NHS action on social and economic development in England: Vague national policy expectations

IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Phoebe Dunn, Lucinda Allen, Luisa Buzelli, Leo Ewbank, Hugh Alderwick
{"title":"NHS action on social and economic development in England: Vague national policy expectations","authors":"Phoebe Dunn,&nbsp;Lucinda Allen,&nbsp;Luisa Buzelli,&nbsp;Leo Ewbank,&nbsp;Hugh Alderwick","doi":"10.1016/j.healthpol.2024.105194","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Under recent reforms to the National Health Service (NHS) in England, NHS organizations have been given new objectives to contribute to social and economic development. Health systems in other high-income countries are pursuing related approaches. This paper analyses national policy documents to understand the framing of the NHS's new policy priorities on social and economic development. We focus on the role of NHS integrated care systems—area-based planning bodies responsible for managing NHS resources and coordinating local services. National policy is vague about what social and economic development means in practice. There is limited guidance on which approaches local organizations should prioritize, and which organisations are responsible for implementation. Greater clarity from national policymakers and an overarching framework to guide local action is needed to reduce the risk of inaction, poorly targeted interventions, and missed opportunities for learning and evaluation. Policymakers and health system leaders also need to be realistic about the limits of local action given the importance of national public policy choices in shaping the social determinants of health. Coordinated policy action and investment across government is needed to address underlying social and economic conditions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55067,"journal":{"name":"Health Policy","volume":"151 ","pages":"Article 105194"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168851024002045","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Under recent reforms to the National Health Service (NHS) in England, NHS organizations have been given new objectives to contribute to social and economic development. Health systems in other high-income countries are pursuing related approaches. This paper analyses national policy documents to understand the framing of the NHS's new policy priorities on social and economic development. We focus on the role of NHS integrated care systems—area-based planning bodies responsible for managing NHS resources and coordinating local services. National policy is vague about what social and economic development means in practice. There is limited guidance on which approaches local organizations should prioritize, and which organisations are responsible for implementation. Greater clarity from national policymakers and an overarching framework to guide local action is needed to reduce the risk of inaction, poorly targeted interventions, and missed opportunities for learning and evaluation. Policymakers and health system leaders also need to be realistic about the limits of local action given the importance of national public policy choices in shaping the social determinants of health. Coordinated policy action and investment across government is needed to address underlying social and economic conditions.
英国国家医疗服务体系在社会和经济发展方面的行动:模糊的国家政策期望。
根据英格兰国家医疗服务系统(NHS)最近的改革,NHS 组织被赋予了新的目标,即为社会和经济发展做出贡献。其他高收入国家的卫生系统也在采取相关措施。本文分析了国家政策文件,以了解英国国家医疗服务体系在社会和经济发展方面的新政策重点框架。我们将重点放在国家医疗服务体系综合医疗系统的作用上--该系统是以地区为基础的规划机构,负责管理国家医疗服务体系的资源并协调当地服务。国家政策对于社会和经济发展的实际意义含糊不清。对于地方组织应优先考虑哪些方法,以及哪些组织负责实施,指导也很有限。需要国家政策制定者进一步明确,并制定指导地方行动的总体框架,以减少不作为、干预措施针对性不强以及错失学习和评估机会的风险。鉴于国家公共政策选择对健康的社会决定因素的影响非常重要,政策制定者和卫生系统领导者还需要现实地认识到地方行动的局限性。需要政府各部门协调政策行动和投资,以解决潜在的社会和经济问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Policy
Health Policy 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
6.10%
发文量
157
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Policy is intended to be a vehicle for the exploration and discussion of health policy and health system issues and is aimed in particular at enhancing communication between health policy and system researchers, legislators, decision-makers and professionals concerned with developing, implementing, and analysing health policy, health systems and health care reforms, primarily in high-income countries outside the U.S.A.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信