The effects of pretreatment oral hydration on extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy outcomes: A randomized controlled trial.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Phornphen Prasanchaimontri, Patcharin Somboon
{"title":"The effects of pretreatment oral hydration on extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy outcomes: A randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Phornphen Prasanchaimontri, Patcharin Somboon","doi":"10.5489/cuaj.8877","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>We sought to investigate the effects of pretreatment oral hydration on the outcomes of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients who undergoing ESWL for a single radio-opaque renal or proximal ureteric calculus ≤2 cm in size were randomized into two groups. The oral hydration group (OHG) administered 600 ml of water before ESWL, while the control group (CG) did not. The urine was held during ESWL to create a full bladder induced hydronephrosis. Both groups received the same ESWL protocol at four-week intervals and a maximum of three sessions. The primary outcome was stone-free rate (SFR) at 12 weeks and the secondary outcomes were the total number of shockwaves and the number of ESWL sessions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 154 patients completed the study, 77 patients in each group; both groups were comparable in demographic data and stone characteristics. The SFR was 84.4% in the OHG and 68.8% in the CG group (p=0.036). Stone fragmentation in OHG was significantly higher than CG, 75.3% vs. 58.4% (p=0.040). OHG had more cases of artificial hydronephrosis (55.8% vs. 27.3%, p=0.001) and higher urine volume (375 [148] ml vs. 230 [110] ml, p<0.001). There were no statistically significant differences in the total number of shockwaves and the number of ESWL sessions. The auxiliary procedures in OHG were less than CG (15.6% vs. 31.2%, p=0.049).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Pretreatment oral hydration, together with holding urine during ESWL, has increased stone disintegration and SFR. This simple and safe technique improves the ESWL outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":50613,"journal":{"name":"Cuaj-Canadian Urological Association Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cuaj-Canadian Urological Association Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5489/cuaj.8877","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: We sought to investigate the effects of pretreatment oral hydration on the outcomes of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL).

Methods: Patients who undergoing ESWL for a single radio-opaque renal or proximal ureteric calculus ≤2 cm in size were randomized into two groups. The oral hydration group (OHG) administered 600 ml of water before ESWL, while the control group (CG) did not. The urine was held during ESWL to create a full bladder induced hydronephrosis. Both groups received the same ESWL protocol at four-week intervals and a maximum of three sessions. The primary outcome was stone-free rate (SFR) at 12 weeks and the secondary outcomes were the total number of shockwaves and the number of ESWL sessions.

Results: A total of 154 patients completed the study, 77 patients in each group; both groups were comparable in demographic data and stone characteristics. The SFR was 84.4% in the OHG and 68.8% in the CG group (p=0.036). Stone fragmentation in OHG was significantly higher than CG, 75.3% vs. 58.4% (p=0.040). OHG had more cases of artificial hydronephrosis (55.8% vs. 27.3%, p=0.001) and higher urine volume (375 [148] ml vs. 230 [110] ml, p<0.001). There were no statistically significant differences in the total number of shockwaves and the number of ESWL sessions. The auxiliary procedures in OHG were less than CG (15.6% vs. 31.2%, p=0.049).

Conclusions: Pretreatment oral hydration, together with holding urine during ESWL, has increased stone disintegration and SFR. This simple and safe technique improves the ESWL outcomes.

治疗前口服水合对体外冲击波碎石效果的影响:随机对照试验。
简介:我们试图研究治疗前口服水合对体外冲击波碎石术(ESWL)效果的影响:方法:将接受体外冲击波碎石术治疗单个放射性肾结石或输尿管近端结石(大小不超过 2 厘米)的患者随机分为两组。口服水合组(OHG)在 ESWL 前服用 600 毫升水,而对照组(CG)不服用。在 ESWL 过程中憋尿,以造成膀胱充盈诱发肾积水。两组均接受相同的 ESWL 方案,间隔四周,最多三次。主要结果是 12 周时的无结石率(SFR),次要结果是冲击波总数和 ESWL 治疗次数:共有 154 名患者完成了研究,每组 77 人;两组在人口统计学数据和结石特征方面具有可比性。OHG组的SFR为84.4%,CG组为68.8%(P=0.036)。OHG组结石碎裂率明显高于CG组,分别为75.3%和58.4%(P=0.040)。OHG 有更多的人工肾积水病例(55.8% 对 27.3%,P=0.001)和更高的尿量(375 [148] ml 对 230 [110] ml,P结论:治疗前口服水合剂,同时在 ESWL 期间憋尿,可增加结石崩解和 SFR。这种简单而安全的技术可提高 ESWL 的效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cuaj-Canadian Urological Association Journal
Cuaj-Canadian Urological Association Journal 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
10.50%
发文量
167
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: CUAJ is a a peer-reviewed, open-access journal devoted to promoting the highest standard of urological patient care through the publication of timely, relevant, evidence-based research and advocacy information.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信