Exploring Public Perceptions of Telenursing: A Q Methodology Study.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING
Nursing Open Pub Date : 2024-11-01 DOI:10.1002/nop2.70087
Ick-Jee Kim
{"title":"Exploring Public Perceptions of Telenursing: A Q Methodology Study.","authors":"Ick-Jee Kim","doi":"10.1002/nop2.70087","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To investigate public perceptions of telenursing in South Korea, an Asian country that is transitioning to the introduction of telenursing and possesses a high level of information and communication technology. This study sought to uncover strategies for the successful introduction and extension of telenursing by identifying the characteristics of existing perceptions.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Q methodology was applied.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 188 Q populations were selected from the literature, Internet sources, newspaper articles and in-depth interviews about telenursing, from which the final 37 Q statements were derived. Forty-nine people who were expected to have diverse perspectives about telenursing were selected purposively and participated in Q-sorting. The data were obtained from November 2022 to December 2022 and analysed with principal component analysis and varimax rotations using PQMethod version 2.11.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five types of perceptions regarding telenursing in South Korea were identified: 'Factor I: Preference for convenience and efficiency of telenursing, Active acceptance', 'Factor II: Complete support for telenursing, Total acceptance', 'Factor III: Complete skepticism for telenursing, Total nonacceptance', 'Factor IV: Expectance of the supplementary roles of telenursing, Immediate acceptance' and 'Factor V: Expectance of the supplementary roles of telenursing, Prolonged acceptance'.</p><p><strong>Patient or public contribution: </strong>Patients and the public were not involved in this study's design, recruitment and implementation.</p>","PeriodicalId":48570,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Open","volume":"11 11","pages":"e70087"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11555485/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.70087","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: To investigate public perceptions of telenursing in South Korea, an Asian country that is transitioning to the introduction of telenursing and possesses a high level of information and communication technology. This study sought to uncover strategies for the successful introduction and extension of telenursing by identifying the characteristics of existing perceptions.

Design: Q methodology was applied.

Methods: A total of 188 Q populations were selected from the literature, Internet sources, newspaper articles and in-depth interviews about telenursing, from which the final 37 Q statements were derived. Forty-nine people who were expected to have diverse perspectives about telenursing were selected purposively and participated in Q-sorting. The data were obtained from November 2022 to December 2022 and analysed with principal component analysis and varimax rotations using PQMethod version 2.11.

Results: Five types of perceptions regarding telenursing in South Korea were identified: 'Factor I: Preference for convenience and efficiency of telenursing, Active acceptance', 'Factor II: Complete support for telenursing, Total acceptance', 'Factor III: Complete skepticism for telenursing, Total nonacceptance', 'Factor IV: Expectance of the supplementary roles of telenursing, Immediate acceptance' and 'Factor V: Expectance of the supplementary roles of telenursing, Prolonged acceptance'.

Patient or public contribution: Patients and the public were not involved in this study's design, recruitment and implementation.

探索公众对远程护理的看法:Q 方法研究。
目的:调查韩国公众对远程护理的看法。韩国是一个正在向引入远程护理过渡的亚洲国家,拥有高水平的信息和通信技术。本研究试图通过确定现有认知的特点来揭示成功引入和推广远程护理的策略:设计:采用 Q 方法:方法:从有关远程护理的文献、互联网资料、报刊文章和深入访谈中选取了共计188个Q人群,并从中得出了最终的37个Q陈述。我们有目的性地选择了49位预计对远程护理有不同看法的人参与Q分类。数据收集于 2022 年 11 月至 2022 年 12 月,并使用 PQMethod 2.11 版进行主成分分析和方差旋转分析:结果:韩国人对远程护理的认知分为五种类型:因子 I:因素一:对远程护理的便利性和效率的偏好,主动接受","因素二:对远程护理的完全支持,主动接受":完全支持远程护理,完全接受"、"因素三:完全怀疑远程护理,完全不接受"、"因素四:期待远程护理的辅助作用,立即接受 "和 "因素五:期待远程护理的辅助作用,立即接受":患者或公众的贡献:患者和公众未参与本研究的设计、招募和实施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nursing Open
Nursing Open Nursing-General Nursing
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
4.30%
发文量
298
审稿时长
17 weeks
期刊介绍: Nursing Open is a peer reviewed open access journal that welcomes articles on all aspects of nursing and midwifery practice, research, education and policy. We aim to publish articles that contribute to the art and science of nursing and which have a positive impact on health either locally, nationally, regionally or globally
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信