Management of COVID-19 in the community using virtual care: An Australian perspective.

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Phillip F Yang, Belinda R Errington, Jenna Bartyn, Rong Liu, Kendall J Bein, Owen R Hutchings, Rebecca A Davis
{"title":"Management of COVID-19 in the community using virtual care: An Australian perspective.","authors":"Phillip F Yang, Belinda R Errington, Jenna Bartyn, Rong Liu, Kendall J Bein, Owen R Hutchings, Rebecca A Davis","doi":"10.1177/1357633X241292236","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Virtual care and remote monitoring were widely used during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, early evaluations of effectiveness were often inconclusive due to low rates of enrolment and limited data. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of virtual care in managing individuals in community-based self-isolation and quarantine in Australia during this pandemic.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted of individuals admitted to a virtual hospital in Sydney who either tested positive for COVID-19 and required self-isolation, or tested negative but still needed to self-isolate, amidst the Delta wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. Outcome measures included health service utilisation, in-hospital mortality, patient-reported experience measures (PREM), and cost savings resulting from avoided emergency department (ED) presentations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 9571 individuals admitted, 8544 (89.3%) had COVID-19. Clinical deterioration or acute illness occurred in 2477 (25.9%) individuals, of whom 890 (9.3%) were referred to ED for further assessment or investigation, and 614 (6.4%) were admitted for inpatient treatment. Overall mortality was 0.2%. Out of 1020 individuals who completed the PREM survey, 846 (82.9%) rated the overall virtual care experience as 'good' or 'very good'. Avoided ED presentations possibly resulted in cost savings estimated between AU$691,214 and AU$2,994,540.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Virtual care was successfully used to manage a large number of individuals in community-based self-isolation and quarantine during the COVID-19 pandemic. Scalable pathways for triage, monitoring and clinical escalation via telehealth ensured patient safety and acceptability, and alleviated strain on the broader health system.</p>","PeriodicalId":50024,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare","volume":" ","pages":"1357633X241292236"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1357633X241292236","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Virtual care and remote monitoring were widely used during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, early evaluations of effectiveness were often inconclusive due to low rates of enrolment and limited data. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of virtual care in managing individuals in community-based self-isolation and quarantine in Australia during this pandemic.

Methods: A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted of individuals admitted to a virtual hospital in Sydney who either tested positive for COVID-19 and required self-isolation, or tested negative but still needed to self-isolate, amidst the Delta wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. Outcome measures included health service utilisation, in-hospital mortality, patient-reported experience measures (PREM), and cost savings resulting from avoided emergency department (ED) presentations.

Results: Out of 9571 individuals admitted, 8544 (89.3%) had COVID-19. Clinical deterioration or acute illness occurred in 2477 (25.9%) individuals, of whom 890 (9.3%) were referred to ED for further assessment or investigation, and 614 (6.4%) were admitted for inpatient treatment. Overall mortality was 0.2%. Out of 1020 individuals who completed the PREM survey, 846 (82.9%) rated the overall virtual care experience as 'good' or 'very good'. Avoided ED presentations possibly resulted in cost savings estimated between AU$691,214 and AU$2,994,540.

Conclusion: Virtual care was successfully used to manage a large number of individuals in community-based self-isolation and quarantine during the COVID-19 pandemic. Scalable pathways for triage, monitoring and clinical escalation via telehealth ensured patient safety and acceptability, and alleviated strain on the broader health system.

在社区利用虚拟护理管理 COVID-19:澳大利亚的视角。
介绍:在 COVID-19 大流行期间,虚拟护理和远程监控得到了广泛应用。然而,由于登记率低和数据有限,早期的效果评估往往没有定论。本研究旨在评估澳大利亚大流行期间虚拟护理在管理社区自我隔离和检疫人员方面的有效性:方法:在 COVID-19 大流行的三角洲浪潮中,对悉尼一家虚拟医院收治的 COVID-19 检测呈阳性并需要自我隔离或检测呈阴性但仍需自我隔离的患者进行了一项回顾性横断面研究。结果测量包括医疗服务利用率、院内死亡率、患者报告体验测量(PREM)以及因避免急诊科就诊而节省的成本:在 9571 名住院患者中,8544 人(89.3%)患有 COVID-19。2477人(25.9%)出现临床恶化或急性病,其中890人(9.3%)被转至急诊科接受进一步评估或检查,614人(6.4%)接受住院治疗。总体死亡率为 0.2%。在完成 PREM 调查的 1020 人中,846 人(82.9%)将整体虚拟医疗体验评为 "好 "或 "非常好"。由于避免了急诊室就诊,估计可节省成本 691,214 澳元至 2,994,540 澳元:在 COVID-19 大流行期间,虚拟医疗被成功用于管理社区自我隔离和检疫中的大量人员。通过远程医疗进行分流、监测和临床升级的可扩展路径确保了患者的安全和可接受性,并减轻了更广泛的医疗系统的压力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
14.10
自引率
10.60%
发文量
174
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare provides excellent peer reviewed coverage of developments in telemedicine and e-health and is now widely recognised as the leading journal in its field. Contributions from around the world provide a unique perspective on how different countries and health systems are using new technology in health care. Sections within the journal include technology updates, editorials, original articles, research tutorials, educational material, review articles and reports from various telemedicine organisations. A subscription to this journal will help you to stay up-to-date in this fast moving and growing area of medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信