Microvascular Reconstructions in Elderly Patients With Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma - Too Old for Surgical Treatment?

IF 0.8 Q4 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Anne Radermacher, Dominik Horn, Michael Fehrenz, Karl Semmelmayer, Oliver Ristow, Michael Engel, Jürgen Hoffmann, Kolja Freier, Julius Moratin
{"title":"Microvascular Reconstructions in Elderly Patients With Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma - Too Old for Surgical Treatment?","authors":"Anne Radermacher, Dominik Horn, Michael Fehrenz, Karl Semmelmayer, Oliver Ristow, Michael Engel, Jürgen Hoffmann, Kolja Freier, Julius Moratin","doi":"10.1177/19433875241272437","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>A major risk factor for oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) is advanced age. Ablative surgery combined with microvascular reconstruction has become routine for OSCC. Nevertheless, there is an interdisciplinary debate about the appropriateness of surgery combined with prolonged general anesthesia in the elderly. In the present study, the ablative and microvascular strategies in OSCC were evaluated in terms of oncologic safety and surgical morbidity in relation to age.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 345 patients with primary OSCC who underwent ablative tumor surgery and neck dissection according to the German national guideline for OSCC together with microvascular reconstruction from September 2010 to October 2017 were examined. General clinical data was analyzed descriptively with a special focus on perioperative morbidity of an elderly (≥70y) subgroup of 56 patients. Oncological outcome was estimated using Log Rank testing and Kaplan Meier plotting.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Estimated 5 year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) was 69.6% (≥70y) vs. 76.7% (<70y) and 62.9% (≥70y) vs. 78.2% (<70y) respectively with no significant difference between the 2 age groups. In multivariate cox regression, only initial stage of disease revealed significant impact on OS. Analysis of perioperative death/complications, flap loss, operation time, dependence on tracheostomy and hospitalization revealed no significant differences between the 2 groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Tumor surgery including neck dissection in combination with primary microvascular reconstruction is a safe therapy in patients of advanced age. This results in excellent oncological outcome with no significant disadvantages in terms of perioperative morbidity, hospitalization or flap failure.</p>","PeriodicalId":46447,"journal":{"name":"Craniomaxillofacial Trauma & Reconstruction","volume":" ","pages":"19433875241272437"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11559590/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Craniomaxillofacial Trauma & Reconstruction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19433875241272437","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study design: Retrospective cohort study.

Objective: A major risk factor for oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) is advanced age. Ablative surgery combined with microvascular reconstruction has become routine for OSCC. Nevertheless, there is an interdisciplinary debate about the appropriateness of surgery combined with prolonged general anesthesia in the elderly. In the present study, the ablative and microvascular strategies in OSCC were evaluated in terms of oncologic safety and surgical morbidity in relation to age.

Methods: A total of 345 patients with primary OSCC who underwent ablative tumor surgery and neck dissection according to the German national guideline for OSCC together with microvascular reconstruction from September 2010 to October 2017 were examined. General clinical data was analyzed descriptively with a special focus on perioperative morbidity of an elderly (≥70y) subgroup of 56 patients. Oncological outcome was estimated using Log Rank testing and Kaplan Meier plotting.

Results: Estimated 5 year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) was 69.6% (≥70y) vs. 76.7% (<70y) and 62.9% (≥70y) vs. 78.2% (<70y) respectively with no significant difference between the 2 age groups. In multivariate cox regression, only initial stage of disease revealed significant impact on OS. Analysis of perioperative death/complications, flap loss, operation time, dependence on tracheostomy and hospitalization revealed no significant differences between the 2 groups.

Conclusions: Tumor surgery including neck dissection in combination with primary microvascular reconstruction is a safe therapy in patients of advanced age. This results in excellent oncological outcome with no significant disadvantages in terms of perioperative morbidity, hospitalization or flap failure.

口腔鳞状细胞癌老年患者的微血管重建--年龄太大,不适合手术治疗?
研究设计回顾性队列研究:口腔鳞状细胞癌(OSCC)的一个主要风险因素是高龄。烧蚀手术结合微血管重建已成为治疗口腔鳞状细胞癌的常规方法。然而,对于老年人是否适合在长时间全身麻醉的情况下进行手术还存在跨学科的争论。本研究从肿瘤学安全性和与年龄相关的手术发病率的角度,对OSCC的消融和微血管策略进行了评估:2010年9月至2017年10月期间,共有345名原发性OSCC患者根据德国OSCC国家指南接受了肿瘤消融手术和颈部切除术,同时进行了微血管重建。对一般临床数据进行了描述性分析,特别关注了56名老年(≥70岁)亚组患者的围手术期发病率。采用对数秩检验和卡普兰-梅耶尔绘图法估算肿瘤结果:结果:估计的5年总生存率(OS)和无病生存率(DFS)分别为69.6%(≥70岁)和76.7%(结论:对于高龄患者来说,包括颈部切除术在内的肿瘤手术联合原发性微血管重建术是一种安全的治疗方法。在围手术期的发病率、住院时间或皮瓣失败率方面没有明显的劣势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Craniomaxillofacial Trauma & Reconstruction
Craniomaxillofacial Trauma & Reconstruction DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
39
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信