub> subunit of the GABA<sub>A</sub> receptor. Thus, zolpidem may be an under-utilized catatonia treatment and prove useful in situations when benzodiazepines fail or when ECT access is limited. Given that current literature on the use of zolpidem for catatonia is limited to case reports, more robust research in this area is warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":52388,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Academy of Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Academy of Consultation-Liaison Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaclp.2024.10.004","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Catatonia is a psychomotor syndrome associated with neurotransmitter disturbances, common in both psychiatric and medical settings. Hypoactivity of the GABAA receptor is one of the predominant theories behind the pathophysiology of catatonia, affecting both motor functioning and emotional regulation. Benzodiazepines such as lorazepam are considered the first-line treatment for catatonia. However, up to 27% of catatonia cases fail to respond to benzodiazepines alone. Zolpidem, which can be used as a challenge, monotherapy, or augmentation agent, serves as a promising pharmacological agent for catatonia due to its unique pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic profile.

Objective: We sought to systematically examine the evidence behind zolpidem's use among adult patients to understand its clinical utility in the management of catatonia against prevailing treatments such as lorazepam and electroconvulsive therapy (ECT).

Methods: We conducted a systematic review using search terms related to zolpidem and catatonia in PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science. We followed PRISMA guidelines and identified 29 studies, including case studies and case series, that met inclusion criteria.

Results: We reviewed 35 cases in which zolpidem was used for catatonia management (age: M =51.5 ± 21.0 SD years; 68.6% female; Bush Francis Catatonia Rating Scale: M=22.2 ± 9.0 SD). Proportions of positive responses for zolpidem on catatonia varied by treatment approach: 91% as a challenge agent (n=10), 100% as a first-line monotherapy agent (n=3), 57% as a first-line combination therapy agent (n=4), 70% as a second-line monotherapy agent (n=7), and 100% as a second-line augmentation agent (n=4). In total, 28 out of the 35 reported cases of catatonia (80%) responded positively to zolpidem.

Conclusions: An 80% positive response rate for zolpidem in lysing catatonia is encouraging but may be an overestimate due to reporting bias of case level data. Results may be explained by zolpidem's selectivity for the α1 subunit of the GABAA receptor. Thus, zolpidem may be an under-utilized catatonia treatment and prove useful in situations when benzodiazepines fail or when ECT access is limited. Given that current literature on the use of zolpidem for catatonia is limited to case reports, more robust research in this area is warranted.

唑吡坦用于治疗卡他性精神障碍:系统综述。
背景:紧张症是一种与神经递质紊乱有关的精神运动综合征,在精神病和医疗环境中都很常见。GABAA 受体功能减退是紧张症病理生理学的主要理论之一,它会影响运动功能和情绪调节。劳拉西泮等苯二氮卓类药物被认为是紧张症的一线治疗药物。然而,高达 27% 的紧张性精神障碍患者对苯二氮卓类药物无效。唑吡坦可作为挑战药、单药或增效药使用,由于其独特的药效学和药代动力学特征,唑吡坦有望成为治疗紧张性精神障碍的一种药理药剂:我们试图系统研究唑吡坦在成年患者中使用的证据,以了解其在治疗紧张症方面的临床效用,并与劳拉西泮和电休克疗法(ECT)等主流疗法进行对比:我们使用 PubMed、EMBASE 和 Web of Science 中与唑吡坦和紧张症相关的检索词进行了系统性综述。我们遵循 PRISMA 指南,确定了 29 项符合纳入标准的研究,包括病例研究和系列病例:我们回顾了 35 例使用唑吡坦治疗紧张症的病例(年龄:男 =51.5 ± 21.0 SD 岁;68.6% 为女性;布什-弗朗西斯紧张症评定量表:男 =22.2 ± 9.0 SD 岁;68.6% 为女性):M=22.2±9.0SD)。唑吡坦对紧张症的阳性反应比例因治疗方法而异:91%作为挑战药物(10 人),100%作为一线单药治疗药物(3 人),57%作为一线联合治疗药物(4 人),70%作为二线单药治疗药物(7 人),100%作为二线增强药物(4 人)。在报告的35例紧张性精神分裂症病例中,共有28例(80%)对唑吡坦有阳性反应:结论:唑吡坦对失张力症的阳性反应率为 80%,这一结果令人鼓舞,但由于病例数据的报告偏差,这一结果可能被高估了。唑吡坦对 GABAA 受体的 α1 亚基具有选择性,这或许可以解释这一结果。因此,唑吡坦可能是一种未被充分利用的紧张症治疗方法,在苯二氮卓类药物失效或电痉挛疗法使用受限的情况下,唑吡坦可能会被证明是有用的。鉴于目前关于使用唑吡坦治疗紧张症的文献仅限于病例报告,因此有必要在这一领域开展更深入的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
13.00%
发文量
378
审稿时长
50 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信