Patients' preferences for virtual outpatient consultations and health care professionals' assessment of suitability for their patients: A single-centre survey.

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Anders Nikolai Ørsted Schultz, Søs Honnens, Eithne Hayes Bauer, Kathrin Söderberg, Kristian Kidholm, Robin Christensen, Jan Dominik Kampmann, Anders Christiansen, Frans Brandt
{"title":"Patients' preferences for virtual outpatient consultations and health care professionals' assessment of suitability for their patients: A single-centre survey.","authors":"Anders Nikolai Ørsted Schultz, Søs Honnens, Eithne Hayes Bauer, Kathrin Söderberg, Kristian Kidholm, Robin Christensen, Jan Dominik Kampmann, Anders Christiansen, Frans Brandt","doi":"10.1177/1357633X241294125","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To explore patients' preferences regarding virtual consultations (via telephone or video) and to explore healthcare professionals' assessment of whether virtual consultations can maintain the same clinical quality as in-person consultations for outpatient care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional survey was conducted among patients with an in-person consultation at the outpatient clinic for internal medicine and among healthcare professionals who treated the patients. The prevalence of preference was determined using descriptive statistics based on cross-tabulated frequencies. Percentages are presented with 95% confidence intervals (95%CI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 218 patients (response rate 67%) completed the questionnaire; 79 patients (36%) preferred a virtual consultation (95%CI: 30%-43%); telephones were the most popular and preferred by 72 patients (33%; 95%CI: 27%-39%) followed by video preferred by 54 patients (25%; 95%CI: 19%-31%). Regarding contextual factors, male gender and previous experiences with telephone or video consultations were statistically significant predictors in favour of virtual consultations. Healthcare professionals estimated that 58 consultations (21%; 95%CI: 17%-26%) could have been conducted virtually with the same professional and clinical quality as the current in-person consultations.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Current practice does not fully align with patient preferences for virtual visits in internal medicine outpatient clinics. Patients should be given the choice of virtual consultations whenever they are deemed professionally and clinically possible to enhance patient autonomy and satisfaction, while being mindful of speciality-specific considerations.</p>","PeriodicalId":50024,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare","volume":" ","pages":"1357633X241294125"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1357633X241294125","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To explore patients' preferences regarding virtual consultations (via telephone or video) and to explore healthcare professionals' assessment of whether virtual consultations can maintain the same clinical quality as in-person consultations for outpatient care.

Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted among patients with an in-person consultation at the outpatient clinic for internal medicine and among healthcare professionals who treated the patients. The prevalence of preference was determined using descriptive statistics based on cross-tabulated frequencies. Percentages are presented with 95% confidence intervals (95%CI).

Results: In total, 218 patients (response rate 67%) completed the questionnaire; 79 patients (36%) preferred a virtual consultation (95%CI: 30%-43%); telephones were the most popular and preferred by 72 patients (33%; 95%CI: 27%-39%) followed by video preferred by 54 patients (25%; 95%CI: 19%-31%). Regarding contextual factors, male gender and previous experiences with telephone or video consultations were statistically significant predictors in favour of virtual consultations. Healthcare professionals estimated that 58 consultations (21%; 95%CI: 17%-26%) could have been conducted virtually with the same professional and clinical quality as the current in-person consultations.

Conclusions: Current practice does not fully align with patient preferences for virtual visits in internal medicine outpatient clinics. Patients should be given the choice of virtual consultations whenever they are deemed professionally and clinically possible to enhance patient autonomy and satisfaction, while being mindful of speciality-specific considerations.

患者对虚拟门诊的偏好以及医护人员对患者适用性的评估:单中心调查。
目的探讨患者对虚拟会诊(通过电话或视频)的偏好,并探讨医护人员对虚拟会诊是否能保持与面对面会诊相同临床质量的评估:方法: 我们对在内科门诊接受现场咨询的患者和为患者提供治疗的医护人员进行了横断面调查。使用基于交叉表频率的描述性统计来确定偏好的流行程度。结果:共有 218 名患者(回复率为 67%)填写了问卷;79 名患者(36%)倾向于虚拟会诊(95%CI:30%-43%);72 名患者(33%;95%CI:27%-39%)最喜欢使用电话会诊,其次是 54 名患者(25%;95%CI:19%-31%)喜欢使用视频会诊。在背景因素方面,男性性别和以前的电话或视频会诊经历在统计学上对虚拟会诊的支持率有显著的预测作用。据医护人员估计,有 58 次会诊(21%;95%CI:17%-26%)可以通过虚拟方式进行,其专业和临床质量与目前的面对面会诊相同:目前的做法并不完全符合患者对内科门诊虚拟就诊的偏好。只要在专业和临床上认为可行,就应让患者选择虚拟会诊,以提高患者的自主性和满意度,同时注意特殊专业的考虑因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
14.10
自引率
10.60%
发文量
174
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare provides excellent peer reviewed coverage of developments in telemedicine and e-health and is now widely recognised as the leading journal in its field. Contributions from around the world provide a unique perspective on how different countries and health systems are using new technology in health care. Sections within the journal include technology updates, editorials, original articles, research tutorials, educational material, review articles and reports from various telemedicine organisations. A subscription to this journal will help you to stay up-to-date in this fast moving and growing area of medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信