Staff Observational Differences Between Depressive Disorders and Personality Disorders.

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Kaushadh Jayakody, Iain McKinnon, David Andrew Cousins
{"title":"Staff Observational Differences Between Depressive Disorders and Personality Disorders.","authors":"Kaushadh Jayakody, Iain McKinnon, David Andrew Cousins","doi":"10.1111/jpm.13134","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Distinguishing those with a personality disorder from those with major depressive disorder (MDD) can be challenging, but establishing the correct diagnosis can direct appropriate management.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To identify whether behavioural themes differ between those with personality disorders from those with MDD, and how those differences might relate to a clinical team's perception of diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>An observational study identifying all inpatients presenting with symptoms of depression. At discharge, patients (n = 60) underwent a structured diagnostic interview and were grouped according to diagnosis. Qualitative data was analysed to determine whether behavioural themes differed between those with MDD and those with a personality disorder (with or without MDD).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ward staff perceptions of diagnosis aligned in all cases of personality disorder, but they also attributed that diagnosis to 54% of patients who had only MDD. Several behavioural themes were evident in those with a personality disorder but not those with MDD. Many behavioural themes were observed in both groups, and it is likely these that drove differences in diagnostic views.</p><p><strong>Implications for practice: </strong>Certain behavioural themes may be determinants of the perception of diagnosis held by inpatient staff, and when present in acute episodes in MDD, may risk diagnostic misattribution.</p>","PeriodicalId":50076,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jpm.13134","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Distinguishing those with a personality disorder from those with major depressive disorder (MDD) can be challenging, but establishing the correct diagnosis can direct appropriate management.

Aim: To identify whether behavioural themes differ between those with personality disorders from those with MDD, and how those differences might relate to a clinical team's perception of diagnosis.

Method: An observational study identifying all inpatients presenting with symptoms of depression. At discharge, patients (n = 60) underwent a structured diagnostic interview and were grouped according to diagnosis. Qualitative data was analysed to determine whether behavioural themes differed between those with MDD and those with a personality disorder (with or without MDD).

Results: Ward staff perceptions of diagnosis aligned in all cases of personality disorder, but they also attributed that diagnosis to 54% of patients who had only MDD. Several behavioural themes were evident in those with a personality disorder but not those with MDD. Many behavioural themes were observed in both groups, and it is likely these that drove differences in diagnostic views.

Implications for practice: Certain behavioural themes may be determinants of the perception of diagnosis held by inpatient staff, and when present in acute episodes in MDD, may risk diagnostic misattribution.

抑郁障碍与人格障碍之间的员工观察差异。
导言:目的:确定人格障碍患者与重度抑郁障碍患者的行为主题是否存在差异,以及这些差异如何与临床团队的诊断观念相关联:方法:一项观察性研究,确定所有出现抑郁症状的住院患者。出院时,患者(n = 60)接受了结构化诊断访谈,并根据诊断结果进行分组。研究人员对定性数据进行了分析,以确定患有 MDD 的患者与患有人格障碍(伴有或不伴有 MDD)的患者之间的行为主题是否存在差异:病区工作人员对所有人格障碍病例的诊断看法一致,但他们也将这一诊断归因于 54% 仅患有 MDD 的患者。一些行为主题在患有人格障碍的病人身上很明显,但在患有 MDD 的病人身上却不明显。在两组患者中都观察到了许多行为主题,很可能是这些行为主题导致了诊断观点的不同:对实践的启示:某些行为主题可能决定了住院病人对诊断的看法,当出现在 MDD 急性发作期时,可能存在诊断错误的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
3.70%
发文量
75
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing is an international journal which publishes research and scholarly papers that advance the development of policy, practice, research and education in all aspects of mental health nursing. We publish rigorously conducted research, literature reviews, essays and debates, and consumer practitioner narratives; all of which add new knowledge and advance practice globally. All papers must have clear implications for mental health nursing either solely or part of multidisciplinary practice. Papers are welcomed which draw on single or multiple research and academic disciplines. We give space to practitioner and consumer perspectives and ensure research published in the journal can be understood by a wide audience. We encourage critical debate and exchange of ideas and therefore welcome letters to the editor and essays and debates in mental health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信