Predicting cancer detection rates from multiparametric prostate MRI: Beyond the PI-RADS classification system.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Agustin Perez-Londono, Francisco Ramos, Aaron Fleishman, Sumedh Kaul, Ruslan Korets, Michael Johnson, Aria F Olumi, Leo Tsai, Boris Gershman
{"title":"Predicting cancer detection rates from multiparametric prostate MRI: Beyond the PI-RADS classification system.","authors":"Agustin Perez-Londono, Francisco Ramos, Aaron Fleishman, Sumedh Kaul, Ruslan Korets, Michael Johnson, Aria F Olumi, Leo Tsai, Boris Gershman","doi":"10.5489/cuaj.8902","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Although the Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI RADS) categorization represents the standard method for assessing the risk of prostate cancer using prostate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), there exists wide variation in cancer detection rates (CDRs) in real-world practice. We therefore evaluated the association of clinical and radiographic features with CDRs and developed a predictive model to improve clinical management.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We identified men aged 18-89 years with elevated prostate-specfic antigen (PSA) or on active surveillance for prostate cancer who underwent MRI-ultrasound (US) fusion biopsy or in-bore MRI-targeted biopsy. The associations of features with the per-lesion CDR (Gleason 6- 10) and clinically significant (cs) CDR (Gleason 7-10) were examined using logistic regression, and results were operationalized into a predictive model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Targeted biopsy was performed for 347 lesions in 281 patients. Overall, the CDR was 49.0% and the csCDR was 28.0%. On multivariable analysis, increasing PI-RADS category, no prior prostate biopsies, smaller prostate size, and increasing PSA density were independently associated with higher CDR, while 0-1 prior prostate biopsies, and a solitary PI-RADS 3-5 lesion were associated with higher csCDR. A predictive model provided a greater net benefit than a strategy of performing biopsy in all PI-RADS 3-5 lesions across a wide range of threshold probabilities.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Several clinical and radiographic features are independently associated with the risk of prostate cancer in men undergoing MRI-targeted biopsy. A predictive model based on these features can improve clinical decisions regarding biopsy compared to the conventional strategy of performing biopsy for all PI-RADS 3-5 lesions.</p>","PeriodicalId":50613,"journal":{"name":"Cuaj-Canadian Urological Association Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cuaj-Canadian Urological Association Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5489/cuaj.8902","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Although the Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI RADS) categorization represents the standard method for assessing the risk of prostate cancer using prostate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), there exists wide variation in cancer detection rates (CDRs) in real-world practice. We therefore evaluated the association of clinical and radiographic features with CDRs and developed a predictive model to improve clinical management.

Methods: We identified men aged 18-89 years with elevated prostate-specfic antigen (PSA) or on active surveillance for prostate cancer who underwent MRI-ultrasound (US) fusion biopsy or in-bore MRI-targeted biopsy. The associations of features with the per-lesion CDR (Gleason 6- 10) and clinically significant (cs) CDR (Gleason 7-10) were examined using logistic regression, and results were operationalized into a predictive model.

Results: Targeted biopsy was performed for 347 lesions in 281 patients. Overall, the CDR was 49.0% and the csCDR was 28.0%. On multivariable analysis, increasing PI-RADS category, no prior prostate biopsies, smaller prostate size, and increasing PSA density were independently associated with higher CDR, while 0-1 prior prostate biopsies, and a solitary PI-RADS 3-5 lesion were associated with higher csCDR. A predictive model provided a greater net benefit than a strategy of performing biopsy in all PI-RADS 3-5 lesions across a wide range of threshold probabilities.

Conclusions: Several clinical and radiographic features are independently associated with the risk of prostate cancer in men undergoing MRI-targeted biopsy. A predictive model based on these features can improve clinical decisions regarding biopsy compared to the conventional strategy of performing biopsy for all PI-RADS 3-5 lesions.

从多参数前列腺磁共振成像预测癌症检出率:超越 PI-RADS 分类系统。
前言:尽管前列腺成像报告和数据系统(PI RADS)分类是使用前列腺磁共振成像(MRI)评估前列腺癌风险的标准方法,但在实际应用中,癌症检出率(CDR)存在很大差异。因此,我们评估了临床和放射学特征与 CDR 的关联,并开发了一个预测模型来改善临床管理:我们对年龄在 18-89 岁之间、前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)升高或正处于前列腺癌主动监测期、接受核磁共振成像(MRI)-超声波(US)融合活检或腔内核磁共振成像靶向活检的男性进行了鉴定。采用逻辑回归法研究了特征与每个病灶CDR(Gleason 6-10)和有临床意义(cs)CDR(Gleason 7-10)之间的关系,并将结果转化为一个预测模型:结果:对281名患者的347个病灶进行了靶向活检。总体而言,CDR 为 49.0%,csCDR 为 28.0%。在多变量分析中,PI-RADS类别增加、既往未进行过前列腺活检、前列腺体积较小和PSA密度增加与较高的CDR独立相关,而既往进行过0-1次前列腺活检和单独的PI-RADS 3-5病变与较高的csCDR相关。与在广泛的阈值概率范围内对所有PI-RADS 3-5病变进行活检的策略相比,预测模型提供的净收益更大:结论:在接受磁共振成像靶向活检的男性中,有几个临床和放射学特征与前列腺癌风险独立相关。与对所有 PI-RADS 3-5 病变进行活检的传统策略相比,基于这些特征的预测模型可以改善活检的临床决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cuaj-Canadian Urological Association Journal
Cuaj-Canadian Urological Association Journal 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
10.50%
发文量
167
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: CUAJ is a a peer-reviewed, open-access journal devoted to promoting the highest standard of urological patient care through the publication of timely, relevant, evidence-based research and advocacy information.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信