MINARO DRS: usability study of a robotic-assisted laminectomy.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q3 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Manuel Vossel, Lukas Theisgen, Noah Wickel, Lovis Phlippen, Rastislav Pjontek, Sergey Drobinsky, Hans Clusmann, Klaus Radermacher, Christian Blume, Matías de la Fuente
{"title":"MINARO DRS: usability study of a robotic-assisted laminectomy.","authors":"Manuel Vossel, Lukas Theisgen, Noah Wickel, Lovis Phlippen, Rastislav Pjontek, Sergey Drobinsky, Hans Clusmann, Klaus Radermacher, Christian Blume, Matías de la Fuente","doi":"10.1007/s11548-024-03285-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Although the literature shows that robotic assistance can support the surgeon, robotic systems are not widely spread in clinics. They often incorporate large robotic arms adopted from the manufacturing industry, imposing safety hazards when in contact with the patient or surgical staff. We approached this limitation with a modular dual robot consisting of an ultra-lightweight carrier robot for rough prepositioning and small, highly dynamic, application-specific, interchangeable tooling robots.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A formative usability study with N = 10 neurosurgeons was conducted using a prototype of a novel tooling robot for laminectomy to evaluate the system's usability. The participants were asked to perform three experiments using the robotic system: (1) prepositioning with the carrier robot and milling into (2) a block phantom as well as (3) a spine model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All neurosurgeons could perform a simulated laminectomy on a spine phantom using the robotic system. On average, they rated the usability of this first prototype already between good and excellent (SUS-Score above 75%). Eight out of the ten participants preferred robotic-assisted milling over manual milling. For prepositioning, the developed haptic guidance showed significantly higher effectiveness and efficiency than visual navigation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The proposed dual robot system showed the potential to increase safety in the operating room because of the synergistic hands-on control and the ultra-lightweight design of the carrier robot. The modular design allows for easy adaptation to various surgical procedures. However, improvements are needed in the ergonomics of the tooling robot and the complexity of the virtual fixtures. The cooperative dual robot system can subsequently be tested in a cadaver laboratory and in vivo on animals.</p>","PeriodicalId":51251,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-024-03285-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Although the literature shows that robotic assistance can support the surgeon, robotic systems are not widely spread in clinics. They often incorporate large robotic arms adopted from the manufacturing industry, imposing safety hazards when in contact with the patient or surgical staff. We approached this limitation with a modular dual robot consisting of an ultra-lightweight carrier robot for rough prepositioning and small, highly dynamic, application-specific, interchangeable tooling robots.

Methods: A formative usability study with N = 10 neurosurgeons was conducted using a prototype of a novel tooling robot for laminectomy to evaluate the system's usability. The participants were asked to perform three experiments using the robotic system: (1) prepositioning with the carrier robot and milling into (2) a block phantom as well as (3) a spine model.

Results: All neurosurgeons could perform a simulated laminectomy on a spine phantom using the robotic system. On average, they rated the usability of this first prototype already between good and excellent (SUS-Score above 75%). Eight out of the ten participants preferred robotic-assisted milling over manual milling. For prepositioning, the developed haptic guidance showed significantly higher effectiveness and efficiency than visual navigation.

Conclusion: The proposed dual robot system showed the potential to increase safety in the operating room because of the synergistic hands-on control and the ultra-lightweight design of the carrier robot. The modular design allows for easy adaptation to various surgical procedures. However, improvements are needed in the ergonomics of the tooling robot and the complexity of the virtual fixtures. The cooperative dual robot system can subsequently be tested in a cadaver laboratory and in vivo on animals.

MINARO DRS:机器人辅助椎板切除术的可用性研究。
目的:尽管文献显示机器人辅助可以为外科医生提供支持,但机器人系统在诊所中并未广泛普及。它们通常采用制造业的大型机械臂,在与病人或手术人员接触时存在安全隐患。我们采用了一种模块化双机器人来解决这一限制,该机器人由一个用于粗略预置的超轻型载体机器人和一个小型、高动态、针对特定应用的可互换工具机器人组成:方法:使用用于椎板切除术的新型工具机器人原型,对 N = 10 名神经外科医生进行了形成性可用性研究,以评估系统的可用性。参与者被要求使用机器人系统进行三项实验:(1) 使用载体机器人进行预定位,并铣入(2) 块状假体以及(3) 脊柱模型:结果:所有神经外科医生都能使用机器人系统在脊柱模型上进行模拟椎板切除术。平均而言,他们对第一台原型机的可用性评价在良好和优秀之间(SUS 评分超过 75%)。与手动铣削相比,10 位参与者中有 8 位更喜欢机器人辅助铣削。在预定位方面,所开发的触觉引导显示出明显高于视觉导航的效果和效率:结论:所提出的双机器人系统显示出提高手术室安全性的潜力,因为它具有协同手控功能和载体机器人的超轻设计。模块化设计便于适应各种外科手术。不过,还需要改进工具机器人的人体工学设计和虚拟夹具的复杂性。合作式双机器人系统随后可在尸体实验室和动物体内进行测试。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery
International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL-RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
243
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal for Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery (IJCARS) is a peer-reviewed journal that provides a platform for closing the gap between medical and technical disciplines, and encourages interdisciplinary research and development activities in an international environment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信