Facilitators and Barriers to Integrating Patient-Generated Blood Pressure Data into Primary Care EHR Workflows.

IF 2.1 2区 医学 Q4 MEDICAL INFORMATICS
Applied Clinical Informatics Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-13 DOI:10.1055/s-0044-1790554
Shannon M Canfield, Richelle J Koopman
{"title":"Facilitators and Barriers to Integrating Patient-Generated Blood Pressure Data into Primary Care EHR Workflows.","authors":"Shannon M Canfield, Richelle J Koopman","doi":"10.1055/s-0044-1790554","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong> Evidence supports using patient-generated blood pressure data for better outcomes in hypertension management. However, obstacles like dealing with home-generated paper data sets and questions of validity slowed the meaningful incorporation of home blood pressure into clinical care. As clinicians value patient data more, reliance on digital health solutions for data collection and shared decision-making grows.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong> The purpose of this study is to evaluate the design and early implementation of an electronic health record (EHR)-based data visualization tool and explore the barriers or facilitators to integrating) patients' home blood pressure data into the electronic workflow in the clinical setting. Findings can inform potential next steps for implementation and provide recommendations for leveraging patient-generated health data (PGHD) in hypertension management.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong> We qualitatively explored pre- and early-implementation factors for integrating PGHD into clinicians' EHR interfaces intended to support shared decision-making using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). We collected data in the form of notes and transcripts from clinician focus groups, administrative leadership feedback sessions, research team observations, and recurring team meetings. This study took place at a midwestern academic health center.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> We identify implementation facilitating factors, adoption considerations, and next steps across CFIR domains focusing on large-scale implementation. Key recommendations include aligning internal and external priorities, empowering champions to facilitate uptake, using intuitive design, and anticipating and planning for unintended consequences.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> These findings can guide future efforts to include PGHD in workflows, thus enhancing shared decision-making and laying the groundwork for larger implementations. Understanding the implementation barriers and facilitators to connect PGHD to clinician apps in the EHR workspace can promote their adoption and maintenance.</p>","PeriodicalId":48956,"journal":{"name":"Applied Clinical Informatics","volume":"15 5","pages":"942-951"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11560398/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Clinical Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0044-1790554","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICAL INFORMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background:  Evidence supports using patient-generated blood pressure data for better outcomes in hypertension management. However, obstacles like dealing with home-generated paper data sets and questions of validity slowed the meaningful incorporation of home blood pressure into clinical care. As clinicians value patient data more, reliance on digital health solutions for data collection and shared decision-making grows.

Objectives:  The purpose of this study is to evaluate the design and early implementation of an electronic health record (EHR)-based data visualization tool and explore the barriers or facilitators to integrating) patients' home blood pressure data into the electronic workflow in the clinical setting. Findings can inform potential next steps for implementation and provide recommendations for leveraging patient-generated health data (PGHD) in hypertension management.

Methods:  We qualitatively explored pre- and early-implementation factors for integrating PGHD into clinicians' EHR interfaces intended to support shared decision-making using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). We collected data in the form of notes and transcripts from clinician focus groups, administrative leadership feedback sessions, research team observations, and recurring team meetings. This study took place at a midwestern academic health center.

Results:  We identify implementation facilitating factors, adoption considerations, and next steps across CFIR domains focusing on large-scale implementation. Key recommendations include aligning internal and external priorities, empowering champions to facilitate uptake, using intuitive design, and anticipating and planning for unintended consequences.

Conclusion:  These findings can guide future efforts to include PGHD in workflows, thus enhancing shared decision-making and laying the groundwork for larger implementations. Understanding the implementation barriers and facilitators to connect PGHD to clinician apps in the EHR workspace can promote their adoption and maintenance.

将患者生成的血压数据纳入初级保健电子病历工作流程的促进因素和障碍。
背景:有证据表明,使用患者生成的血压数据可提高高血压管理的效果。然而,处理家庭生成的纸质数据集和有效性问题等障碍减缓了将家庭血压纳入临床护理的步伐。随着临床医生对患者数据的重视,越来越多的人开始依赖数字健康解决方案来收集数据和共享决策:本研究的目的是评估基于电子健康记录(EHR)的数据可视化工具的设计和早期实施情况,并探讨将患者家庭血压数据整合到临床电子工作流程中的障碍或促进因素。研究结果可为下一步可能的实施提供信息,并为在高血压管理中利用患者生成的健康数据(PGHD)提供建议:我们采用实施研究综合框架(CFIR)对将患者生成的健康数据整合到临床医生电子病历界面以支持共同决策的前期和早期实施因素进行了定性研究。我们从临床医生焦点小组、行政领导反馈会议、研究团队观察和反复召开的团队会议中以笔记和记录誊本的形式收集数据。本研究在中西部的一家学术医疗中心进行:结果:我们确定了实施的促进因素、采用的注意事项以及在 CFIR 各领域的下一步措施,重点是大规模实施。主要建议包括调整内部和外部优先事项、授权倡导者以促进吸收、使用直观设计以及预测和计划意外后果:这些研究结果可以指导今后的工作,将性别平等与发展纳入工作流程,从而加强共同决策,为更大规模的实施奠定基础。了解将 PGHD 与电子病历工作区中的临床医生应用程序连接起来的实施障碍和促进因素,可以促进其采用和维护。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Applied Clinical Informatics
Applied Clinical Informatics MEDICAL INFORMATICS-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
24.10%
发文量
132
期刊介绍: ACI is the third Schattauer journal dealing with biomedical and health informatics. It perfectly complements our other journals Öffnet internen Link im aktuellen FensterMethods of Information in Medicine and the Öffnet internen Link im aktuellen FensterYearbook of Medical Informatics. The Yearbook of Medical Informatics being the “Milestone” or state-of-the-art journal and Methods of Information in Medicine being the “Science and Research” journal of IMIA, ACI intends to be the “Practical” journal of IMIA.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信