Predicting cancer detection rates from multiparametric prostate MRI Beyond the PI-RADS classification system.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Agustin Perez-Londono, Francisco Ramos, Aaron Fleishman, Sumedh Kaul, Ruslan Korets, Michael Johnson, Aria F Olumi, Leo Tsai, Boris Gershman
{"title":"Predicting cancer detection rates from multiparametric prostate MRI Beyond the PI-RADS classification system.","authors":"Agustin Perez-Londono, Francisco Ramos, Aaron Fleishman, Sumedh Kaul, Ruslan Korets, Michael Johnson, Aria F Olumi, Leo Tsai, Boris Gershman","doi":"10.5489/cuaj.8902","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Although the Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) categorization represents the standard method for assessing the risk of prostate cancer using prostate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), there exists wide variation in cancer detection rates (CDRs) in real-world practice. We therefore evaluated the association of clinical and radiographic features with CDRs and developed a predictive model to improve clinical management.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We identified men aged 18-89 years with elevated prostate-specfic antigen (PSA) or on active surveillance for prostate cancer who underwent MRI-ultrasound (US) fusion biopsy or in-bore MRI-targeted biopsy. The associations of features with the per-lesion CDR (Gleason 6-10) and clinically significant (cs) CDR (Gleason 7-10) were examined using logistic regression, and results were operationalized into a predictive model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Targeted biopsy was performed for 347 lesions in 281 patients. Overall, the CDR was 49.0% and the csCDR was 28.0%. On multivariable analysis, increasing PI-RADS category, smaller prostate size, and increasing PSA density were independently associated with higher CDR, while prior prostate biopsy was associated with lower CDR. A solitary PI-RADS 3-5 lesion was independently associated with higher csCDR, while 2+ prior prostate biopsies was associated with a lower csCDR. A predictive model provided a greater net benefit than a strategy of performing biopsy in all PI-RADS 3-5 lesions across a wide range of threshold probabilities.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Several clinical and radiographic features are independently associated with the risk of prostate cancer in men undergoing MRI-targeted biopsy. A predictive model based on these features can improve clinical decisions regarding biopsy compared to the conventional strategy of performing biopsy for all PI-RADS 3-5 lesions.</p>","PeriodicalId":50613,"journal":{"name":"Cuaj-Canadian Urological Association Journal","volume":" ","pages":"E85-E91"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11879260/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cuaj-Canadian Urological Association Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5489/cuaj.8902","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Although the Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) categorization represents the standard method for assessing the risk of prostate cancer using prostate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), there exists wide variation in cancer detection rates (CDRs) in real-world practice. We therefore evaluated the association of clinical and radiographic features with CDRs and developed a predictive model to improve clinical management.

Methods: We identified men aged 18-89 years with elevated prostate-specfic antigen (PSA) or on active surveillance for prostate cancer who underwent MRI-ultrasound (US) fusion biopsy or in-bore MRI-targeted biopsy. The associations of features with the per-lesion CDR (Gleason 6-10) and clinically significant (cs) CDR (Gleason 7-10) were examined using logistic regression, and results were operationalized into a predictive model.

Results: Targeted biopsy was performed for 347 lesions in 281 patients. Overall, the CDR was 49.0% and the csCDR was 28.0%. On multivariable analysis, increasing PI-RADS category, smaller prostate size, and increasing PSA density were independently associated with higher CDR, while prior prostate biopsy was associated with lower CDR. A solitary PI-RADS 3-5 lesion was independently associated with higher csCDR, while 2+ prior prostate biopsies was associated with a lower csCDR. A predictive model provided a greater net benefit than a strategy of performing biopsy in all PI-RADS 3-5 lesions across a wide range of threshold probabilities.

Conclusions: Several clinical and radiographic features are independently associated with the risk of prostate cancer in men undergoing MRI-targeted biopsy. A predictive model based on these features can improve clinical decisions regarding biopsy compared to the conventional strategy of performing biopsy for all PI-RADS 3-5 lesions.

从多参数前列腺磁共振成像预测癌症检出率:超越 PI-RADS 分类系统。
前言:尽管前列腺成像报告和数据系统(PI RADS)分类是使用前列腺磁共振成像(MRI)评估前列腺癌风险的标准方法,但在实际应用中,癌症检出率(CDR)存在很大差异。因此,我们评估了临床和放射学特征与 CDR 的关联,并开发了一个预测模型来改善临床管理:我们对年龄在 18-89 岁之间、前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)升高或正处于前列腺癌主动监测期、接受核磁共振成像(MRI)-超声波(US)融合活检或腔内核磁共振成像靶向活检的男性进行了鉴定。采用逻辑回归法研究了特征与每个病灶CDR(Gleason 6-10)和有临床意义(cs)CDR(Gleason 7-10)之间的关系,并将结果转化为一个预测模型:结果:对281名患者的347个病灶进行了靶向活检。总体而言,CDR 为 49.0%,csCDR 为 28.0%。在多变量分析中,PI-RADS类别增加、既往未进行过前列腺活检、前列腺体积较小和PSA密度增加与较高的CDR独立相关,而既往进行过0-1次前列腺活检和单独的PI-RADS 3-5病变与较高的csCDR相关。与在广泛的阈值概率范围内对所有PI-RADS 3-5病变进行活检的策略相比,预测模型提供的净收益更大:结论:在接受磁共振成像靶向活检的男性中,有几个临床和放射学特征与前列腺癌风险独立相关。与对所有 PI-RADS 3-5 病变进行活检的传统策略相比,基于这些特征的预测模型可以改善活检的临床决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cuaj-Canadian Urological Association Journal
Cuaj-Canadian Urological Association Journal 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
10.50%
发文量
167
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: CUAJ is a a peer-reviewed, open-access journal devoted to promoting the highest standard of urological patient care through the publication of timely, relevant, evidence-based research and advocacy information.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信