Nils-Claudius Gellrich, Michael Grant, Damir Matic, Philippe Korn
{"title":"Guidelines for Orbital Defect Assessment and Patient-Specific Implant Design: Introducing OA<sup>2</sup> (Orbital Assessment Algorithm).","authors":"Nils-Claudius Gellrich, Michael Grant, Damir Matic, Philippe Korn","doi":"10.1177/19433875241272436","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>This study presents a review of the evolutionary development in reconstructive orbital surgery over the past 3 decades. Additionally, it proposes the Orbital Assessment Algorithm (OA<sup>2</sup>) to enhance decision-making for intraorbital reconstruction of post-traumatic orbital deformities.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this paper is to provide insights into modern post-traumatic orbital reconstruction from a surgeon's perspective, with a specific focus on adult patients. It aims to highlight the advancements in computer-aided design and manufacturing techniques, particularly in the field of reconstructive orbital surgery, and to introduce the OA<sup>2</sup> as a tool for improved decision-making in this context.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study conducts a comprehensive review of the evolution of reconstructive orbital surgery, focusing on the integration of 3D technology into surgical practices. It also outlines the development and rationale behind the proposed OA2, emphasizing its potential to enhance the accuracy and efficacy of intraorbital reconstruction procedures for post-traumatic deformities.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The review demonstrates the significant progress made in reconstructive orbital surgery, particularly in leveraging 3D technology for virtual modeling, navigation, and the design and manufacturing of patient-specific implants. The introduction of the OA<sup>2</sup> provides a structured approach to assessing and addressing post-traumatic orbital deformities, offering potential benefits in decision-making and surgical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In conclusion, this paper underscores the pivotal role of computer-aided design and manufacturing in advancing reconstructive orbital surgery. It highlights the importance of integrating innovative design concepts into implant manufacturing processes and emphasizes the potential of the OA<sup>2</sup> to guide surgeons in the management of post-traumatic orbital deformities, ultimately contributing to improved patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":46447,"journal":{"name":"Craniomaxillofacial Trauma & Reconstruction","volume":" ","pages":"19433875241272436"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11559584/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Craniomaxillofacial Trauma & Reconstruction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19433875241272436","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Study design: This study presents a review of the evolutionary development in reconstructive orbital surgery over the past 3 decades. Additionally, it proposes the Orbital Assessment Algorithm (OA2) to enhance decision-making for intraorbital reconstruction of post-traumatic orbital deformities.
Objective: The objective of this paper is to provide insights into modern post-traumatic orbital reconstruction from a surgeon's perspective, with a specific focus on adult patients. It aims to highlight the advancements in computer-aided design and manufacturing techniques, particularly in the field of reconstructive orbital surgery, and to introduce the OA2 as a tool for improved decision-making in this context.
Methods: The study conducts a comprehensive review of the evolution of reconstructive orbital surgery, focusing on the integration of 3D technology into surgical practices. It also outlines the development and rationale behind the proposed OA2, emphasizing its potential to enhance the accuracy and efficacy of intraorbital reconstruction procedures for post-traumatic deformities.
Results: The review demonstrates the significant progress made in reconstructive orbital surgery, particularly in leveraging 3D technology for virtual modeling, navigation, and the design and manufacturing of patient-specific implants. The introduction of the OA2 provides a structured approach to assessing and addressing post-traumatic orbital deformities, offering potential benefits in decision-making and surgical outcomes.
Conclusions: In conclusion, this paper underscores the pivotal role of computer-aided design and manufacturing in advancing reconstructive orbital surgery. It highlights the importance of integrating innovative design concepts into implant manufacturing processes and emphasizes the potential of the OA2 to guide surgeons in the management of post-traumatic orbital deformities, ultimately contributing to improved patient outcomes.