The Packed Epistaxis Patient: Risks of Rebleeding? A Pilot Study to Inform Outpatient Management of Packed Patients.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Emily Kent, Leo Gundle, Imogen Jones
{"title":"The Packed Epistaxis Patient: Risks of Rebleeding? A Pilot Study to Inform Outpatient Management of Packed Patients.","authors":"Emily Kent, Leo Gundle, Imogen Jones","doi":"10.1177/00034894241298101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Current common practice for patients with idiopathic epistaxis which requires nasal packing is to admit as an in-patient for overnight observation. Anecdotally, many patients do not re-bleed, so admissions may be unnecessary. Several factors have been suggested to be associated with an increased risk of re-bleeding, such as hypertension, anticoagulant use, and male gender. We set out to investigate these factors, to create a local guideline to identify patients who may be safe to discharge with a pack in situ.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We collected the data on the most recent admissions in our department, who each received a non-absorbable nasal pack for idiopathic epistaxis (n = 100). Data points included age, gender, anticoagulation status, and comorbidities.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data from 100 patients were audited. Of those, 13 were found to have re-bled through their packing (13%). Statistically significant predictors of re-bleed were as follows: Male sex (OR = 9.81, <i>P</i> = .048, 95% CI 1.02-94.11), aspirin use (OR = 8.11, <i>P</i> = .047, 95% CI = 1.03-63.79), hypertension (OR = 8.14, <i>P</i> = .040, 95% CI = 1.10-60.26), and age (OR = 0.93, <i>P</i> = .018 95% CI = 0.88-0.99).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Re-bleed in patients managed with non-absorbable packing for idiopathic epistaxis is uncommon. Risk factors may include male sex, hypertension, and aspirin use. ENT departments nationally may consider discharging patients' home with pack in situ, for removal as an outpatient, in the absence of these risk factors.</p>","PeriodicalId":50975,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Otology Rhinology and Laryngology","volume":" ","pages":"34894241298101"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Otology Rhinology and Laryngology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00034894241298101","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Current common practice for patients with idiopathic epistaxis which requires nasal packing is to admit as an in-patient for overnight observation. Anecdotally, many patients do not re-bleed, so admissions may be unnecessary. Several factors have been suggested to be associated with an increased risk of re-bleeding, such as hypertension, anticoagulant use, and male gender. We set out to investigate these factors, to create a local guideline to identify patients who may be safe to discharge with a pack in situ.

Methods: We collected the data on the most recent admissions in our department, who each received a non-absorbable nasal pack for idiopathic epistaxis (n = 100). Data points included age, gender, anticoagulation status, and comorbidities.

Results: Data from 100 patients were audited. Of those, 13 were found to have re-bled through their packing (13%). Statistically significant predictors of re-bleed were as follows: Male sex (OR = 9.81, P = .048, 95% CI 1.02-94.11), aspirin use (OR = 8.11, P = .047, 95% CI = 1.03-63.79), hypertension (OR = 8.14, P = .040, 95% CI = 1.10-60.26), and age (OR = 0.93, P = .018 95% CI = 0.88-0.99).

Conclusion: Re-bleed in patients managed with non-absorbable packing for idiopathic epistaxis is uncommon. Risk factors may include male sex, hypertension, and aspirin use. ENT departments nationally may consider discharging patients' home with pack in situ, for removal as an outpatient, in the absence of these risk factors.

包块性鼻衄患者:再出血的风险?一项试点研究,为门诊患者处理包块提供参考。
目的:对于需要进行鼻腔填塞的特发性鼻衄患者,目前的普遍做法是收治住院病人,进行过夜观察。据传闻,许多患者不会再出血,因此入院治疗可能是不必要的。有几个因素被认为与再出血风险增加有关,如高血压、使用抗凝剂和男性。我们着手对这些因素进行调查,以制定本地指南,确定哪些患者可以安全出院,并在原位放置出血包:我们收集了本部门最近入院的特发性鼻衄患者的数据,这些患者均接受了非吸收性鼻腔填塞术(n = 100)。数据点包括年龄、性别、抗凝状态和合并症:结果:对 100 名患者的数据进行了审核。结果:对 100 名患者的数据进行了审核,发现其中 13 名患者(13%)通过包装再次鼻衄。从统计学角度看,再次出血的重要预测因素如下:男性(OR = 9.81,P = .048,95% CI = 1.02-94.11)、使用阿司匹林(OR = 8.11,P = .047,95% CI = 1.03-63.79)、高血压(OR = 8.14,P = .040,95% CI = 1.10-60.26)和年龄(OR = 0.93,P = .018 95% CI = 0.88-0.99):结论:使用非吸收性填料治疗特发性鼻衄的患者再次出血的情况并不常见。风险因素可能包括男性、高血压和服用阿司匹林。如果没有这些风险因素,全国的耳鼻喉科部门可考虑让患者带着原位填料出院,在门诊时取出。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
7.10%
发文量
171
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Annals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology publishes original manuscripts of clinical and research importance in otolaryngology–head and neck medicine and surgery, otology, neurotology, bronchoesophagology, laryngology, rhinology, head and neck oncology and surgery, plastic and reconstructive surgery, pediatric otolaryngology, audiology, and speech pathology. In-depth studies (supplements), papers of historical interest, and reviews of computer software and applications in otolaryngology are also published, as well as imaging, pathology, and clinicopathology studies, book reviews, and letters to the editor. AOR is the official journal of the American Broncho-Esophagological Association.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信